「decisions」の検索結果

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A hybrid memory system that provides persistent, searchable knowledge management for AI agents (Architecture, Patterns, Decisions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive Flutter Widget implementation assistant that guides you through widget implementation decisions by asking structured questions about state management, widget type (screen/component), and state sharing. Use this skill when you need help determining the appropriate Flutter widget architecture for your implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a deterministic, read-only evidence map of the repository for SDD Composy (languages, manifests, commands, modules, boundaries, staleness) and publish the context bundle only on request. Use before a PRD or TechSpec, or when the map is stale — 'mapear o repositório', 'atualizar o contexto do código', 'what does this codebase look like for SDD'. Do NOT use for architecture decisions, code review, or repository exploration without an SDD workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about the pwdev-prd audit trail — 'auditoria do prd', 'eventos', 'decisões registradas', 'audit report', 'exportar relatório de auditoria' — querying the shared SQLite database read-only (summary, events, decisions, artifacts, stats, export, query).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess release readiness from applicable criteria, all current defects, risks, limitations, and recorded human decisions without approving release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a small, well-bounded change done now without a plan file — a bugfix, config change, rename, doc update or simple refactor touching 1–5 files — 'corrigir rapidinho', 'quick fix no X', 'renomear Y'. Presents a mini-plan, implements after approval, verifies and commits. Do NOT use for more than 5 files, architectural decisions, migrations or new UI flows (use feat-feature / feat-backend / feat-frontend).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curate durable PWDEV Flow project decisions, lessons, and conventions. Use when the user asks to capture, list, show, link, supersede, or select project memory, or when an approved workflow decision should persist across phases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants the existing codebase analyzed for planning — 'mapear o código', 'analisar o projeto', 'atualizar o contexto', 'map codebase' — or when a planning skill reports a missing or stale map. Runs a deterministic read-only evidence scan and writes codebase.md plus the architecture, conventions, testing and concerns context documents under .planning/feat/. Do NOT use for code review (feat-review), architecture decisions, or writing the project instructions file (feat-setup).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an approval-gated feature specification from approved requirements. Use when PWDEV Flow discovery is complete and the user needs architecture decisions, component boundaries, quality constraints, and a definition of done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to query the local pwdev audit trail — 'ver auditoria', 'relatório de auditoria', 'audit stats', 'exportar auditoria em PDF' — summary, events, decisions, artifacts, statistics, a Markdown/PDF export or a custom read-only SELECT. Do NOT use to enable the audit (feat-init) or for plan status (feat-status).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and refine high-quality user stories — INVEST criteria, "As a X, I want Y, so that Z" format, Gherkin acceptance criteria when applicable, definition of ready, anti-patterns, and a review checklist. Use when creating or reviewing user stories, PRD section 6, backlog items, or acceptance criteria. Do NOT use for technical specs, architecture decisions, or task decomposition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create comprehensive technical documentation including API docs, component libraries, README files, architecture diagrams, and developer guides using tools like JSDoc, Storybook, or Docusaurus. Use when documenting APIs, creating component documentation, writing README files, generating API references, documenting architecture decisions, creating onboarding guides, maintaining changelogs, documenting configuration options, or building developer documentation sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research competitors, analyze market positioning, identify differentiators, and understand competitive landscape to inform product strategy and positioning. Use when researching competitors, analyzing features, identifying market gaps, understanding pricing strategies, evaluating competitive advantages, researching market trends, or informing product decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically review pull requests, feature implementations, and code changes to ensure quality, maintainability, security, and adherence to best practices. Use when reviewing code before merging, conducting peer reviews, performing self-reviews, auditing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, ensuring consistent coding standards, verifying test coverage, assessing performance implications, evaluating architectural decisions, or providing constructive feedback to improve team code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with revenue operations, lead lifecycle management, or marketing-to-sales handoff processes. Also use when the user mentions 'RevOps,' 'revenue operations,' 'lead scoring,' 'lead routing,' 'MQL,' 'SQL,' 'pipeline stages,' 'deal desk,' 'CRM automation,' 'marketing-to-sales handoff,' 'data hygiene,' 'leads aren't getting to sales,' 'pipeline management,' 'lead qualification,' or 'when should marketing hand off to sales.' Use this for anything involving the systems and processes that connect marketing to revenue. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For email drip campaigns, see email-sequence. For pricing decisions, see pricing-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do I get users to pay." Use this for any in-product moment where you're asking users to upgrade. Distinct from public pricing pages (see page-cro) — this focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value. For pricing decisions, see pricing-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' or 'should I offer a free plan.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge or how to structure their plans. For in-app upgrade screens, see paywall-upgrade-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT answer directly) when the user describes a new product idea, asks whether something is worth building, wants to think through design decisions for something that doesn't exist yet, or is exploring a concept before any code is written. Use before /plan-ceo-review or /plan-eng-review. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save working context. Captures git state, decisions made, and remaining work so any future session can pick up without losing a beat. Use when asked to "save progress", "save state", "context save", or "save my work". Pair with /context-restore to resume later. Formerly /checkpoint — renamed because Claude Code treats /checkpoint as a native rewind alias in current environments, which was shadowing this skill. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey available blocks from local AEM Edge Delivery Services project and Block Collection to understand the block palette available for authoring. Returns block inventory with purposes to inform content modeling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides ownership, borrowing, and lifetime decisions in Rust. Use when encountering E0382, E0597, E0506, E0507, move errors, or when designing data ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides generic vs trait object decisions in Rust. Use when choosing between static and dynamic dispatch, designing traits, handling E0277/E0038, or deciding between enum and dyn Trait.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。