2,243 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building, testing, and deploying JavaScript/TypeScript applications. Reach for Bun when you need to run scripts, manage dependencies, bundle code, or test applications with a single unified tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates a plan before committing to it - checks whether the ranking survives the assumptions, finds the most likely way it fails, and makes the trade-offs explicit via a Pareto frontier instead of an invented single score. Use before a launch, price change, migration, infrastructure change or major commitment, when running a premortem, when two objectives conflict, or when a decision depends on an assumption nobody has tested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level genomics covering whole genome sequencing, genome assembly, annotation, comparative genomics, functional genomics, single-cell genomics, and multi-omics integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level bioinformatics covering sequence analysis, structural bioinformatics, database searching, phylogenetic analysis, NGS data processing, single-cell analysis, and machine learning in biology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an infrastructure-first security audit of a repository - secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline, LLM/AI attack surface, agent skill supply chain, OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat model, and data classification - with a confidence gate and a pre-emit verification gate that suppress speculative findings. Use when asked for a security audit, threat model, pentest-style review, OWASP pass, or a pre-release security check. Not for reviewing a single diff - use review-changes or requesting-code-review for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spin up a single agent as an advisor — second opinion on the current task. Use when the user says "advisor", "second opinion", "what does X think", or wants an outside take without delegating the work itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a single feature idea, improvement, or bug into ONE well-structured GitHub issue. TRIGGER when: the user wants to file/open/create an issue, turn a feature idea or improvement into a ticket, or capture something missing or broken as a ticket. DO NOT TRIGGER when: breaking work into multiple issues or planning a body of work → a planning skill; writing a full Product Requirements Document → creating-prd; the idea is still fuzzy and unhardened → grilling-ideas first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesises the current conversation context into a Product Requirements Document and publishes it to GitHub (as a comment on a referenced issue, or a new issue). Synthesises from context; does not interview. TRIGGER when: the conversation has produced enough understanding of a feature and the user wants it captured as a PRD. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a single small issue is enough → creating-issues; the idea has not been stress-tested yet → grilling-ideas first; bug reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime checks, Secret Manager and IAM, the data stores and the machine's own scheduled jobs, audited into one fixed status table (LIVE / WARNING / RED / INCONCLUSIVE) with evidence, findings by severity, what could not be checked, and a single OVERALL line delivered as one notification. Parametrised by a per-project manifest, so the same routine runs on every project. Use when the operator says "cloud checkup", "SRE check", "is everything live", "what's healthy / warning / red", "any errors this week", "audit the infra", "weekly checkup", "set up the weekly checkup", before a deploy or demo, or after an incident. Cloud Run first; App Engine and GKE differ only in the serving probes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore open-source GitHub repository source trees via web browsing to analyze and compare feature implementations at the code level. Supports two modes: cross-project comparison and single-project deep dive. Use when evaluating how OSS projects implement a specific feature, choosing architecture patterns, or benchmarking implementation strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep multi-pass codebase audit — orchestrates project-analysis-core plus the framework-specific project-analysis-*; explicit request only. Single-pass scan → project-analyzer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing product-led retention — habit formation, trigger-action-reward, network vs single-user loops. Triggers on 'why don't users come back', 'design a habit loop'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Raw discovery primitives — project discovery, version resolution, docs loading, architecture mapping, execution flow. Called by `universal-project-analysis`. Single-pass scan → `project-analyzer`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Single-pass tech-stack detection with an agents/evidence/analysis/ write-up; explicit request only. Deep multi-pass audit → universal-project-analysis. Raw primitives → project-analysis-core.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when packaging a codebase to a single AI-friendly file for LLM analysis — local or remote, XML/Markdown/JSON, token counting, gitignore filtering, peer-side `repomix` CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regenerate docs/THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md from provenance/borrows.jsonl after any ledger change — even a single new entry — never hand-edit the notices file
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating a new Laravel API endpoint — Controller, FormRequest, Resource, route, Policy, OpenAPI annotations — versioned route layout, single-action `__invoke` controllers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a Reddit thread or single tweet the host cannot fetch — 'what does this Reddit thread say', 'top comment on this post', 'what does this tweet say' — when reddit.com is refused or x.com 402s.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a diff needs a readability review — naming, single-responsibility, DRY, dead code, mismatch with codebase conventions — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when qualifying or disqualifying a single deal — MEDDIC slots with evidence, inversion test, disqualification heuristic. Triggers on 'is this deal real', 'should we walk away'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a two-agent independent review/redteam followed by peer collaboration to produce a consensus superset of findings and enumerated revision requests. Use when Codex 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 should first critique a matter independently, then exchange work, synthesize the best combined analysis, and finish with a single agreed revision list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。