「risk」の検索結果

Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test a marketing decision using multiple expert lenses and synthesize disagreements into a clear decision with evidence and risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to design, construct, or improve an offer — the thing they actually sell — including value framing, bonus stacking, guarantee design, scarcity/urgency, naming, and payment structure. Also use when the user mentions 'offer,' 'offer design,' 'build an offer,' 'grand slam offer,' 'irresistible offer,' 'value stack,' 'bonus stack,' 'guarantee,' 'risk reversal,' 'money-back guarantee,' 'scarcity,' 'urgency,' 'high-ticket offer,' 'productize a service,' 'naming an offer,' 'payment plan,' 'down-sell,' 'upsell offer,' or 'why isn't my offer converting.' Best for services, agencies, courses, coaching, info products, high-ticket B2B, and direct-response. If you run pure self-serve SaaS, read pricing first — tiers and packaging do more work there. For price level itself (tiers, freemium, value metric), see pricing. For the page that presents the offer, see copywriting. For the launch moment, see launch. For sales collateral, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "pick a launch date", "plan the launch window", or "set the embargo and lift time"; produces a candidate-window comparison table (conflict / tailwind / risk per window) built from industry-event cycles and the competitor launch calendar, a launch-week vs rolling-release format call, store-review buffer padding (labeled Estimated), and an embargo window definition (lift moment + timezone) submitted to the launch registry as a candidate. Not for judging the cultural moment itself — use trend-spotter; not for launch-day execution — use launch-day-conductor. 发布择时/发布窗口/竞品日历/禁运期窗口/审核缓冲

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design an employee advocacy program", "set up founder-led sharing", or "build a share kit for the team"; produces an advocacy program blueprint in two modes — participation-driven opt-in (default) or top-down assigned with its coercion and authenticity risks flagged — with a voluntary opt-in roster spec submitted as channel-registry proposal events, share kits with mandatory per-person variation, staggered human posting windows plus anti-pod guardrails (no coordinated identical reshares, no engagement rings), per-person material-connection disclosure lines per FTC and 《互联网广告管理办法》, and a Slack/Teams distribution spec. Not for paid creator campaigns — use campaign-planner. 员工倡导/创始人IP分享/内部分享计划/披露合规

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a source-grounded paid-advertising audit for one or more of Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, and X. Use for full ad checks, account health reviews, paid-media diagnostics, partial audits after authentication or worker failure, missing-platform weighting, beta-feature eligibility and scoring, spend audits, tracking audits, or prioritized opportunities and risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks common code quality and maintainability risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

変更が将来インシデントや技術的負債を引き起こすと仮定し、その原因と経路を逆算して設計の盲点を可視化する

Ensure architecture/design docs state traffic assumptions, performance budgets, resource limits, and cost risks for critical paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check common security risks in application code (SQLi, XSS, secrets, open redirect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects patterns that make tests flaky and proposes stabilization steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Control risky structural change by proving a refactor is necessary and that behaviour, contracts, data, security boundaries, and operational properties can be preserved through a staged migration. Use whenever the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, modernise, extract, migrate, rewrite, or re-architect existing code, or asks whether they should. Prefer this over starting the refactor. DO NOT REFACTOR is a first-class outcome. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving necessity and behavioural preservation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks to inspect, audit, review, assess, or evaluate a codebase/project for maintainability, extensibility, architecture, reliability, security, testing, engineering quality, or AI-agent/prompt/tooling risks. Also use this when invoked by `/inspect`. It performs a read-only, evidence-backed, multi-agent project inspection with complete file coverage, per-dimension scoring, blunt technical findings, and explicit degraded-mode disclosure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review, harden, and test the safety policy for AI-Controlled Party mixer/Soundcraft Ui24R scene arming. Use for approval gates, blocked mixer operations, hazardous request handling, venue validation, bypass attempts, QA, risk review, or follow-up safety changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Govern FriendlyBet agent values, professional standards, anti-hallucination behavior, truthfulness, risk reporting, AI resource discipline, feedback loops, skill improvement, performance reviews, decision-rights hygiene, and team quality. Use when creating, reviewing, promoting, correcting, or retiring agents; reducing hallucinations or mistakes; reviewing AI/tool usage; handling agent incidents; or aligning work with Eyal's philanthropic user-first approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as FriendlyBet's CEO and primary front door for every FriendlyBet request through automatic company preflight. Own end-to-end routing, planning, execution coordination, department orchestration, decision-rights enforcement, quality gates, board-style reporting, and escalation only for strategic, legal, brand, cost, risk, or taste decisions. Use by default in FriendlyBet threads, with full department planning for broad, ambiguous, strategic, cross-functional, or outcome-driven requests such as SEO, new features, multi-sport expansion, product direction, release execution, company operations, or agent coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic ambiguity resolution through tiered information gathering. Use when facing unclear requirements, unknown context, uncertain implementation choices, or any situation where guessing would be risky.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end Android indie idea workflow — feature-build phase only (no monetization). Phased — discover (if no idea) → generate 2 candidates → refine scope (offline/online, sharing, MVP vs full, core-value features) → risk/reward/tradeoff analysis when scoping down → emit idea brief. Use for greenfield app concepts, new feature ideation, idea discovery, or pre-design discovery before writing a design document. Triggers — new app idea, feature concept, indie dev brainstorm, validate idea, refine idea, what should I build, find an app idea, idea pipeline, I have no idea, help me find an app idea, scope down, MVP scoping, core value features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a 5-part mini spec (goal, constraints, acceptance criteria, verification, done gate) before starting any multi-step, externally-delivered, or risky task. Triggers when: a request has 3+ steps, touches external delivery, or is easy to declare done too early. NOT for: single lookups, one-line edits, routine acks, or simple factual answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Adyen — adyen payment platform management including merchant accounts, payment methods, terminal configuration, risk management, settlement reports, and webhook notifications. Covers authorization rates, payment method performance, fraud scoring, and payout reconciliation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Snyk — snyk security scanning and vulnerability analysis. Covers dependency vulnerability scanning, container image scanning, IaC security scanning, code analysis, license compliance, and fix recommendations. Use when scanning for vulnerabilities, analyzing dependency risks, reviewing container security, or auditing IaC configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。