「fundamental」の検索結果

Use when a report or dashboard is slow, timing out, hitting row limits, or consuming excessive system resources on large-volume objects — covers selective filter strategy, custom report type optimization, async report execution via Analytics API, dashboard refresh scheduling, and grouping/aggregation tuning. Triggers: 'report times out', 'report is slow', 'dashboard not refreshing', 'report row limit hit', 'too many report results'. NOT for CRM Analytics / Tableau CRM performance (separate skill). NOT for sharing-model or visibility issues causing missing rows (use admin/sharing-and-visibility). NOT for building or designing reports from scratch (use admin/reports-and-dashboards-fundamentals).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Custom Report Type design — when to create a CRT vs use the standard, A-with-B-without and A-without-B joins, primary/secondary/related-via-lookup objects, the 60-field display limit, and field-set vs cross-join layouts. NOT for building the report or dashboard itself once the report type exists — use admin/reports-and-dashboards-fundamentals. Keywords: reportType metadata, baseObject, outerJoin, ObjectRelationship, ReportLayoutSection, checkedByDefault, displayNameOverride, deployed false, custom report type sprawl, report type inventory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when learning, designing, or explaining Salesforce Reports and Dashboards from first principles — report types, custom report types, groupings, bucket fields, summary formulas, charts, dashboard components, dynamic dashboards, report subscriptions, and folder permissions. Triggers: 'how do I build a report', 'what report type should I use', 'set up a dashboard', 'joined report limits', 'bucket field vs formula', 'dynamic dashboard running user'. NOT for CRM Analytics (use crm-analytics-* skills). NOT for Einstein Discovery predictive analytics. NOT for troubleshooting missing report data caused by sharing model issues (use admin/reports-and-dashboards for that).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or troubleshooting CRM Analytics dashboards — chart types, bindings, faceting, dashboard interactions, mobile layout, and filters. NOT for standard Salesforce reports and dashboards — use admin/reports-and-dashboards-fundamentals. NOT for hand-editing dashboard JSON or a SAQL step — use admin/analytics-dashboard-json.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous analysis expert covering limits, continuity, sequences, series, and measure theory foundations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Neuroscience expert covering brain structure, neural signaling, cognition, and neurological disorders

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classical and modern physics expert covering mechanics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and relativity

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Graphic design expert covering typography, color theory, layout, and visual communication

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generative Engine Optimization for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Context is the complete state available to a language model at inference time. It includes everything the model can attend to when generating responses: system instructions, tool definitions, retrieved documents, message history, and tool outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research historical news events that moved (or are moving) an asset's price and plot them as data points directly on the chart. Click a marker in the Historic News tab to zoom the chart to that event and read the article. Useful for identifying the fundamental drivers behind price action — earnings, regulation, product launches, macro shocks, geopolitical events.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

