3,481 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes and improves prompts using 31 frameworks across 7 intent categories. Use when a user wants to improve, rewrite, structure, or engineer a prompt — including requests like "help me write a better prompt", "improve this prompt", "what framework should I use", "make this prompt more effective", or any prompt engineering task. Recommends the right framework based on intent (create, transform, reason, critique, recover, clarify, agentic), asks targeted questions, and delivers a structured, high-quality result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating, writing, reviewing, annotating, repairing, refactoring, or validating readable Verilog RTL, including synthesizable Verilog-2001 .v files, existing-RTL analysis, semantic comment annotation, testbench scaffold planning, ASIC-quality review, local or remote Vivado/xsim validation, evidence-backed repair, and workflow trace diagnosis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate Agent Skill design quality with an opinionated, practice-derived rubric informed by public specifications and examples. Use when reviewing, auditing, comparing, or improving SKILL.md files and skill packages. Produces evidence-backed findings, optional multi-dimensional scoring, and prioritized changes; treat the result as diagnostic guidance, not official certification or a universal standard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coach leaders and managers to prepare, run, and review high-bandwidth meetings that advance real work and decisions. Use for meeting retrospectives, employee work reviews, decision meetings, agenda and question design, direct feedback, meeting-quality diagnosis, or repeated low-value discussions. Preserve direct standards without taking over the worker's work or degrading the truth signal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deeply research technical architecture, source code, mechanisms, SDKs, frameworks, project comparisons, and system-design options across repositories, history, official docs, issues, discussions, and high-quality community signals. Use when the user asks for deep research, source-level understanding, architecture comparison, mechanism satisfaction, or evidence for designing a system. Always map the question and obtain confirmation before beginning substantive research; skip for simple factual lookups or straightforward implementation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "line edit", "edit my prose", "polish this chapter", "tighten the prose", "improve the sentences", "copyedit", "proofread", "proof pass", "check grammar and punctuation", "dialogue punctuation", "make the voices distinct", "everyone sounds the same", "read it aloud", "read-aloud pass", "text to speech", or wants a sentence-level quality pass on drafted chapters that preserves the author's voice. NOT for creating the style sheet, recording character voices, or checking voice consistency (use voice-style).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate high-quality academic Beamer slides from a thesis/paper (PDF, Word, or LaTeX source). Compatible with Claude Code and Codex. Supports thesis defense, proposal presentations, and conference talks. Built-in layout library with 13 professional page types, 5 color schemes, and interactive editing loop. Use when: (1) User asks to create thesis defense slides/PPT, (2) User wants to generate academic presentation from a paper, (3) User mentions beamer, 答辩PPT, 学术报告, 开题PPT, 论文幻灯片, or academic slides, (4) User has a PDF/docx/tex thesis and wants presentation output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand audience demographics, preferences, behavior patterns, and engagement quality across Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous Principal Design Technologist. Cures vibe-coded software from AI frontend slop using curated token archetypes and 7-axis quality gating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI-focused SRE incident response practices for LLM outages, degraded quality, runaway cost events, and safety regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous AI code generation safety guardrail register: static AST analysis, forbidden import filters, and zero-day vulnerability checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board (Asana, GitHub Projects, Linear). Manages multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves the quality of images, especially screenshots, by enhancing resolution, sharpness, and clarity. Perfect for preparing images for presentations, documentation, or social media posts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies high-quality leads for your product or service by analyzing your business, searching for target companies, and providing actionable contact strategies. Perfect for sales, business development, and marketing professionals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides SOC 2 Type II Privacy Trust Services Criteria preparation and audit execution. Covers AICPA TSP Section 100 Privacy criteria P1-P8 including notice, choice/consent, collection, use/retention/disposal, access, disclosure, security, and quality. Includes evidence collection, control testing, and report review. Keywords: SOC 2, privacy criteria, TSP, AICPA, Type II, trust services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Processes GDPR Article 16 right to rectification requests, covering verification of corrected data accuracy, notification to recipients under Article 19, timeline management, and completion of incomplete data. Activate for rectification, correction request, inaccurate data, Art. 16, data correction queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
把已经完成并通过质检的 Markdown 内容转换成可粘贴到微信公众号后台的 HTML，并支持选择样式、生成预览和检查粘贴兼容性。用户要制作公众号排版稿或微信发布版本时使用。 English: Convert a finished, quality-checked Markdown draft into HTML that can be pasted into the WeChat Official Accounts editor, with style selection, preview generation, and paste-compatibility checks. Use when the user needs a formatted WeChat publishing version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。