本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ax-gepa

This skill helps an LLM generate correct AxGEPA optimization code using @ax-llm/ax. Use when the user asks about AxGEPA, GEPA, Pareto optimization, multi-objective prompt tuning, reflective prompt evolution, validationExamples, maxMetricCalls, or optimizing a generator, flow, or agent tree.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diogenesoftoronto/keatingスター 36(GitHub 36 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールOpenAI

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

AxGEPA Codegen Rules (@ax-llm/ax)

Use this skill to generate direct AxGEPA optimization code. Prefer short, modern, copyable patterns over long explanation.

Use These Defaults

  • Use new AxGEPA({ studentAI, teacherAI, ... }).
  • Prefer ai(), ax(), and flow() for new code.
  • Use a strong teacherAI and a cheaper studentAI.
  • Always pass validationExamples to compile().
  • Always set maxMetricCalls to bound optimizer cost.
  • Use scalar metrics for one objective and object metrics for Pareto optimization.
  • Apply results with program.applyOptimization(result.optimizedProgram!).
  • For tree-wide runs, expect optimizedProgram.instructionMap.

Critical Rules

  • AxGEPA.compile() works for a single generator and for tree-aware roots such as flows or agents with registered instruction-bearing descendants.
  • There is no separate flow-only GEPA optimizer. Use AxGEPA for flows too.
  • The metric may return either number or Record<string, number>.
  • Keep metrics deterministic and cheap by default.
  • Avoid extra LLM calls inside the metric unless the user explicitly wants judge-based evaluation.
  • If the user needs LLM-as-judge scoring for a non-agent GEPA run, prefer a plain typed AxGen evaluator instead of writing a custom judge abstraction.
  • maxMetricCalls must be large enough to cover the initial validation pass over validationExamples.
  • GEPA optimizes instructions. If a tree has no instruction-bearing nodes, optimization will fail.
  • Use held-out validation examples for selection. Do not reuse the training set as validationExamples.
  • result.optimizedProgram is the easy-to-apply best candidate. result.paretoFront is the full trade-off set for multi-objective runs.

Metric Selection

Choose the evaluation path deliberately:

  • Prefer a deterministic metric when correctness can be read directly from prediction and example.
  • Prefer a deterministic metric when cost, latency, recursion depth, or tool count matters.
  • Use a plain typed AxGen evaluator only when the task is genuinely qualitative and hard to score exactly.
  • For agent.optimize(...), prefer the built-in judge path instead of manually wrapping a judge metric.

Rule of thumb:

  • AxGEPA on AxGen or flow: use a metric first, optionally a plain typed AxGen evaluator if needed.
  • agent.optimize(...): use custom metric for crisp scoring, otherwise judgeAI plus judgeOptions.

Canonical Scalar Pattern

import { ai, ax, AxAIOpenAIModel, AxGEPA } from '@ax-llm/ax';

const student = ai({
  name: 'openai',
  apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY!,
  config: { model: AxAIOpenAIModel.GPT4OMini },
});

const teacher = ai({
  name: 'openai',
  apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY!,
  config: { model: AxAIOpenAIModel.GPT4O },
});

const classifier = ax(
  'emailText:string -> priority:class "high, normal, low", rationale:string'
);

const train = [
  { emailText: 'URGENT: Server down!', priority: 'high' },
  { emailText: 'Weekly newsletter', priority: 'low' },
];

const validation = [
  { emailText: 'Invoice overdue', priority: 'high' },
  { emailText: 'Lunch plans?', priority: 'low' },
];

const metric = ({ prediction, example }: { prediction: any; example: any }) =>
  prediction?.priority === example?.priority ? 1 : 0;

const optimizer = new AxGEPA({
  studentAI: student,
  teacherAI: teacher,
  numTrials: 12,
  minibatch: true,
  minibatchSize: 4,
  earlyStoppingTrials: 4,
  sampleCount: 1,
});

const result = await optimizer.compile(classifier, train, metric, {
  validationExamples: validation,
  maxMetricCalls: 120,
});

classifier.applyOptimization(result.optimizedProgram!);
console.log(result.bestScore);

Canonical Pareto Pattern

import { ai, flow, AxAIOpenAIModel, AxGEPA } from '@ax-llm/ax';

const student = ai({
  name: 'openai',
  apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY!,
  config: { model: AxAIOpenAIModel.GPT4OMini },
});

const teacher = ai({
  name: 'openai',
  apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY!,
  config: { model: AxAIOpenAIModel.GPT4O },
});

const wf = flow<{ emailText: string }>()
  .n('classifier', 'emailText:string -> priority:class "high, normal, low"')
  .n(
    'rationale',
    'emailText:string, priority:string -> rationale:string "One concise sentence"'
  )
  .e('classifier', (state) => ({ emailText: state.emailText }))
  .e('rationale', (state) => ({
    emailText: state.emailText,
    priority: state.classifierResult.priority,
  }))
  .r((state) => ({
    priority: state.classifierResult.priority,
    rationale: state.rationaleResult.rationale,
  }));

const train = [
  { emailText: 'URGENT: Server down!', priority: 'high' },
  { emailText: 'Weekly newsletter', priority: 'low' },
];

const validation = [
  { emailText: 'Invoice overdue', priority: 'high' },
  { emailText: 'Lunch plans?', priority: 'low' },
];

const metric = ({ prediction, example }: { prediction: any; example: any }) => {
  const accuracy = prediction?.priority === example?.priority ? 1 : 0;
  const rationale = typeof prediction?.rationale === 'string'
    ? prediction.rationale
    : '';
  const brevity = rationale.length <= 40 ? 1 : rationale.length <= 80 ? 0.5 : 0.1;
  return { accuracy, brevity };
};

const result = await new AxGEPA({
  studentAI: student,
  teacherAI: teacher,
  numTrials: 16,
  minibatch: true,
  minibatchSize: 6,
  earlyStoppingTrials: 5,
  sampleCount: 1,
}).compile(wf, train, metric, {
  validationExamples: validation,
  maxMetricCalls: 240,
});

for (const point of result.paretoFront) {
  console.log(point.scores, point.configuration);
}

wf.applyOptimization(result.optimizedProgram!);
console.log(result.optimizedProgram?.instructionMap);

