本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開日本語紹介

work-with-creators

ブランドに合う実在のクリエイターを公開情報から調べ、候補の比較、報酬の目安、依頼内容の下書きをまとめます。連絡や交渉は行わず、判断材料を用意します。

原文原文の説明を見る

Real creators and influencers, researched, priced and briefed. Use when the marketer says "find influencers", "which creators are worth paying, at what price?", "find real UGC creators to film for our ads", "who should we seed product to", "is this creator's engagement real", "what should I pay this creator" or "write a creator brief". Free research first; one credit yes only to vet deeper. Drafts only: contacts nobody, agrees nothing, moves no money. Not for AI-made UGC-style video — use goose-video; if unsure, ask: a real person filming, or AI-made?

gooseworks-ai/goose-skillsスター 1,272(GitHub 1,272 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

こんなときに便利

  • 広告に合うクリエイターを探したいとき
  • 公開情報から候補の反応を比べたいとき
  • 報酬の目安と依頼文を準備したいとき

日本語での紹介

できること

ブランドや商品、競合の情報をもとに、実在するクリエイター候補を調べて比較します。公開投稿からフォロワー数や直近の再生数、広告投稿の割合、コメント、競合との取引などを確認し、日付とリンクを添えて候補ごとの確度を示します。価格帯の目安とその算出根拠、ギフティングや有料依頼などの案もまとめます。上位候補向けに、承認済みの訴求内容に配慮した依頼文と最初の連絡文の下書きを作り、レポートや候補一覧に整理します。

こんなときに便利

広告や商品紹介を依頼する相手を探したいとき、候補の反応が実際のものか公開情報で確認したいとき、依頼料や内容を検討したいときに役立ちます。候補の選定や予算の判断に必要な情報を先に揃えたいマーケター向けです。

使い方の例

  • 「この商品の紹介に合うクリエイターを探して、候補を比較してください」
  • 「この人の公開投稿を確認して、依頼料の目安を出してください」
  • 「候補者向けの依頼内容と最初の連絡文を下書きしてください」

注意点

調査は公開情報を使って行い、有料の追加調査には上限を示したうえで利用者の承認が必要です。連絡、交渉、契約、商品発送、支払いは行いません。AI生成のUGC風動画制作や法的助言も対象外です。

この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(OpenAI Codex)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。

含まれるファイル(13)

  • SKILL.md13.0 KB
  • references/creator-brief.md9.0 KB
  • references/creators-by-company-type.md3.9 KB
  • references/data-sources.md5.9 KB
  • references/discovery.md5.2 KB
  • references/first-message.md2.9 KB
  • references/pricing-and-deals.md9.3 KB
  • references/roster-format.md9.0 KB
  • references/run-memory.md3.9 KB
  • references/vetting.md14.0 KB
  • references/wave-criteria.md3.4 KB
  • skill.meta.json4.8 KB
  • tests/test-by-hand.md6.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

work-with-creators

Creator research answers three things for the marketer: who is worth paying, at what price, and what they should make for us. The craft is in the references (vetting.md, pricing-and-deals.md, creator-brief.md); this file is the order of work. Research half only: it drafts; the marketer sends, negotiates, ships and pays.

The rule that matters most: free pass first, report once (../marketing-guide/research-pattern.md (in the marketing-guide skill) — read it before the first search). Before the first message, find real creators and read their public pages — web search, the host browser on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube, competitors' posts and partnership ads — and build a draft shortlist with public engagement numbers and a rough price range. The marketer's first message from you is that report plus the few decisions that change the answer. Paid reads only deepen the vetting, with one credit yes. Never ask a fact the free pass could find.

What you get

  1. A readable report (creators/<YYYY-MM-DD>/report.md, opened on request): "In short" (write-report §1) — timely openings (a creator already posting about the category this week, a rival's creator deal ending), the shortlist — each pick with public numbers read from real posts, dated and linked, and how sure (confirmed / likely / first look), a price range with the math, a deal call, and For you ("this creator's format fits your <product> because…; what they'd make; the approved claim behind it, or 'you'd need proof of X first'") — You vs them (rivals' creator programmes vs yours), wave 1 and how it will be judged, near-misses, Decisions for you (budget, names, claims, a deeper vet), and "what we could not read". Shape: references/roster-format.md.
  2. The roster (creators/roster.csv, kept with the outcomes ledger) and a brief and a first message per top pick (creators/<D>/briefs/<handle>.md) — claims-safe, disclosure-ready, for the marketer to send: references/creator-brief.md, references/first-message.md, references/wave-criteria.md.