欧盟 AI 法案知识引擎——以 70 份官方欧盟来源文件为基础的权威监管问答（包括 2026 年委员会关于 Art. 6 高风险分类的指南草稿——一般原则、附件 I、附件 III）。基于完整条例文本、委员会指南、EDPB/EDPS 意见、《实践守则》、协调标准、FRIA 指南、事件模板和行业特定指引，以条款级引用回答关于 AI 法案的任何问题。当用户询问"EU AI Act"、"AI Act regulation"、"Regulation 2024/1689"、"KI-Verordnung"、要求"explain an AI Act article"、"what does Article X say"、"AI Act requirements"、"AI Act penalties"、"AI Act timeline"、"GPAI obligations"、"high-risk AI"、"prohibited AI practices"、"AI Act and GDPR"、"fundamental rights impact assessment"、"AI Act standards"、"AI Act national implementation"、"AI literacy"、"serious incident reporting"、"Digital Omnibus"、"AI regulatory sandbox"，或任何关于欧盟人工智能监管的问题时，应使用本技能。德语术语同样触发："KI-Gesetz"、"KI-Verordnung"、"Hochrisiko-KI"、"KI-Kompetenz"、"Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung"、"GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"。对于产出分类决定而非知识答案的评估工作流，提议在会话内运行结构化风险等级分类。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build publication-quality figures with matplotlib using the object-oriented Figure/Axes API, constrained_layout, rcParams customization, TrueType (Type-42) font embedding for journal submission, and CVD-safe palettes. Covers seaborn integration, common chart types, axis formatting, and the small gotchas that distinguish reproducible matplotlib from notebook scratch. Use when producing publication figures in Python — RNA-seq scatter, single-cell embeddings, generic biological plotting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build publication-quality figures in R with ggplot2 using the grammar of graphics (data + aesthetics + geometries + scales + facets + themes) with CVD-safe palettes, cairo_pdf TrueType embedding, programmatic aes via tidy evaluation, and the theme_classic publication baseline. Use when producing static figures in R for papers, presentations, or reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and algorithms for AI agent episodic memory. Covers vector stores (HNSW, IVF, PQ), temporal indexing, knowledge graphs with triple stores, hierarchical summarization, forgetting curves, working/long-term/ procedural memory, and memory consolidation. Deep analysis of MemGPT/Letta, Zep/Graphiti, Mem0, and the Stanford generative agents memory architecture. Teaches the CS fundamentals behind how agents remember, retrieve, and forget. Activate on: "agent memory", "episodic memory", "vector search algorithm", "HNSW", "memory retrieval", "forgetting curve", "knowledge graph memory", "MemGPT", "Letta", "Zep", "Mem0", "memory consolidation", "temporal retrieval", "agent long-term memory", "memory layer". NOT for: conversation protocol design (use agent-conversation-protocols), agent infrastructure selection (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), building RAG pipelines (use ai-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for first principles thinking, or when the user questions an inherited default: "why do we do it this way?", "is this cost really necessary?", "should we copy what competitors do?". Strips analogies and rebuilds from fundamentals. Skip for convention-following checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze NFT projects for investment decisions — evaluate fundamentals, identify red flags, assess risk, and provide buy/hold/avoid recommendations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level fusion energy covering plasma physics fundamentals, confinement methods, tokamak design, ITER, private fusion ventures, and the path to commercial fusion power.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level semiconductor materials covering band theory, silicon processing, compound semiconductors, wide bandgap materials, and semiconductor device fundamentals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level particle physics knowledge. Use when working with the Standard Model, quarks, leptons, bosons, fundamental forces, Feynman diagrams, quantum field theory, particle accelerators, or particle detectors. Also use when the user mentions 'Standard Model', 'quark', 'lepton', 'boson', 'Higgs', 'gluon', 'neutrino', 'antimatter', 'Feynman diagram', 'QCD', 'QED', 'electroweak', 'LHC', or 'particle accelerator'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fundamentos de SEO, E-E-A-T, Core Web Vitals e princípios do algoritmo do Google.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct" often has no single answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base synthesized from the Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) v2.14 by the BKCASE Project. Use for the established systems-engineering canon: SE fundamentals and foundations (systems science, systems thinking, the systems approach, modelling/MBSE), the life cycle (ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288/24748/24774 process, development & agile approaches, model selection/tailoring), technical management, concept definition, architecture/realization (the Vee), V&V, maintenance/sustainment, SE standards, and the application contexts (product, service, enterprise, systems-of-systems, healthcare), plus enabling SE (business/team/individual), related disciplines, quality attributes/specialty engineering, implementation examples, and emerging knowledge. Good for grounding background, vocabulary, and prior-art positions across all eight SEBoK Parts. SCOPE LIMITS: this pack is SEBoK v2.14 only (released 2026-05-18); it synthesizes and signposts rather than reproducing the source — it does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE standard text, is a curated guide (not a complete textbook), and is thin on AI-integration depth (Part 8 is a staging area, not settled practice). LICENCE: content is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 — non-commercial use only, attribution to the BKCASE Project required, share-alike obligations carry forward.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD M&S VV&A Recommended Practices Guide (RPG web edition). Use for verification, validation, and accreditation of models and simulations — role responsibilities (user, developer, M&S PM, V&V agent, accreditation agent), fidelity, validation fundamentals, data V&V, risk-informed accreditation, T&E/V&V integration, referent development, and conceptual-model validation. Complements nasa-ms-7009 and T&E packs; does not replace DoDI 5000.61 or Service VV&A policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。