4,876 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
System diagnostics and health checks for Diverga plugin. OpenClaw-style Check-Report-Fix pattern with 5-layer diagnostics. Triggers: /diverga:doctor, diverga doctor, system check, diagnose, 진단
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
APSA style checker for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks numbers, capitalization, abbreviations, italics, in-text citations, titles of works, neutral and unbiased language, and APSA-specific terminology against the APSA Style Manual for Political Science (2018, updated 2023). Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to check APSA style, fix citations, review capitalization, check number formatting, or flag biased language in a .qmd document. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, use the proofread skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unwraps hard-wrapped markdown files so that each sentence ends with a newline instead of mid-sentence line breaks. Joins continuation lines within a paragraph into single lines, then re-breaks at sentence boundaries (period, question mark, exclamation point). Preserves blank lines, headings, fenced code blocks, block quotes, and list items. Use when asked to unwrap text, fix line breaks, reflow sentences, or clean up hard-wrapped markdown or .qmd files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill covers structural econometric models. Use when the user is building, estimating, or debugging structural models — including BLP demand estimation, dynamic discrete choice, auction models, or any workflow involving moment conditions, nested fixed-point algorithms, or MPEC formulations. Triggers on "structural model", "moment conditions", "NFXP", "MPEC", "BLP", "random coefficients", "dynamic discrete choice", "CCP", "Rust model", "auction estimation", "GMM objective", "inner loop", "contraction mapping", or convergence/starting value problems in optimization-based estimation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep consistency audit of the entire repository — launches 4 parallel specialist agents to find factual errors, code bugs, broken references, count mismatches, and cross-document inconsistencies, then fixes all issues and loops until clean. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants a comprehensive repository-wide check — not a targeted review of a single file. Triggers include: "audit", "deep audit", "find inconsistencies", "check everything", "run a full audit", "are there any broken references", "check the whole repo", "something feels off", "run the audit loop", or after making broad changes across multiple files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the complete post-first-draft polishing pipeline for an academic LaTeX paper by invoking five existing skills in fixed order: (1) paper-polish, (2) paper-self-revise, (3) paper-style, (4) paper-polish again, (5) reference-verify. Trigger when user says "paper pipeline" / "paper-pipeline" / "论文流水线" / "全流程打磨" / "一条龙打磨" / "初稿打磨" / "full polish pipeline" / "run the whole pipeline", or wants the entire post-draft polishing sequence run on a paper folder. Use this skill whenever the user asks for several paper-finishing steps (polish + revise + style + reference check) on one manuscript in one go, even if they don't name every individual skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Econometrics skill for Difference-in-Differences (DID) analysis. Activates when the user asks about: "difference in differences", "DID", "DiD", "diff-in-diff", "parallel trends", "treatment group", "control group", "pre-treatment", "post-treatment", "policy evaluation", "natural experiment", "staggered DID", "event study regression", "two-way fixed effects DID", "callaway santanna", "sun and abraham", "双重差分", "倍差法", "平行趋势", "处理组", "对照组", "政策评估", "事件研究", "交错DID", "渐进处理"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upgrade of chinese-ppt for Chinese Beamer decks (xelatex + ctex + fandol, CUFE template). Same 7-section outline and X→M→Y framework, but adds (a) mandatory 1.3 line-spacing + 3pt paragraph spacing, (b) overflow-prevention line budget + balanced split-frame rules, (c) prose rewrites that strip AI-ish "关键比较/理论映射" labels and redundant 章节括号注释, (d) stricter CJK-space + middle-dot rules, (e) retrofit workflow for existing chinese-ppt decks, (f) mandatory local linespread reset inside TikZ / table / fixed-geometry frames. Use for "做中文学术PPT 2 版"、"中文 Beamer 改进版"、"答辩 PPT chinese-ppt2"、"防越界 PPT"等请求。用户在 Overleaf 编译，只产出 .tex + figures/，不要附加 compile 脚本。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step pipeline an applied economist or quantitative social scientist runs on every paper — (1) data cleaning, (2) variable construction & transformation, (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1, (4) statistical diagnostic tests, (5) baseline empirical modeling, (6) robustness battery, (7) further analysis (mechanism, heterogeneity, mediation, moderation), (8) publication-ready tables & figures. **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation via `zepid` / hand-rolled `pandas`, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `zepid` / `econml` / `lifelines`, Mendelian randomization via `pymr` / `mrtool` (or `rpy2` → `MendelianRandomization`/`TwoSampleMR`), KM / AFT / Cox survival via `lifelines`, E-value