Before you start

  1. Setup first: do the marketing-guide skill §1–2 (connect, brand, brain read) before anything else; the job line is "I find and check creators through it." (get_started with wants: "more"; when it asks which brand, ask in one line and call it again.) Then, for this playbook:
    • Brain path: the chapters the map points to for products, audience and rivals, plus 14 (rules — every [creators …] one), 22 and 23; gooseworks:brand_knowledge_search for creators in talks, past deals and rates, the persona.
    • Fallback path: gooseworks:brand_read (summary, kit, products with prices, competitors, organic — the brand's and rivals' recent posts, where collabs show — accounts, learnings) and gooseworks:knowledge_search for the same.
  2. Read the roster and siblings — free. gooseworks:social_inspiration_library / gooseworks:social_inspiration_search; gooseworks:campaign_read if a campaign has a creator leg; workspace: creators/roster.csv, the newest report and lessons/*.md, research/audience/buyer-groups.md, research/competitors/ records. Run the outcomes-ledger skill (entity: creator) for declines, never-agains and stale picks — its updates question waits for step 7. Then since last time: the Start steps of the run-memory skill (references/run-memory.md, job creator programme, subject wave-<n> — the wave this run plans or reads): wave results by role and tier from the roster, last run's picks and price bands checked against what came back — 3–5 lines that open the report and steer this run. Claims: only the read step of the claims-gate skill now.
  3. Ask nothing before the report. The only question allowed first: "UGC" or "content for ads" with no word on who films → "A real person filming, or AI-made?" (AI-made video goes to the goose-video skill: offer it as the next job; real people filming stay here). Everything else — goal, budget, platforms — is assumed from the brand and the ask, stated in the report, and corrected in step 7.

Steps

  1. Frame. From the brand, its product pages (host browser: price, what it is, who it's for) and the ask: the product, the likely goal (DTC: reach + content for ads; app: installs + UGC; B2B: pipeline), platforms, roles and what "gift" means (references/creators-by-company-type.md). Each assumption is labelled. No budget → plan three wave sizes (pricing §7).

  2. Free pass — discovery. the work-with-creators-creator-discovery skill with references/discovery.md: the brand's and rivals' recent posts and collabs (free in the brain); rivals' partnership ads in the Meta Ad Library in the browser; web search ("<category> creator tiktok", "best <concern> creators", roundups, "#ad <rival>"); TikTok, Instagram and YouTube search and hashtag pages and public profiles in the host browser, read as a person would; creators already tagging or mentioning the brand (sentiment read); saved Inspiration outliers. B2B: read X and LinkedIn in the host browser first (posts, who comments, headlines) — that's where these buyers are; YouTube alone is not enough. If X or LinkedIn can't be read, say so and label the top pick "weak — not read where the buyer is". Long list → screen → 10–25 finalists.

  3. Free pass — public vetting. the work-with-creators-creator-vetting skill with references/vetting.md, from each finalist's public page: followers, views on the last 12 posts where the platform shows them (median, not mean), sponsored vs organic posts (#ad, partnership labels), cadence, a read of the visible comments on 2–3 posts, competitor deals, safety in captions and a name search, regulated-claim and minors checks. Every number dated and linked, labelled "public-page read". Where a page hides a number, say so — that is what the paid top-up deepens.

  4. Price and deal. the work-with-creators-rate-and-deal skill with references/pricing-and-deals.md: a rough floor / target from the public median × dated bands, rights priced separately, a walk-away from the goal (labelled "rough" until the marketer confirms budget and unit cost), gift / paid / affiliate / hybrid per pick with the reason.

  5. Synthesize. The mix and wave 1 with its criteria (references/wave-criteria.md); For you per pick — the format that fits our product and why, what they'd make (format, hook, which product), the signed-off claim behind it or "you'd need proof of X first", who makes it (the creator, briefed); You vs them — who rivals pay, in what formats, what we already have (our own creator posts and tags); don't follow the herd: if every rival uses the same kind of creator, weigh what buyers say over what rivals do. Then the work-with-creators-brief-writer skill: a brief and a first message for the top 3–5 picks now (claims lines awaiting sign-off marked so), the rest after names are approved.

  6. Write and deliver through the write-report skill, as gooseworks-reports/<brand-slug>/<D>-creators.md; the roster, near-misses and briefs under creators/ (paths below). Then run-memory's End steps (references/run-memory.md): the run record with the counts, wave 1 (or the renew / cut calls) as recommendations with their wave criteria as the test — no creator names or handles.

  7. One message: the draft and the decisions. Three lines — the best pick and why, the first move, the link. Then only what changes the answer: the budget (it changes the mix; the report shows three sizes); gift unit cost if the plan gifts; names to strike; the claims lines the briefs need (claims-gate scoped sign-off); a paid top-up to vet deeper — say what it adds (full post history and views where pages hide them, comment reads at volume, transcripts for claims and safety, audience countries for the top picks, public business contacts for approved names), the estimate, and one yes to "up to N credits" (the spend-gate skill branch B, the probe inside it); roster updates since last time (asked once, never required); a repeat only if it would help this brand (step 9).

  8. On their answers. Re-price on the real budget and unit cost, run the top-up inside its ceiling (log every charge), finish briefs and first messages for the approved names, re-deliver the report. Wave results come back through the outcomes ledger (and, once a wave's read window is over, the next run — same job creator programme, same wave-<n> subject — judges each recommendation by its id against its criterion); a rule the marketer states goes through the save-learning skill as [creators YYYY-MM-DD].

