Measure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and apply lead scoring models combining firmographic fit, behavioral signals, and intent data for sales prioritization
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Prioritize leads using a systematic scoring model that combines ICP fit, engagement behavior, and buying intent signals.
Based on HubSpot's Lead Scoring methodology and Forrester's B2B Buyer Journey research, combining:
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Designs scoring model structure | Point values for your business |
| Calculates lead scores | MQL threshold for handoff |
| Identifies high-intent behaviors | Which behaviors matter most |
| Segments leads by score | Sales follow-up priorities |
| Suggests model improvements | Model weight adjustments |
Help me create a lead scoring model for [Business Type].
Our ICP:
- Company size: [Range]
- Industries: [List]
- Titles: [Target titles]
- Geography: [Regions]
Key buying signals we track:
- [List website pages, content, actions]
Current conversion rates:
- Lead to MQL: X%
- MQL to SQL: X%
- SQL to Won: X%
Score this lead:
Company: [Name]
Size: [Employees]
Industry: [Industry]
Title: [Contact title]
Location: [Geography]
Behavior (last 30 days):
- [List pages visited, content downloaded, emails opened]
Company Firmographics:
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Company size matches ICP | +10 |
| Industry in target list | +10 |
| Geography in target regions | +5 |
| Revenue in target range | +5 |
| Company size too small | -10 |
| Industry excluded | -20 |
Contact Demographics:
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Title is decision maker | +10 |
| Title is influencer | +5 |
| Title is end user | +3 |
| Student/Personal email | -15 |
| Competitor domain | -40 |
Content Engagement:
| Action | Points |
|---|---|
| Pricing page visit | +15 |
| Case study download | +10 |
| Product demo video watched | +10 |
| Blog post read | +2 |
| 5+ pages in session | +5 |
| Return visit within 7 days | +5 |
Direct Engagement:
| Action | Points |
|---|---|
| Demo request form | +30 |
| Contact sales form | +25 |
| Free trial signup | +20 |
| Webinar registration | +10 |
| Newsletter signup | +3 |
| Email opened | +1 |
| Email clicked | +3 |
Third-Party Intent:
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| Researching your category (Bombora/G2) | +15 |
| Competitor comparison searches | +10 |
| Job posting for related role | +5 |
| Funding announcement | +5 |
| Technology install matches | +5 |
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| Unsubscribed from email | -10 |
| Bounced email | -20 |
| No engagement 90+ days | -15 |
| Marked as spam | -30 |
| Competitor | -100 |
| Score Range | Qualification | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | Hot MQL | Immediate sales call |
| 60-79 | Warm MQL | SDR outreach 24hr |
| 40-59 | Marketing Qualified | Nurture sequence |
| 20-39 | Early Stage | Educational content |
| 0-19 | Not Qualified | Monitor only |
| Negative | Disqualified | Suppress |
Input:
Help me create a lead scoring model for B2B SaaS (marketing automation).
Our ICP:
- Company size: 50-500 employees
- Industries: Tech, E-commerce, SaaS
- Titles: VP Marketing, Director Marketing, CMO
- Geography: US, Canada, UK
Key buying signals:
- Pricing page, demo request, case studies
- Marketing automation category on G2
Output:
## Lead Scoring Model: Marketing Automation SaaS
### Fit Score (Max 40 points)
**Company Fit (20 points)**
| Criteria | Points |
|----------|--------|
| 50-500 employees | +10 |
| 500-1000 employees | +5 |
| <50 or >1000 employees | +0 |
| Tech/E-commerce/SaaS industry | +10 |
| Adjacent industry (Retail, Media) | +5 |
| Non-target industry | +0 |
**Contact Fit (20 points)**
| Criteria | Points |
|----------|--------|
| VP/Director Marketing, CMO | +15 |
| Marketing Manager | +10 |
| Marketing Coordinator | +5 |
| Non-marketing title | +0 |
| US/Canada/UK | +5 |
| Other geography | +0 |
| Personal email (@gmail) | -15 |
| Competitor domain | -40 |
### Behavior Score (Max 40 points)
**High-Intent Actions**
| Action | Points |
|--------|--------|
| Demo request submitted | +25 |
| Pricing page visit | +15 |
| Case study download | +10 |
| Product tour completed | +10 |
**Engagement Actions**
| Action | Points |
|--------|--------|
| 3+ pages in session | +5 |
| Return visit (7 days) | +5 |
| Webinar registered | +8 |
| Blog post read | +2 |
| Email clicked | +3 |
| Email opened | +1 |
### Intent Score (Max 20 points)
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