sensitivity, principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `econml.dml` / `doubleml`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `econml.metalearners` / `causalml`, causal forest via `econml.grf` / `causalml`, Dragonnet / TARNet / CEVAE neural causal via `causalml`, BCF via `pymc-bart` / `bcf-py`, matrix completion, CATE distribution + policy tree via `econml.policy` / `policytree-py`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal via `mapie`, fairness audit via `fairlearn`, DAG learning via `causal-learn` / `cdt` / LLM-assisted). Prescribes which library to reach for at each step, shows the canonical code, and links to deeper `references/` files for variant-specific patterns. Use when the user asks for a **complete empirical analysis** in Python, wants to replicate an applied-economics paper from scratch, needs a reproducible workflow that is NOT opinionated on any single vertical package (contrast with StatsPAI), wants explicit control over every estimator and diagnostic, or asks "how do I write a full empirical pipeline in Python?". Also triggers when the user names a specific classical step in isolation — "winsorize at 1/99%", "run Breusch-Pagan", "build a Table 1 balance table", "do a placebo test", "event study plot", "mediation analysis" — and wants it wired into the broader pipeline. Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation", "IPTW", "TMLE", "Mendelian randomization", "STROBE", "公共健康", "流行病学". Mode B triggers on "DML", "double machine learning", "causal forest", "meta-learner", "Dragonnet", "BCF", "policy tree", "conformal causal", "fairness audit", "因果机器学习".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use this skill when writing, drafting, editing, reviewing, or revising any text to eliminate predictable AI tells, slop, and formulaic patterns. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to "deslop", "de-AI", "make it sound human," "remove AI patterns," "remove AI tropes," "clean up AI writing," fix "slop," "deslop" text, or review prose for authenticity. Also use when the user asks you to write or draft anything and wants it to sound natural rather than AI-generated. Common use cases include scientific writing (manuscripts, abstracts, cover letters, grant narratives, discussion sections, peer review responses), blog posts, newsletters, memos, reports, and any other substantial prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental workflow for babysitting one explicitly authorized pull or merge request. Use to monitor its live review state and checks, fix actionable in-scope findings, and apply separate reply, approval, merge, and soak gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental workflow for auditing recurring feedback, telemetry, errors, and brittle delivery paths to find systemic fixes. Use for periodic or requested cross-source lookbacks, not routine single-item intake.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental workflow for collecting and triaging product feedback, product telemetry, runtime errors, and issue reports. Use when scanning configured signal sources and applying separate fix, reply, or close rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn one approved master still into a character's whole animated sprite set - one image-to-video clip per action (idle, walk, run, attack, jump, hurt, cast and so on), all from that still, generated through generate2dmedia route_media.py (the xAI API when a key is configured, else the local Grok CLI) - then gate each take, key it with a soft matte, register it to the master, pick loops or retime actions, finish (HD by default, pixel on request) and package fixed-canvas frames, alpha WebM, packed MP4 for iPhone and a PNG fallback with engine metadata and a JS runtime. Also processes a supplied clip. Use for character and creature animation, fluid motion and any video-to-sprite work. Not for FX, icon or prop sheets (generate2dsprite), maps or plate loops (generate2dmap), code-drawn animation (codeart2d, only on request) or calling a video API by itself (generate2dmedia).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update Plugin Guide cards, fixtures, and annotations when public SDK contracts or Guide presentation change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to declare work complete, fixed, passing, or done
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process screenshot-based UI/UX feedback to fix visual issues — use when users share screenshots of bugs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prototype one risky assumption within a fixed budget, then keep or discard the result
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decompose and execute large changes, migrations, or multi-issue fixes in parallel with quality gates
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrite the last response simpler and shorter in plain English, prefixed with a 3-5 sentence TLDR of the conversation so far. Manual-only, invoked as /remind.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run five independent max-effort reviews (Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Muse Wonder), merge their findings, and fix only what the user approves. Manual only: run when a human types /total-review; agents must never invoke it on their own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a prompt teammates can give their AI agents to apply a fix, upgrade, or setup change. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /prompt-for-others.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。