本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

commission-intelligence

Explain sales commission calculations, resolve discrepancies, and model compensation scenarios for quota planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsスター 150(GitHub 150 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Commission Intelligence

Demystify sales compensation by explaining commission calculations, identifying discrepancies, and modeling payout scenarios.

When to Use This Skill

  • Reps questioning commission statements
  • Designing or updating comp plans
  • Modeling quota and OTE scenarios
  • Resolving payout disputes
  • Planning territory changes

Methodology Foundation

Based on Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design and WorldatWork Incentive Compensation principles, covering:

  • Base + variable structures
  • Quota attainment mechanics
  • Accelerators and decelerators
  • Split and overlay rules

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Explains calculation logicFinal payout approvals
Identifies discrepanciesException handling
Models scenariosPlan design choices
Documents rules clearlyPolicy changes
Calculates examplesQuota assignments

What This Skill Does

  1. Calculation explanation - Break down how commission was computed
  2. Discrepancy identification - Find calculation errors or data issues
  3. Scenario modeling - Project earnings under different assumptions
  4. Plan documentation - Clarify complex comp plan rules
  5. Dispute resolution - Provide clear audit trail

How to Use

Explain this commission calculation:

Rep: [Name]
Role: [AE, SDR, etc.]
Quota: $[Amount]/[Period]
Closed this period: $[Amount]

Comp plan rules:
- Base: $X
- OTE: $X
- Variable: X% of base
- Commission rate: X% up to quota
- Accelerator: X% above quota

Deals closed:
- [List deals with amounts and close dates]

Statement shows: $[Commission Amount]
Rep expected: $[Expected Amount]

Instructions

Step 1: Understand the Comp Plan Structure

Common Structures:

TypeDescription
Revenue Commission% of deal value
Quota-Based% payout based on attainment
TieredDifferent rates at different levels
DrawAdvance against future commissions
MBOBonus for specific objectives

Step 2: Calculate Attainment

Attainment % = (Closed Revenue / Quota) × 100

Example:
- Quota: $500,000
- Closed: $450,000
- Attainment: 90%

Step 3: Apply Commission Rules

Standard Calculation:

Base Commission = Closed Revenue × Commission Rate

With Quota Thresholds:
- Below 50% attainment: 0% payout (common)
- 50-100% attainment: Linear payout
- Above 100%: Accelerator rate kicks in

Accelerator Example:

Plan: 10% up to quota, 15% above quota
Quota: $500K, Closed: $600K

Commission:
- First $500K × 10% = $50,000
- Next $100K × 15% = $15,000
- Total: $65,000

Step 4: Handle Special Cases

ScenarioRule
Split dealsDivide credit per agreement
Multi-yearRecognize per year or upfront
Churn/ClawbackDeduct if customer cancels
Ramped quotaReduced quota for new hires
SPIFsOne-time bonus amounts

Step 5: Reconcile Discrepancies

Common Issues:

IssueCauseResolution
Missing dealNot in CRMAdd deal, recalculate
Wrong amountIncorrect ACVVerify contract value
Wrong rateTier confusionCheck attainment level
Split errorCredit allocationReview split agreement
TimingRevenue recognitionCheck close date vs. pay period

Examples

Example 1: Commission Explanation

Input:

Explain why Sarah's commission is $12,500:

Rep: Sarah (AE)
Quota: $200,000/quarter
Q4 Closed: $175,000

Comp plan:
- OTE: $200,000 (50/50 split)
- Variable: $100,000/year = $25,000/quarter
- At 100% attainment: Full $25K variable
- Linear payout from 50-100%
- Accelerator: 1.5x above 100%

Deals:
- Acme Corp: $80,000 (Oct 15)
- Beta Inc: $45,000 (Nov 3)
- Gamma LLC: $50,000 (Dec 20)
Total: $175,000

Output:

## Commission Breakdown: Sarah - Q4

### Step 1: Verify Closed Revenue
| Deal | Amount | Close Date | ✓ |
|------|--------|------------|---|
| Acme Corp | $80,000 | Oct 15 | ✓ Q4 |
| Beta Inc | $45,000 | Nov 3 | ✓ Q4 |
| Gamma LLC | $50,000 | Dec 20 | ✓ Q4 |
| **Total** | **$175,000** | | ✓ |

### Step 2: Calculate Attainment

Attainment = $175,000 / $200,000 = 87.5%


### Step 3: Apply Commission Formula

**Plan Rules:**
- 50% threshold: Below 50% = $0
- 50-100%: Linear from $0 to $25,000
- 100%+: 1.5x accelerator

**Calculation:**

Sarah is at 87.5% (between 50% and 100%)

Linear formula: Payout = (Attainment - 50%) / 50% × Full Variable Payout = (87.5% - 50%) / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 37.5% / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 75% × $25,000 Payout = $18,750


### ⚠️ Discrepancy Found!

**Statement shows**: $12,500
**Calculated**: $18,750
**Difference**: $6,250 underpaid

### Likely Cause

If system shows $12,500, it may be calculating:

$12,500 / $25,000 = 50% payout


This would happen if:
1. One deal not credited (Beta Inc $45K?)
2. Wrong formula (% of revenue vs % of variable)
3. Deal attributed to different quarter

### Recommended Action
1. Verify all 3 deals in commission system
2. Check if Beta Inc close date is in Q4
3. Confirm formula is linear 50-100%, not flat rate
4. Escalate to compensation admin with this breakdown

Example 2: Scenario Modeling

Input:

Model commission scenarios for Mike:

Current:
- Quota: $400,000/quarter
- OTE: $240,000 (60/40 split)
- Variable: $96,000/year = $24,000/quarter
- Rate: 6% of revenue up to quota
- Accelerator: 9% above quota

Q1 pipeline:
- Committed: $320,000
- Best case: $450,000
- Upside: $600,000

What would Mike earn in each scenario?

