「assess」の検索結果

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en transformation digitale (strategy, change management, technology adoption, maturity assessment)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EdTech Specialist IA — Expert en technologies éducatives (LMS, SCORM, adaptive learning, gamification, assessment)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en création de cours avancé (curriculum, video, LMS, assessments, community, monetization)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en audit interne (risk assessment, controls, compliance, recommendations, DZ context)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects. Analyze the codebase to uncover debt, assess its impact, and create acti

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects. Analyze the codebase to uncover debt, assess its impact, and create acti

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Rails apps and provide upgrade assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Name what was prioritized, what was sacrificed, and whether the tradeoff was right. Every design decision trades something. Use when evaluating design decisions, defending choices, or helping teams understand what they're giving up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a designer's taste through their typography decisions alone. Type is the fastest taste signal in any design. Use when evaluating design maturity, assessing portfolio quality, or understanding what typography reveals about design thinking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose your taste gaps across six skill areas. Know what to practice. Use when starting a taste development program, checking progress, or identifying specific areas to improve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: assessing how much context a deployed agent profile consumes before real work starts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: a general codebase assessment, pre-migration/pre-rewrite review, or explicit security-focused request needs a structured, repeatable security audit pass covering hardcoded secrets, injection-prone constructs, auth/debug backdoors, and insecure config defaults. Complements (does not replace) the built-in /security-review command. Not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytical methodology skill for intelligence-grade research. Covers cognitive security, logical fallacy detection, source epistemology, and probability discipline. Load when evaluating sources, building analytical assessments, or detecting manipulation in information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest WordPress sites", "scan WordPress for vulnerabilities", "enumerate WordPress users, themes, or plugins", "exploit WordPress vulnerabilities", or "use WPScan". It provides comprehensive WordPress security assessment methodologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "identify web application vulnerabilities", "explain common security flaws", "understand vulnerability categories", "learn about injection attacks", "review access control weaknesses", "analyze API security issues", "assess security misconfigurations", "understand client-side vulnerabilities", "examine mobile and IoT security flaws", or "reference the OWASP-aligned vulnerability taxonomy". Use this skill to provide comprehensive vulnerability definitions, root causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies across all major web security categories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "perform SMTP penetration testing", "enumerate email users", "test for open mail relays", "grab SMTP banners", "brute force email credentials", or "assess mail server security". It provides comprehensive techniques for testing SMTP server security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。