複数ベンダーの年次サイバーセキュリティ報告書を探して取得し、脅威やランサムウェア、侵害統計の傾向を出典付きで比較・分析します。
- 脅威レポートをカテゴリ別に探したいとき
- 特定ベンダーの報告書を取得したいとき
- ランサムウェア動向を複数社で比較したいとき
実際の画像や文章を見て好みを採点し、その評価をもとに判定役の基準を調整します。調整後の一致度も確認できます。
Calibrates any eval against the principal's own taste: takes a task in plain words, finds the eval suites and targets that cover it and offers them as options, then shows N real outputs (images or text, default 16, any count like 4, 24 or 64) on a local review page, collects a 0–10 score per output plus optional typed notes, measures how well the judge agrees, distills a taste profile the judge reads from then on, and rescores to prove the change. USE WHEN calibrate, calibrate 16, calibrate 64, calibrate social posts, calibrate the art judge, calibrate this eval, show me outputs to rate, rate these images, teach the eval what I like, tune the eval to my taste, what does the judge get wrong about my taste, calibration session. NOT FOR measuring a suite's judge against existing labels without a session (Assay Calibrate), recording one verdict on one delivered artifact (ArtDirection Calibrate), or producing the artifacts themselves (Art).
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見る評価対象となる作業を普段の言葉で伝えると、関連する評価スイートや設定済みの対象を探し、候補として提示します。選んだ対象について、実際に作成された画像や文章をローカルのレビュー画面に表示し、各出力を0〜10点で採点できます。文章の場合は生成時のプロンプトも確認でき、必要に応じてコメントを添えられます。採点結果から、既存の判定役が人の評価とどの程度一致するかを測り、好みの傾向を根拠付きのTaste.jsonにまとめます。そのプロファイルを判定役が後続の評価で参照し、再採点で変化を確認できます。
画像や投稿文など、評価の基準に自分の好みを反映させたいときに向いています。判定役がどの出力を高く評価し、どこで人の判断と食い違うのかを見たい場合や、好みを反映した後の評価を確かめたい場合にも使えます。
初回設定にはConfig.mdなどの設定が必要です。レビュー画面で本人が送信した採点だけが評価ラベルとして記録されます。判定役の再採点では画像ごとに複数回のビジョン判定が発生する場合があります。評価対象そのものの制作や、既存ラベルだけを使ったセッションなしの判定精度測定には使いません。
この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(OpenAI Codex)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。
SKILL.md の記述から、注意が要る操作と導入の前提を AI が確認しました。点数は実際に動かした結果(実行検証)だけで付けています。
点数には入れていません。 2026年10月28日 時点で AI(OpenAI Codex)が判定しました。目安なので、入れる前に原文も確認してください。
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Contents: Ideal State · Intent Routing · Tool · How taste reaches the judge · Data & Config · Gotchas · Examples
A judge that disagrees with the principal is grading against someone else's taste. Calibrate closes that gap for anything that has an eval. Every Assay suite is a target with no setup: its stored run outputs are the pool and its judged asserts are the judge. Image intents join through a configured target. The principal names a task in plain words, discover ranks the targets and suites that cover it, and the principal picks one.
Outputs are shown blind (no judge scores on the page), and text outputs show the prompt that produced them. The principal scores each one 0–10 on a slider, with a note when it matters; a score at or above the target's likeAt (default 7) counts as a like for pass/fail agreement, and the raw score is kept. The labels answer three things: how often the current judge agrees, where its cut-off should sit to match the principal, and what the principal actually values. The last becomes Taste.json, which the judge reads on every later run.
LIFEOS/TOOLS/lib/Calibration.ts.| Intent | Trigger | File |
|---|---|---|
| Run | "calibrate", "calibrate 24 social posts", "show me outputs to rate" | Intents/Run.md |
| Report | "how well does the judge match me", "calibration report" | Intents/Report.md |
| Distill | "update the taste profile", "what have I told you I like" | Intents/Distill.md |
| AddTarget | "calibrate a new image intent", "add a calibration target" | Intents/AddTarget.md |
| File | Read when |
|---|---|
Tools/Calibrate.help.md | the full CLI contract behind the command table below |
Setup.md | first-time setup: the optional Config.md and PREFERENCES.md keys and a proof it works |
bun skills/Calibrate/Tools/Calibrate.ts <command> from the config root. Full contract: Tools/Calibrate.help.md.
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
discover "<task>" | Rank configured targets and every eval suite against a plain-words task; unusable ones (no stored outputs) rank last |
targets | List configured targets |
pool --target <t> | Pool size, scored share, labeled share, score bands |
session --target <t> --count N --open | Serve the review page on loopback, block until submit (exit 0) or timeout (exit 3) |
report --target <t> [--session <id>] [--rescored] [--json] | Judge-vs-principal agreement |
taste-input --target <t> | Every current label with notes, for Distill |
taste --target <t> --write <draft.json> | Validate citations, stamp provenance, write Taste.json |
rescore --target <t> [--session <id>] [--repeats 1] [--dry-run] | Re-run the target's judge with the current taste |
--target takes a configured target or any eval suite name.
