本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

word-document

Word (.docx) manipulation via MCP server. Use for reading, creating, editing, formatting Word documents including tables, footnotes, comments, images, headers, styles, and PDF conversion.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md4.9 KB
  • LICENSE.txt1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Word Document Workflows

Tech Stack Target / Version: Word desktop or python-docx automation with current OOXML-compatible workflows.

Use this skill when .docx layout and document structure matter, not just the raw text.

  • Leverage native parallel subagent dispatch and 200k+ context windows where available.

Current MCP Reality

Microsoft publicly documents a Word MCP server in the Microsoft 365 Agents Toolkit preview, but tool availability still depends on the host. In GitHub Copilot you may see Word-specific tools; in other clients they may be missing. If direct Word MCP access is unavailable, use the included local script workflow.

Activation Conditions

Use symptom -> action triggers: when one matches, apply this skill and verify with the protocol below.

  • Creating or editing .docx reports, memos, or structured deliverables
  • Applying headings, tables, images, or styles
  • Reviewing or extracting document structure
  • Preparing Word output before a later PDF conversion

Practical Workflow

  1. Confirm whether the client exposes Word MCP capabilities.
  2. Start with structure: title, headings, sections, tables.
  3. Apply styling consistently only after the structure is right.
  4. Validate comments, footnotes, and references before export.
  5. Use the local generator script when MCP access is unavailable.

MCP Fallback – Native Automation

When MCP is unavailable, use native automation: python-docx for .docx, direct OOXML inspection for unsupported structures, and PDF export checks when layout matters. Preserve styles, tables, headers, footers, comments, tracked-change expectations, and metadata, then reopen or parse the document before claiming success.

Anti-Patterns

  • Writing for the author instead of the reader: It bakes in unstated context and leaves the actual audience unsure what to do next.
  • Skipping concrete examples or commands: Abstract guidance is easy to approve and hard to apply correctly.
  • Letting links, screenshots, or versions drift: Polished formatting does not help if the instructions are no longer true.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The Word Document artifact type, target format, and required output fidelity are stated before editing.
  2. Pass/fail: MCP availability is checked and the native automation fallback path is named when MCP is absent.
  3. Pass/fail: The produced file or formula is opened, parsed, rendered, or otherwise validated locally.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Apply the workflow to a file with formatting, metadata, or conversion edge cases and verify nothing important is lost.
  5. Success metric: Zero unverified document claims; the artifact itself is the evidence.

Document Checklist

  • Heading hierarchy is clear
  • Tables are readable and consistently styled
  • Comments or review notes are intentional
  • Placeholder text is removed
  • The final document was re-opened or otherwise verified after generation

References & Resources

Documentation

Scripts

Examples

<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/word-document and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: Word Document MCP

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the Word Document Workflows skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • Use python-docx, Word desktop, or document export scripts when the MCP surface is unavailable.
  • Re-open or render the document locally so formatting, comments, and pagination are verified before delivery.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

bg-szy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する