  9. Offer a repeat only when it helps (marketing-guide §3, "Schedules"). Judge it: a monthly roster refresh helps when a creator programme is running or about to (waves going out, rates being quoted, a seeding list to keep filling) — say why ("your wave 1 posts this month; a monthly refresh re-vets the picks and adds new creators in your niche"). A one-off shortlist, a single brief or a one-time vet of one creator: no offer. When offered and accepted: created paused, per spend-gate §C, each run's report opening with what changed.

Approval gates

  • The free pass needs no yes. A paid top-up needs one yes to a ceiling; it stops there.
  • Boundary: the marketer decides who represents the brand (names approved, all or strike any) and sends every message. Every price and deal is a recommendation — nothing is agreed, shipped, paid or messaged by this playbook.

Output and write-back

ArtifactWhere (save mode)Read by
Reportcreators/<D>/report.md → Creator report — <Brand> — <D> (keep-history)the marketer, the next run
Rostercreators/roster.csv (outcomes-ledger schema)every later run, analyze-performance (roster seeding), plan-campaign (creator leg)
Roster summarycreators/roster-summary.md → Creator roster — <Brand> — <D> (supersede; no contact details)later runs, plan-campaign
Briefs + first messages, wave 1, near-missescreators/<D>/briefs/<handle>.md, wave-1.md, near-misses.csvthe marketer
Lessonscreators/lessons/<D>.md → Creator lessons — <Brand> — <D> (keep-history, via outcomes-ledger)later runs
Run recordsruns/work-with-creators/creator-programme/wave-<n>/<D>.md → Run record — creator programme — wave-<n> — <Brand> — <D> (keep-history, via run-memory; counts and links only, no creator names or handles)the next run
Paid chargesresearch/credits-log/<YYYY-MM>.md (spend-gate)every playbook's estimates

Creator posts are not saved to the Inspiration library (no usage rights yet).

Done when

"Since last time" opened the report (or "no earlier run"), and the run record was saved with counts and links only. The report arrived with no question asked before it beyond Before you start #3, passing write-report §3, naming real creators with dated, linked public numbers — never follower counts alone — a price range with the math per pick, For you per pick, You vs them, wave-1 criteria, briefs and first messages for the top picks, and what could not be read. Nobody was contacted.

Out of scope

Sending messages, negotiation, contracts, gifting, codes, payouts — the marketer (backlog: the ops half) · measuring results across channels — analyze-performance · approving finished creator content — the marketer · AI-made UGC-style video — the goose-video skill · turning creator content into ads once rights are contracted — image ads with make-static-ads, launched by run-paid-campaigns; video ads from creator footage — the goose-video skill · UGC marketplaces, affiliate programmes, celebrity deals, podcast guesting, communities, events — not covered · legal advice.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

<slug>

無料概要あり

資料には具体的なスキルの内容や手順が記載されていないため、用途や得られる結果を特定できません。

  • 用途を確認したいとき
  • 入力や手順を確認したいとき
  • 期待する結果を確認したいとき
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2722026年10月27日 更新

ad-angle-miner

無料概要あり

顧客の課題や商品情報、広告事例を調べ、根拠のある広告訴求と静止画・動画・コピー案にまとめます。動画案は実際の制作フォーマットとの相性も確認し、商品単位の角度集として整理します。

  • 商品の根拠に沿った広告の切り口を探したいとき
  • 静止画広告や動画広告の案を作りたいとき
  • 顧客の言葉から見出しや広告文を考えたいとき
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2722026年10月27日 更新

ad-campaign-analyzer

無料概要あり

Google、Meta、LinkedInなどの広告実績を分析し、成果の出た広告や予算の無駄を特定します。停止・拡大・テスト案や、具体的な予算配分を提案します。

  • 広告予算の無駄を見つけたいとき
  • 複数媒体の成果を比較したいとき
  • 広告の停止・拡大候補を決めたいとき
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2722026年10月27日 更新

ad-lead-quality-analyzer

無料概要あり

広告費と登録後の成果を照合し、質の高いリード獲得にかかった実コストを算出します。広告素材ごとに拡大・維持・調査・停止の判断材料を整理するスキルです。

  • 広告素材ごとの実質獲得コストを比べたいとき
  • 低CPAでも質の低い広告を見つけたいとき
  • 登録後の成果データとの照合状況を調べたいとき
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2722026年10月27日 更新

ad-management-intake

無料概要あり

Meta広告を始める前にブランド情報を調べ、予算や広告表現に関わる不明点だけを質問して準備を整えます。確認事項と仮定を記録し、ブランド情報とキャンペーン概要を作成します。

  • ブランド情報が未記録の状態で広告を始めたいとき
  • 予算や広告期間の前提を整理したいとき
  • 広告で使う主張や制約を記録したいとき
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2722026年10月27日 更新

ad-policy-check

無料概要あり

広告文や画像内の表現を配信先と商品カテゴリのルールに照らして確認し、直せる箇所を修正しながら、法務や人の判断が必要なリスクを広告ごとに整理します。

  • 広告の配信前チェック
  • 広告画像や動画の表現確認
  • クリエイター広告の表示確認
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2722026年10月27日 更新

gooseworks-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する