本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

documentation-quality

Documentation quality standards and writing principles. Use when establishing formatting rules, reviewing doc quality metrics, creating writing guidelines, or enforcing consistent documentation style across a project.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md4.4 KB
  • LICENSE.txt1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Documentation Quality Standards

Use this skill when documentation should be judged against explicit standards instead of subjective preference.

  • Leverage native parallel subagent dispatch and 200k+ context windows where available.

Activation Conditions

Use symptom -> action triggers: when one matches, apply this skill and verify with the protocol below.

  • Reviewing docs before merge
  • Creating or updating a style guide
  • Defining expectations for examples, structure, and terminology
  • Auditing a docs set for consistency and readability

Core Standards

  • Clear audience and scope
  • Stable heading hierarchy
  • Runnable or honest examples
  • Consistent terminology
  • Explicit edge cases, constraints, and failure modes

Documentation Stack Reference

Inherit the shared stack from documentation-patterns: source-of-truth discovery, audience framing, structure selection, verification, and freshness checks. Keep this skill focused on quality gates instead of restating the full stack.

Anti-Patterns

  • Writing for the author instead of the reader: It bakes in unstated context and leaves the actual audience unsure what to do next.
  • Skipping concrete examples or commands: Abstract guidance is easy to approve and hard to apply correctly.
  • Letting links, screenshots, or versions drift: Polished formatting does not help if the instructions are no longer true.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The Documentation Quality output identifies audience, purpose, source of truth, and freshness requirements.
  2. Pass/fail: Shared documentation-stack guidance is referenced instead of duplicating another documentation skill.
  3. Pass/fail: Claims, links, commands, examples, and screenshots are verified or explicitly marked unverified.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Apply the skill to a doc request with a stale command, missing owner, and conflicting audience.
  5. Success metric: Zero undocumented assumptions; every reader-facing claim is sourced or scoped.

Quality Checklist

  • Title and purpose are clear
  • Heading levels do not jump unexpectedly
  • Code examples have language tags and realistic inputs
  • Commands match current tooling
  • Links and file paths are accurate

Cross-Skill Workflow

  • Use documentation-authoring when the content itself still needs to be drafted or clarified.
  • Use documentation-patterns when the review shows that the problem is document shape rather than wording.
  • Use this skill as the final standards check before publish or merge.

Agent Prompt Template

Use the documentation-quality skill to review this document against explicit standards.
Artifact: [file or pasted draft].
Audience: [who will read it].
Check for clarity, completeness, accurate examples, terminology consistency, and stale references.
Report concrete findings first, then suggest the smallest high-value fixes.

References & Resources

Documentation

Scripts

  • Doc Style Audit - Check Markdown files for heading jumps, long lines, tabs, and trailing whitespace
<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/documentation-quality and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: None required

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the Documentation Quality Standards skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • If the current host does not expose a matching server, use the bundled references, scripts, native toolchain, and manual workflow already described in this skill.
  • Treat direct local verification, rendered output, logs, tests, or screenshots as the fallback evidence path before completion.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

  • documentation-authoring: Use it when the workflow also needs drafting structured technical or product documents.
  • documentation-patterns: Use it when the workflow also needs reusable documentation structures and templates.
  • documentation-verification: Use it when the workflow also needs final documentation validation before publishing.
  • notion-docs: Use it when the workflow also needs Notion page and database publishing workflows.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

bg-szy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する