「appeal」の検索結果

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces structured U.S. appellate document summaries mapping procedural posture, issues on appeal, standards of review, and competing arguments into memo-ready format. Use when summarizing appellate briefs, notices of appeal, records on appeal, or preparing for oral argument. Triggers: appeal, appellate, notice of appeal, standard of review, cross-appeal, appellate brief intake, record on appeal synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode an insurance claim denial letter — what the cited reason actually means, whether it's commonly overturnable, and the appeal letter that answers it point by point. Use when someone asks 'my insurance claim was denied what do I do', 'decode this denial letter', 'can I appeal this denial', or 'write my insurance appeal'. Produces the denial decode with overturn-likelihood framing, the evidence checklist, the point-by-point appeal letter, and the escalation ladder past the insurer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to appeal a MetLife pet insurance claim, dispute a denial, challenge an underpayment, draft an appeal letter, review an EOB for appeal grounds, or fight a pet insurance claim decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write insurance appeal letters with documentation. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with insurance-appeal related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claims Appeals agent for healthcare workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write claims denial appeal letters with documentation. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with claims-denial-appeal related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a FRAP 26.1-compliant Certificate of Interested Persons identifying all parties, entities, and affiliates with financial or legal interests in a federal appeal. Adapts to circuit-specific local rules. Use when filing appeals, corporate disclosure statements, or conflict-of-interest certificates in U.S. Courts of Appeals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured analytical summaries of appellate documents covering procedural posture, issues on appeal, standards of review, and strategic assessment. Use when onboarding to an appeal, preparing for oral argument, evaluating appellate risk, or summarizing the appellate record.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Binance P2P trading assistant for natural-language queries about P2P/C2C market ads, the user's own P2P order history, order detail & appeal tracking, and advertisement publish & management. Use when the user asks about P2P prices, searching/choosing ads, comparing payment methods, reviewing P2P order history, checking order detail/appeal status, querying complaints, publishing/updating/managing P2P advertisements, or viewing merchant profiles. Do NOT use for spot/futures prices, exchange trading, deposits/withdrawals, on-chain transfers, or anything unrelated to P2P/C2C.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interact with Kleros Curate registries across Ethereum Mainnet, Gnosis Chain, and Sepolia. Use when the user mentions Curate, Light Curate/LightGeneralizedTCR/LGTCR, Stake Curate/PermanentGTCR/PGTCR, Scout, token-curated registry/TCR, token lists, address/CDN tags, Goldsky, MetaEvidence, Verify Your List, or Curate calls such as addItem, removeItem, challengeItem, challengeRequest, and fundAppeal. Covers registry discovery and queries; policy/schema inspection; submissions, removals, challenges, evidence, appeals, rewards, execution; factory deployment; and frontend verification on all three networks. Also trigger for registry/list operations paired with Kleros, arbitrator, dispute, juror, or PNK context, and whenever the user names or tests kleros-curate. Do NOT use for non-Kleros registries or generic IPFS uploads without Curate context; route standalone uploads to kleros-ipfs-upload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Account suspension prevention and appeal — policy violations, Plan of Action writing, reinstatement process

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Catalog of informal fallacies with definitions, canonical examples, and detection heuristics. Covers relevance fallacies (ad hominem, straw man, red herring, appeal to authority, appeal to emotion), presumption fallacies (false dichotomy, complex question, begging the question), ambiguity fallacies (equivocation, amphiboly, accent), causal fallacies (post hoc, slippery slope, correlation-causation), and statistical fallacies (hasty generalization, cherry-picking). Use when evaluating arguments for rhetorical or informal reasoning errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

账号被限流/异常/担心操作触发风控/需要恢复时用：先自检from:@用户名搜不到即限流→区分临时标签(等24h不动账号)与正式标签(写申诉邮件+48h不操作)→复盘触发原因预防复发。Trigger："推文搜不到了""被限流了""账号异常""触发风控""临时标签""怎么申诉""shadowbanned""account suspended""appeal suspension""tweets not showing up"。不适用：正常发内容没出问题(→内容创作skill)、新号开业装修养号(→x-account-setup)、没粉丝怎么起量(→x-cold-start-playbook)。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a verified U.S. appellate Bill of Costs itemizing taxable costs under FRAP 39 or state analogs. Trigger when the user needs to prepare, file, or tax appellate costs after judgment, or references FRAP 39, bill of costs on appeal, or appellate cost taxation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an itemized Bill of Costs on Appeal under FRAP 39 or state equivalent for the prevailing party to recover allowable appellate expenses. Triggers on appellate cost bill drafting, post-judgment cost recovery filings, or prevailing party cost submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive legal applications skill covering civil/criminal/administrative litigation workflows, trial defense strategies, legal document drafting (complaints, answers, appeals, retrial petitions, enforcement applications, representation opinions, defense statements, legal opinions, etc.), arbitration (commercial & labor), mediation, enforcement procedures, evidence rules, and litigation risk assessment. Trigger when users ask about: lawsuit/litigation/trial, legal documents, court defense, evidence/cross-examination, arbitration, enforcement, legal strategy, filing a case, appeal, retrial, representation, pleading, or any legal procedural guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and edit images and videos with an 85+ API portfolio and build visually appealing website pages via Pixelbin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before responding to pressure for agreement, manufactured urgency, authority appeals, or requests to certify unsupported claims; separate evidence from persuasion and state uncertainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "review this influencer content" or "check if this post meets brand guidelines"; runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback. Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper. 达人内容审核/发布前质检

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user's app or update was rejected by Apple App Review or Google Play Review and they need to diagnose why, fix it, and resubmit fast. Use when the user mentions "app rejected", "App Review rejection", "guideline violation", "Apple rejected my app", "Google Play rejected", "Play policy violation", "Resolution Center", "metadata rejection", "binary rejection", "guideline 2.1", "guideline 4.3", "guideline 5.1.1", "Sign in with Apple required", "Apple ID rejection", "Play Store suspension", "appeal", "I need to respond to App Review", or "expedited review". For pre-submission listing health, see aso-audit. For metadata-only fixes, see metadata-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a fair, enforceable community moderation policy. Use when standing up or overhauling moderation for a forum, Discord, Slack, subreddit, or any user community. Produces a clear code of conduct with examples, a graduated enforcement ladder tied to specific triggers, an appeals process, moderator guidelines, and the handling for the severe cases (threats, doxxing, brigading) that need immediate action. Governs member conduct in a user community — distinct from [[community-management-playbook]], which manages a brand's own social-media channels (comments, DMs, tone, response templates).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a fundraising case for support that makes donors want to give. Use when asked to write a case for support, a fundraising case statement, a major-gift or campaign case, or the core argument for a donation appeal. Produces a persuasive case — the need, your solution and why you, the impact a gift makes, specific funding opportunities with amounts, and a clear ask — donor-centred, not org-centred.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing an app for App Store submission, handling rejections or appeals, managing App Store Connect and Xcode Cloud, or triaging TestFlight/Sentry crash corpora. Covers checklists, metadata, privacy manifests, age ratings, export compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。