「decide」の検索結果

Designs automated email and SMS programs — welcome and onboarding sequences, nurture, re-engagement, transactional messaging, and the timing and segmentation behind them. Use this to build or fix an email sequence, plan lifecycle automation, improve open or click performance, set up SMS flows, or decide what messages a customer should receive and when.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds the help center, in-product guidance, and knowledge base that let customers resolve problems without contacting anyone — content, findability, maintenance, and deflection measurement. Use this to build or fix a help center, reduce support volume, write documentation for customers, improve findability, or decide what deserves a help article versus a product fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs the warehouse and semantic layer — source-to-mart structure, dimensional modeling, grain, slowly changing dimensions, and the metric layer analytics reads through. Use this to design or restructure a warehouse, model a new source, decide on grain or table structure, build a semantic or metric layer, or diagnose why queries are slow, wrong, or impossible to write.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the ongoing relationship with accounts after the sale — segmenting coverage against account value, building a health score that predicts rather than describes, running reviews customers find worth attending, forecasting renewals honestly, and finding expansion that follows usage instead of quota. Use this to design a customer success motion, decide who gets a named contact, work out why renewals surprise you, or fix a health score everyone ignores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establishes what something actually costs — fixed, variable and mixed cost behavior, absorption versus variable costing, job-order, process and activity-based methods, breakeven and operating leverage, and price/volume/mix decomposition. Use this to set a price floor, explain why revenue or margin moved, decide make versus buy, judge whether a product line earns its place, or work out how an allocation basis is distorting a reported margin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds reporting and self-serve analytics that people actually use — metric trees, dashboard design, distribution, and the discipline that stops dashboards proliferating. Use this to build a dashboard or report, design a metrics framework, set up self-serve analytics, decide what to measure, or diagnose why reporting exists but nobody uses it or trusts it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs, runs, and reads A/B tests and growth experiments — hypothesis, sample size, duration, and honest interpretation. Use this to plan a test, judge whether a result is real, build an experimentation program, decide what to test next, or diagnose why tests keep producing inconclusive or non-replicating results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Owns the financial position: planning, budgeting, forecasting, unit economics, cash, and the numbers the business is run and reported on. Use this to build or challenge a budget, model a decision's financial consequence, assess unit economics or runway, evaluate an investment or spend request, set financial controls, or when a plan's numbers do not reconcile. Also use to decide whether the business can afford something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides whether and how to enter a new market — sizing demand from the bottom up rather than from a market report, testing whether your advantage transfers, choosing between organic entry, partnership and acquisition, sequencing the operational and regulatory work that entry actually requires, and setting the criteria that would tell you to stop. Use this to evaluate a new geography, segment or vertical, pressure-test an entry plan, or work out why a launched market never reached scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extends a mechanistic or association-level biomedical finding into a staged validation pathway that moves from descriptive evidence toward stronger functional support, mechanistic specificity, and clinical relevance. Use this skill when a user has a pathway, biomarker, cell-state, target, mechanism, or association finding and needs to decide what should be validated next, in what order, and which evidence layers are necessary versus optional. Do not default to maximal validation stacks. Build a structured validation ladder with a primary route, stronger upgrade route, and optional extensions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Govern how the design system evolves — SemVer for tokens/components, the contribution workflow, deprecation policy, and change communication. Use when the user wants to add/promote/deprecate a component or token, decide a version bump, set up a contribution process, or keep the system from fragmenting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Playwriting for banqiang-system Chinese opera (板腔体：京剧、豫剧、越剧、秦腔、评剧、沪剧、淮剧、川剧弹戏), where sung passages are paired seven- or ten-character lines varied by metre (板式) rather than filled into fixed tune patterns. Covers genre (唱工戏／做工戏／武戏), the main line, technical structure and 排场, how 行当 and a named star decide the writing, 程式, lyric craft (唱词：上下句、重点句、垛句、辙口), 宾白 and the sung/spoken seam, duets, what the writer marks on the page (Peking-opera vs Yue-opera style), the interface with actors and musicians, restoring old plays, and three contemporary routes including 现代戏. Sources; 范钧宏、翁偶虹、刘吉典、樊尚林、张庚郭汉城、罗怀臻、陆军, plus full scripts (锁麟囊／沙家浜／白蛇传／朝阳沟／潘金莲). Use when writing or revising 唱词, choosing 板式, writing for a performer or role-type, adapting a traditional play, writing a 现代戏, judging a project's genre, marking 锣鼓, or drawing the boundary before general dramaturgy skills apply. Not for 元杂剧/传奇/昆曲, which are the qupai system; see sw-chinese-opera-qupai.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use under time pressure when the situation is still changing and you must act before certainty — cycle Observe→Orient→Decide→Act on ~70% confidence, then re-observe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before heavy deliberation, classify the decision as cheap or costly to undo; decide two-way doors fast and stage one-way doors to preserve options.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidate freshness-gated newsjack signals and route them by client standing before angle generation. Collapses any remaining same-story duplicates, decides strong/partial/none standing with a journalist-shape sanity check, and sorts each story into pitch_ready, big_story (always-surfaced suggestion), or watch. Never writes angles or pitches, and never drops a fresh big story.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide which single journalist at one publication to approach first with a pitch. Fit-checks each candidate through journalist-fit-check, then ranks the survivors on the comparative signals that separate colleagues at the same masthead (topic ownership, format match, staff vs. contributor, publishing cadence, recent story types, source-type match), and returns one first pick with tailoring notes plus a held fallback order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recover the first public timestamp and canonical major coverage for a newsjacking signal, then decide whether newer coverage is the same story, a different story, or a materially new development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor current news and reaction signals, then decide which are credible newsjacking opportunities for a client. Uses the local monitoring engine for evidence, but the skill owns PR judgment, brand safety, standing, decay, angle fit, and handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search past meeting transcripts and voice memos for specific topics, people, decisions, or ideas. Use this whenever the user asks "what did we discuss about X", "find that meeting where we talked about Y", "what did Alex say", "did we decide on", "what was that idea about", or any question that could be answered by searching their meeting history. Also use for "do I have any notes about" or "check my meetings for".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-meeting debrief — analyzes what happened, compares outcomes to your prep intentions, tracks decision evolution. Use when the user says "debrief", "what just happened in that meeting", "what did we decide", "debrief that call", "post-meeting", "what changed", or right after stopping a recording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release", "cut a release", "ship a new version", or "bump and publish" brooks-lint. Do NOT trigger for: propagating an already-decided version without releasing (use `npm run bump` directly), CHANGELOG edits alone, or questions about the release process that don't ask to perform it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。