Output:

## Commission Scenarios: Mike - Q1

### Plan Summary
- Quota: $400,000
- At-quota commission: $24,000 (6% × $400K)
- Accelerator: 9% above quota

### Scenario Analysis

#### Scenario 1: Commit Only ($320K)

Attainment: 80% Revenue: $320,000

Commission at 6%: $320,000 × 6% = $19,200

Quarterly Variable: $19,200 Annualized: $76,800 vs OTE Variable ($96K): -$19,200

**Status**: Below quota, standard rate applies

---

#### Scenario 2: Best Case ($450K)

Attainment: 112.5% Revenue: $450,000

Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $50,000 × 9% = $4,500

Total Commission: $28,500

Quarterly Variable: $28,500 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$4,500 (19% bonus)

**Status**: Accelerator kicks in, strong quarter

---

#### Scenario 3: Upside ($600K)

Attainment: 150% Revenue: $600,000

Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $200,000 × 9% = $18,000

Total Commission: $42,000

Quarterly Variable: $42,000 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$18,000 (75% bonus)

**Status**: Excellent quarter, maximizing accelerator

---

### Summary Table

| Scenario | Revenue | Attainment | Commission | vs Plan |
|----------|---------|------------|------------|---------|
| Commit | $320K | 80% | $19,200 | -$4,800 |
| Best Case | $450K | 112% | $28,500 | +$4,500 |
| Upside | $600K | 150% | $42,000 | +$18,000 |

### Key Insights

1. **Break-even point**: $400K (100% attainment)
2. **Accelerator value**: Each $10K above quota = $900 extra
3. **Commit gap**: Need $80K more to hit quota
4. **Upside potential**: 75% more commission if pipeline converts

### Recommendations for Mike
1. Focus on moving $80K from Best Case to Commit
2. Push for upside deals - 9% rate is lucrative
3. Prioritize larger deals for accelerator impact

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Explaining commission math step-by-step
  • Identifying calculation discrepancies
  • Modeling what-if scenarios
  • Documenting plan rules clearly

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Access actual payout systems
  • Make policy exceptions
  • Override approved calculations
  • Handle edge cases without rules

When to Escalate to Human

  • Policy exceptions or special approvals
  • Historical adjustments requiring audit
  • Plan design decisions
  • Legal or HR compensation issues

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "What if Mike closes an extra $50K deal?"
  • "Show me the break-even point to hit OTE."
  • "Compare this plan to a flat 8% rate."
  • "Model the impact of increasing Mike's quota by 20%."

Refinement Cycle

  1. Document plan rules clearly
  2. Run sample calculations
  3. Verify against actual statements
  4. Build exception handling guide
  5. Create rep-facing FAQ

Checklists & Templates

Commission Dispute Resolution Checklist

  • Verify all deals in calculation
  • Confirm close dates in pay period
  • Check split/overlay credits
  • Validate attainment tier
  • Review for clawbacks/adjustments
  • Compare to plan document

Comp Plan Documentation Template

## [Role] Compensation Plan - [Year]

### Structure
- Base Salary: $X
- OTE: $X
- Variable: $X (X% of OTE)
- Pay Period: [Monthly/Quarterly]

### Commission Mechanics
- Quota: $X/[period]
- Base Rate: X%
- Accelerator: X% above quota
- Threshold: X% minimum attainment

### Special Rules
- Splits: [Policy]
- Clawbacks: [Policy]
- Ramping: [New hire policy]

### Examples
[Include 3 scenarios at 80%, 100%, 120%]

References

  • Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design
  • WorldatWork Incentive Compensation Handbook
  • Salesforce Sales Cloud Commission Documentation
  • Xactly Commission Best Practices

Related Skills

  • pipeline-forecasting - Project commission from forecast
  • deal-risk-scoring - Prioritize high-commission deals
  • quota-planning - Set achievable targets

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Advanced
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 15-30 min per analysis
  • Prerequisites: Comp plan document, deal data

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Measure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Calculate A/B test statistical significance. Use when: determining if test results are significant; calculating required sample size; estimating test duration; analyzing conversion experiments; making data-driven decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Assess customer account health using product usage, support sentiment, payment status, and relationship signals

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Analyze paid advertising performance across channels and recommend budget reallocation to maximize ROAS and minimize CAC. Use when: planning quarterly ad budget allocation, diagnosing underperforming ad channels, deciding whether to scale spend on a channel, calculating marginal ROI across Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or TikTok, rebalancing media mix after performance shifts, or setting up a test-and-scale framework for new channels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Use when testing skills, commands, or agents for quality. Use after creating new skills, before deploying agents, or when debugging inconsistent agent behavior. Triggers on "evaluate", "test quality", "is this skill working", or QA of AI workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Use when analyzing server logs to understand how AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) interact with your site. Use when optimizing content placement for LLM retrieval, diagnosing why AI search isn't citing your content, or auditing crawl patterns to find optimization gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

guia-matthieu のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する