Metric Patterns

// Scalar objective
const scalarMetric = ({ prediction, example }) =>
  prediction.answer === example.answer ? 1 : 0;

// Multi-objective
const multiMetric = ({ prediction, example }) => ({
  accuracy: prediction.answer === example.answer ? 1 : 0,
  brevity:
    typeof prediction?.reasoning === 'string' &&
    prediction.reasoning.length < 120
      ? 1
      : 0.2,
});
  • Return plain numbers or plain object literals.
  • Keep objective names stable across calls.
  • Prefer normalized scores such as 0..1 so trade-offs are easy to reason about.

Result Handling

const { optimizedProgram, paretoFront } = result;

program.applyOptimization(optimizedProgram!);

// Save for later
const saved = JSON.stringify(optimizedProgram);

// Load later and re-apply
const loaded = JSON.parse(saved);
program.applyOptimization(loaded);
  • Single-target runs usually populate both optimizedProgram.instruction and optimizedProgram.instructionMap.
  • Tree-wide runs rely on instructionMap, keyed by full program ID.
  • Pareto points expose candidate configs under point.configuration.instructionMap.

Useful Options

const optimizer = new AxGEPA({
  studentAI,
  teacherAI,
  numTrials: 20,
  minibatch: true,
  minibatchSize: 5,
  minibatchFullEvalSteps: 5,
  earlyStoppingTrials: 5,
  minImprovementThreshold: 0,
  sampleCount: 1,
  seed: 42,
  verbose: true,
});
  • numTrials: number of reflection/evolution rounds.
  • minibatch: reduce per-round evaluation cost.
  • minibatchSize: examples per minibatch.
  • earlyStoppingTrials: stop after repeated non-improvement.
  • minImprovementThreshold: reject tiny gains below this threshold.
  • seed: stabilize sampling during demos and tests.

Budgeting and Validation

  • Always create distinct train and validationExamples arrays.
  • Size maxMetricCalls for at least one full validation pass plus several rounds.
  • If the user wants a strict budget, say so explicitly and set maxMetricCalls.
  • For expensive trees, start with auto: 'light' or fewer numTrials, then scale up.

Troubleshooting

  • Error about maxMetricCalls being too small: increase it until the initial validation pass fits.
  • Empty or poor Pareto front: verify the metric returns numbers for every example.
  • No tree optimization effect: ensure child programs are registered under the root and have instructions to mutate.
  • Saved optimization applies only partly: use program.applyOptimization(...), not just setInstruction(...), so instructionMap reaches the full tree.

Good Example Targets

  • /Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/gepa.ts
  • /Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/gepa-flow.ts
  • /Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/gepa-train-inference.ts
  • /Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/gepa-quality-vs-speed-optimization.ts

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Use when the user wants to learn, be taught, be quizzed, or understand an idea across any domain — science, math, philosophy, code, law, politics, psychology, medicine, arts, or history — with active scaffolding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diogenesoftoronto/keating362026年10月20日 更新

ax

無料

This skill helps with using the @ax-llm/ax TypeScript library for building LLM applications. Use when the user asks about ax(), ai(), f(), s(), agent(), flow(), AxGen, AxAgent, AxFlow, signatures, streaming, or mentions @ax-llm/ax.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diogenesoftoronto/keating362026年10月20日 更新

ax-agent

無料

This skill helps an LLM generate correct AxAgent code using @ax-llm/ax. Use when the user asks about agent(), child agents, namespaced functions, discovery mode, shared fields, llmQuery(...), RLM code execution, recursionOptions, or agent runtime behavior. For tuning and eval with agent.optimize(...), use ax-agent-optimize.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diogenesoftoronto/keating362026年10月20日 更新

This skill helps an LLM generate correct AxAgent tuning and evaluation code using @ax-llm/ax. Use when the user asks about agent.optimize(...), judgeOptions, eval datasets, optimization targets, saved optimizedProgram artifacts, or recursive optimization guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diogenesoftoronto/keating362026年10月20日 更新

ax-ai

無料

This skill helps an LLM generate correct AI provider setup and configuration code using @ax-llm/ax. Use when the user asks about ai(), providers, models, presets, embeddings, extended thinking, context caching, or mentions OpenAI/Anthropic/Google/Azure/Groq/DeepSeek/Mistral/Cohere/Together/Ollama/HuggingFace/Reka/OpenRouter with @ax-llm/ax.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diogenesoftoronto/keating362026年10月20日 更新

ax-flow

無料

This skill helps an LLM generate correct AxFlow workflow code using @ax-llm/ax. Use when the user asks about flow(), AxFlow, workflow orchestration, parallel execution, DAG workflows, conditional routing, map/reduce patterns, or multi-node AI pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diogenesoftoronto/keating362026年10月20日 更新

Diogenesoftoronto のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する