EvalRunner appends the rendered profile to every judged assert of a suite whose name (or calibration: field) matches a target with a Taste.json. calibration: none opts a suite out. A new profile changes the rubric text, so that suite's Assay calibration record goes stale until re-measured, which is intended.Critique.ts adds the profile to its rubric prompt whenever the brief carries "calibration": "<target>".LIFEOS/TOOLS/lib/CalibrateTaste.ts because both skills read it.Targets, labels, sessions and taste profiles live at <configRoot>/LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Calibrate/ (configRoot is $CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR when set, else ~/.claude). If the directory does not exist, the AddTarget intent creates it.
Under LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Calibrate/Targets/<target>/ (override the root with LIFEOS_CALIBRATE_DIR; stored eval outputs are read from LIFEOS/MEMORY/STATE/Evals-Results/, override with LIFEOS_EVALS_RESULTS_DIR):
target.json: only for configured targets. Name, title, the question shown on the page, the owning skill and intent, pools, the judge brief and bar, plus optional selection (newest or spread), count (the session default, 16 when unset) and likeAt. Pool kinds are evals (suite: that suite's stored outputs with its judge's verdicts), frontmatter (published documents whose frontmatter names an image: the real published outputs; needs imageField and localRoot), evalround (EvalRound.json records, which carry the art panel's scores) and files (a glob of images or .txt/.md; groupPattern is a regex whose first capture names the source round). An eval suite used directly needs no target.json.Brief.json: the ArtDirection brief used by rescore on image targets. A target with neither a brief nor "judge": "evals" is labels-only: rescore skips it with that reason, and report measures the labels against the judge snapshot its pool carried.labels.jsonl: one principal label per line, append-only. Only the page's submit writes it.sessions/<id>.json, Taste.json, rescore.jsonl: tracked. artifacts/ (content-addressed copies of labeled outputs), rescore/ and hash-cache.json are local-only.Beside Targets/, two optional files hold the install's own values:
Config.md: frontmatter browser, the app session --open opens the page in (open -a <app>; default for the system default browser). With no Config.md the page opens in the system default browser and the tool warns, naming the file; a Config.md without the key stops the open with an error naming the file and key.PREFERENCES.md: the principal's standing notes on what they score first, read by AddTarget when it writes a target's question and brief. Labels and Taste.json stay the evidence.The installer puts a starter for both in LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Calibrate/; if one is missing, bun ~/.claude/skills/LifeOS/Tools/ScaffoldUser.ts --apply copies any missing starter file into place and never overwrites one you have edited. First-time setup is in Setup.md.
Agreement floors come from LIFEOS/TOOLS/lib/Calibration.ts, the one definition the Assay skill uses too.
label_source.kind is always principal and always came from the page.artifacts/, and labels point at the copy, so rescoring still works after the source is gone.History.md when present).report --rescored prints which taste version judged each output and leaves out every label that version was distilled from.--dry-run prints the count first.Example 1: Any task with an eval
User: "calibrate 20 story explanations"
→ discover ranks storyexplanation-cse first; one clear match, so it is used and named
→ page shows 20 stored outputs, each with the prompt that produced it
→ rescore, report, then Distill; the suite's judge reads the taste on its next run
Example 2: An ambiguous task
User: "calibrate the voice stuff"
→ discover returns several voice suites; AskUserQuestion offers the top four with output counts
Example 3: Checking the judge
User: "how well does the art judge match me now?"
→ Report: agreement, kappa, earned or not, best cut, per-vendor, disagreements with notes
Example 4: A new image intent
User: "calibrate the YouTube thumbnails too"
→ AddTarget: target.json with the thumbnail pools, question and brief; pool count; then Run
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
複数ベンダーの年次サイバーセキュリティ報告書を探して取得し、脅威やランサムウェア、侵害統計の傾向を出典付きで比較・分析します。
個別の機能や部品の設計と、システム全体の目的を同じ問いで比較し、両者の食い違い、適切な実装範囲、全体との整合性を3段階で整理するスキルです。
文章のテーマに合う格言や引用を探し、著者・出典と選定理由を添えて提案します。引用の追加、思想家の調査、利用履歴の管理を通じて、同じ引用の繰り返しも防ぎます。
ブログの挿絵や技術図解、比較図、マンガ、アイコンなどを用途別の手順で制作します。形式に合う構図や配色を組み立て、確認用の画像を出力します。
画像や映像、スライド、サイト画面の品質を複数の判定役で評価し、修正点の整理から基準を満たした成果物の引き渡しまで進めます。
arXivの論文をテーマ・分野・論文IDで探し、著者や要旨、リンクをまとめます。新着論文の確認や、用意されている場合はAlphaXivのAI生成概要の取得にも対応します。