「validation」の検索結果

Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs complete research plans that integrate clinical variables with multi-omics data from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a study that combines clinical variables with transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, or related omics layers for mechanism interpretation, biomarker development, risk stratification, treatment-response analysis, or translational use. It should define the clinical use case, alignment across data layers, feature-reduction and fusion logic, modeling route, mechanism-interpretation layer, validation ladder, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, platform coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a realistic, execution-aware biomedical study version under explicit constraints of samples, time, budget, data access, lab capacity, team skill, and validation resources. Always use this skill when the user has a real study idea, a candidate route, or a partially framed project but cannot assume ideal conditions. If critical feasibility inputs are missing, first clarify what resources are currently available, what resources may be obtainable, and what resources are realistically unavailable. Do not invent access, capabilities, collaborations, or validation resources. Focus first on feasibility-constrained study framing, route narrowing, dependency control, and minimum viable study design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs complete integrated research plans for bulk transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and related omics from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a bulk multi-omics or single-omics-plus-clinical study — including disease-focused, mechanism-focused, biomarker-focused, stratification-oriented, or translational projects. It should define the research question, choose the best-fit study pattern, recommend example datasets as reference candidates only, specify the core analysis modules and method choices, propose a validation ladder, and output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, cohort availability, assay coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies translationally meaningful paths for bioinformatics findings by mapping omics or computational discoveries to diagnosis, stratification, prognosis, treatment-response, monitoring, or target-nomination use cases, while auditing bridge evidence, assayability, and validation burden. Use this skill when a user wants to know whether a bioinformatics finding can be framed as a stronger translational topic without overclaiming clinical relevance. Always separate statistical signal from translational value, and never imply clinical utility, targetability, or validation depth without explicit evidence support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects methodological gaps across study design, analysis, validation, bias control, reproducibility, and implementation readiness within a biomedical research area. Use this skill when a user wants to identify what current studies are still methodologically missing, which weaknesses are most consequential, and what upgrade path would produce a stronger next-step study. Always separate design gaps, analysis gaps, validation gaps, and reproducibility gaps. Never treat technical complexity as methodological rigor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineers the methods section of a biomedical paper into a structured, reproducible workflow. Use this skill when a user wants to understand how a study was actually executed, extract data sources, inclusion/exclusion logic, preprocessing, analytical sequence, software/tools, validation path, and critical parameters, or build a replication checklist from a paper, abstract, DOI, PMID, title, screenshot, or partial methods text. Do not treat this as generic summarization. Focus on reconstructing the operational method pipeline, surfacing missing reproducibility details, and distinguishing explicitly reported steps from inferred or unresolved ones. Never fabricate references, methods details, identifiers, software versions, parameters, datasets, or validation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether study results are trustworthy by auditing design integrity, sample structure, statistical handling, bias control, validation chain, and claim discipline. It identifies where results are robust, fragile, overfit, under-validated, or overclaimed. Always separate reported findings from reliability judgment. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, study features, or validation claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guardrails AI validation framework setup for LLM applications. Implement input/output validation, safety checks, and structured output enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous visual validation expert specializing in UI testing, design system compliance, and accessibility verification. Masters screenshot analysis, visual regression testing, and component validation. Use PROACTIVELY to verify UI modifications have achieved their intended goals through comprehensive visual analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a configuration management expert specializing in validating, testing, and ensuring the correctness of application configurations. Create comprehensive validation schemas, implement configurat

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specify plant models for closed-loop simulation: system specs, architecture, build plans, validation plans. Use when creating, updating, or reviewing plant model specifications, planning plant model architecture, or planning plant model validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add, configure, and manage faults on Simulink, Simscape, and System Composer model signals for robustness analysis and safety validation. Use when injecting faults (stuck, noise, gain, offset) onto block inports/outports, enabling fault simulation, or analyzing fault effects. Covers sensor failures, signal corruptions, actuator faults, FMEA validation, and robustness testing. Requires Simulink Fault Analyzer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that a form actually rejects bad input: the error message renders, the submit button stays disabled, and no request goes out. Use when validation logic was written but never driven, when a "required" or pattern check looks right on screen but was never proven, or when a bug report says the form submitted invalid data anyway.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing MATLAB functions with arguments blocks — repeating arguments (arguments (Repeating)), .?ClassName property import in constructors, name-value forwarding with namedargs2cell, or migrating from inputParser or validateattributes. Also when reviewing signatures for implicit-conversion pitfalls (size reshaping, class coercion, computed defaults), or when restricting, constraining, or validating function inputs — scalar vs vector enforcement, type rejection, size checking. Also when asked to harden inputs, make a function more robust, tighten input checking, or rewrite for safer input acceptance — even without "validation" or "arguments block" wording. Triggers on: arguments block, mustBe validators, name-value arguments, varargin, inputParser, nargin/narginchk, restrict input, type checking, scalar constraint, harden inputs, defensive programming. Not for: App Designer callbacks, Simulink mask parameters, class inheritance, or runtime validation outside function or property declarations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to classify tabular data end-to-end in MATLAB — load a dataset, prepare and clean it, select promising classifiers, train them, and compare accuracies with cross-validation, holdout, or hyperparameter optimization plus statistical tests. TRIGGER when: user asks to classify tabular data, pick classifiers for a dataset, compare classifier accuracy, run cross-validation or a holdout evaluation, or find the best model with statistical uncertainty. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user has non-tabular inputs (images, sequences, time series), wants a regression model, is training a specific neural network architecture (use matlab-train-network), or wants cost-sensitive learning or an arbitrary class-prior vector (this skill only supports the built-in uniform-prior toggle for imbalanced data).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose App Store submission blockers and operate review health with asc, including readiness validation, repair routing, status monitoring, cancellation, and retry decisions. Use when validation fails, a version is not in a valid state, review status is unclear or stuck, or a failed submission must be repaired and retried. For staging, upload, publication, and submission execution, use asc-release-flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to validate product-market fit, measure PMF, or plan before scaling. Also use when the user mentions "PMF," "product-market fit," "product market fit," "Sean Ellis test," "very disappointed," "vitamin vs painkiller," "PMF validation," "premature scaling," or "validate before scale." For GTM after validation, use gtm-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design forms that convert, validate well, resist spam, and integrate cleanly with downstream systems. Use this skill when designing or auditing any form (contact, signup, checkout, multi-step, embedded), planning validation logic, fighting spam, choosing form tooling, or improving form conversion. Triggers on form design, form validation, form conversion, multi-step form, form spam, captcha, honeypot, form abandonment, signup form, contact form. Also triggers when form completion rates are low or spam is overwhelming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the Part 5 client validation document: evidence-cited findings for client decisions. "prepare v1 findings for client review"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviewer critique dimensions for peer review - implementation bias detection, test quality validation, completeness checks, and priority validation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test design mandate enforcement, test budget validation, TDD phase validation (3-phase canon per ADR-025), and external validity checks for the software crafter reviewer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。