14 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Give a structured product design critique — user job clarity, hierarchy, affordance, error states, accessibility, and consistency — focused on what to change, in what order, and why.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get structured design feedback on usability, hierarchy, and consistency. Trigger with "review this design", "critique this mockup", "what do you think of this screen?", or when sharing a Figma link or screenshot for feedback at any stage from exploration to final polish.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an expert review against Nielsen's heuristics and domain criteria, with severity ratings. Use when you need findings without recruiting participants. For a facilitated team feedback session, use `design-critique` (design-ops).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish review gates — criteria, checkpoints, and approval flow. Use when work ships without consistent review. For running one individual session, use `design-critique`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate a structured team critique — framing, feedback rules, and actionable outcomes. Use when running a session with people in the room. For a solo expert review, use `heuristic-evaluation` (prototyping-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate structured design critiques with clear feedback frameworks and actionable outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, interaction states, and micro-details before shipping. Executes changes (unlike design-audit and design-critique which are report-only). Triggers on polish, finishing touches, final pass, something looks off, pre-launch, good to great.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate design from a UX perspective with Nielsen's heuristics scoring, anti-pattern detection, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Report-only. Triggers on critique, UX review, design feedback, how does this look, evaluate the design, component review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Critique a design for usability, hierarchy, and accessibility. Use when the user says "critique this design", "review this screen", "what's wrong with this UI", "design feedback", "UX review", "how can I improve this", "review my mockup", "is this good UX", or shares a design and wants structured feedback - even if they don't explicitly say "design critique".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run structured design critiques with frameworks for feedback that is honest, specific, and actionable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when critiquing a system design across correctness, scalability, reliability, maintainability, and observability using probe-first questioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run taste-informed design reviews using Observation > Principle > Question. Use when facilitating design critiques, improving feedback quality on a team, or building a shared vocabulary for quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。