| G2 category research | +10 |
| Competitor comparison | +8 |
| Marketing hire posting | +5 |
| Series A/B funding | +5 |
### Negative Scoring
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
| Unsubscribed | -10 |
| No activity 90 days | -15 |
| Email bounced | -20 |
| Competitor | -100 |
### Thresholds
| Score | Status | SLA |
|-------|--------|-----|
| 70+ | 🔥 Hot MQL | Call within 5 min |
| 50-69 | 🟢 MQL | SDR contact 24hr |
| 30-49 | 🟡 Nurture | Email sequence |
| <30 | Monitor | No outreach |
Input:
Score this lead using the model above:
Company: GrowthTech Inc
Size: 180 employees
Industry: SaaS
Title: VP of Marketing
Location: San Francisco, US
Behavior (last 30 days):
- Visited pricing page (2x)
- Downloaded "Email Automation Guide"
- Attended webinar "Marketing Automation 101"
- Opened 4 emails, clicked 2
- Visited 8 pages total
Intent: Showing on G2 for marketing automation research
Output:
## Lead Score: GrowthTech Inc
### Overall Score: 83/100 🔥 HOT MQL
### Score Breakdown
**Fit Score: 35/40**
| Factor | Points | Notes |
|--------|--------|-------|
| Company size (180) | +10 | Perfect ICP |
| Industry (SaaS) | +10 | Target industry |
| Title (VP Marketing) | +15 | Decision maker |
| Location (US) | +5 | Target geography |
| **Subtotal** | **35** | |
**Behavior Score: 38/40**
| Action | Points | Notes |
|--------|--------|-------|
| Pricing page (2x) | +15 | High intent signal |
| Content download | +5 | Educational engagement |
| Webinar attended | +8 | Active learning |
| 8 pages visited | +5 | Deep exploration |
| 4 emails opened | +4 | Engaged with nurture |
| 2 emails clicked | +6 | Taking action |
| **Subtotal** | **38** | |
**Intent Score: 10/20**
| Signal | Points | Notes |
|--------|--------|-------|
| G2 category research | +10 | Active buyer research |
| **Subtotal** | **10** | |
### Qualification: HOT MQL
- **Action Required**: Immediate SDR call (within 5 minutes)
- **Talking Points**: Reference webinar attendance, pricing interest
- **Ask**: "What prompted your marketing automation research?"
### Next Best Actions
1. Call within 5 minutes (hot lead SLA)
2. Reference webinar + pricing page visits
3. Offer personalized demo with VP Marketing use cases
4. Connect on LinkedIn (warm outreach)
## [Company] Lead Scoring Model v[X]
### Fit Score (Max X points)
| Criteria | Points |
|----------|--------|
### Behavior Score (Max X points)
| Action | Points |
|--------|--------|
### Intent Score (Max X points)
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
### Negative Scoring
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
### Thresholds
| Score | Status | Action |
|-------|--------|--------|
### Review Schedule
- Quarterly weight review
- Monthly threshold check
icp-matching - Deep ICP definitionpipeline-forecasting - Score aggregation to forecastdeal-risk-scoring - Post-MQL deal healthまだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Measure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculate A/B test statistical significance. Use when: determining if test results are significant; calculating required sample size; estimating test duration; analyzing conversion experiments; making data-driven decisions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess customer account health using product usage, support sentiment, payment status, and relationship signals
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze paid advertising performance across channels and recommend budget reallocation to maximize ROAS and minimize CAC. Use when: planning quarterly ad budget allocation, diagnosing underperforming ad channels, deciding whether to scale spend on a channel, calculating marginal ROI across Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or TikTok, rebalancing media mix after performance shifts, or setting up a test-and-scale framework for new channels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when testing skills, commands, or agents for quality. Use after creating new skills, before deploying agents, or when debugging inconsistent agent behavior. Triggers on "evaluate", "test quality", "is this skill working", or QA of AI workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when analyzing server logs to understand how AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) interact with your site. Use when optimizing content placement for LLM retrieval, diagnosing why AI search isn't citing your content, or auditing crawl patterns to find optimization gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。