本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

sandler-system

Apply Sandler Selling System principles for consultative sales with pain discovery, budget qualification, and mutual decision frameworks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsスター 150(GitHub 150 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md13.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Sandler Selling System

Apply Sandler's consultative selling methodology focusing on pain discovery, upfront contracts, and mutual commitment to transform sales conversations.

When to Use This Skill

  • Discovery conversations
  • Handling sales resistance
  • Budget qualification
  • Creating mutual commitments
  • Dealing with objections

Methodology Foundation

Based on David Sandler's Selling System, built on:

  • Pain discovery (not feature selling)
  • Upfront contracts (mutual agreements)
  • Budget qualification (money conversation early)
  • Decision framework (clear next steps)
  • Equal business stature (not subservient selling)

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Structures discovery questionsWhen to use techniques
Creates upfront contract templatesHow aggressive to be
Designs pain funnelingRelationship balance
Suggests budget qualificationDeal-specific judgment
Provides objection frameworksWalking away decisions

Instructions

Step 1: Understand the Sandler Submarine

Seven Stages:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  THE SANDLER SUBMARINE                                      │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  1. Bonding & Rapport ──► 2. Upfront Contract              │
│           │                        │                        │
│           └────────────────────────┘                        │
│                      │                                      │
│           3. Pain ◄──┘                                      │
│              │                                              │
│              ▼                                              │
│           4. Budget                                         │
│              │                                              │
│              ▼                                              │
│           5. Decision                                       │
│              │                                              │
│              ▼                                              │
│           6. Fulfillment (Present Solution)                 │
│              │                                              │
│              ▼                                              │
│           7. Post-Sell (Reinforce Decision)                │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Step 2: Master Pain Discovery

Pain Funnel Technique:

LevelQuestion TypeExample
SurfaceOpen"Tell me more about that"
DeeperClarifying"Can you be more specific?"
ImpactBusiness"How is that affecting the business?"
PersonalIndividual"How does that affect you personally?"
CommitmentAction"What have you tried to fix it?"

Step 3: Create Upfront Contracts

Upfront Contract Elements:

  1. Time - How long do we have?
  2. Agenda - What will we cover?
  3. Outcome - What's the possible result?
  4. Permission - Can we have honest conversation?

Step 4: Qualify Budget

Money Questions (Progressive):

TimingQuestion
Early"Is there a budget for this?"
Middle"What range are you thinking?"
Direct"If we could solve this, what's it worth?"
Test"Our solution is typically $X. Does that fit?"

Step 5: Establish Decision Process

Decision Questions:

  • "How do decisions like this typically get made?"
  • "Who else needs to be involved?"
  • "What could stop this from happening?"
  • "What's the timeline for a decision?"

Examples

Example 1: Discovery Call with Sandler Framework

Input:

Structure a discovery call using Sandler principles.
Context: First meeting with VP of Marketing, inbound lead.

Output:

## Sandler Discovery Call Structure

### Pre-Call Preparation

**Mindset:**
- You're interviewing them as much as they're interviewing you
- No need to convince—focus on uncovering fit
- Comfortable walking away if not right
- Equal business stature, not supplicant

---

### 1. Bonding & Rapport (5 minutes)

**Goal:** Establish equal footing, build trust

**Opening:**
"Thanks for making time, [Name]. Before we dive in, I have to admit—
I did some homework on [Company] and have some questions, but I'm
also curious about what prompted you to reach out in the first place."

**Techniques:**
- Match their energy and pace
- Find common ground (naturally)
- Demonstrate you've done research
- Be genuinely curious, not performative

---

### 2. Upfront Contract (3 minutes)

**Goal:** Mutual agreement on meeting structure

**Script:**
"[Name], to make sure we both get value from this conversation,
can I suggest how this might go?

We have about 30 minutes. I'd like to understand what's going on
in your world that made you want to talk. I'll share a bit about
what we do—but honestly, I'm not sure if we're the right fit yet.

At the end, one of three things will happen:
1. We both see enough potential to keep talking
2. You decide it's not right—and that's totally fine
3. I tell you we're not the right fit—and I promise I will

Does that work for you? And can we agree to be straight with
each other?"

**Why this works:**
- Sets expectation you might say no
- Gets permission for honest conversation
- Reduces buyer's defense mechanisms
- Establishes equal stature

---

### 3. Pain Discovery (15 minutes)

**Goal:** Uncover real pain, not surface problems

**Opening Question:**
"So, tell me—what's happening that made you want to have this
conversation now?"

**Pain Funnel in Action:**

| Their Response | Your Follow-Up |
|----------------|----------------|
| "We need better marketing automation" | "Tell me more about that" |
| "Our campaigns aren't performing" | "What does 'not performing' mean specifically?" |
| "Our open rates dropped 30%" | "How is that affecting the business?" |
| "We're missing revenue targets" | "By how much?" |
| "$2M behind this quarter" | "How does that affect you personally?" |
| "I'm on the hot seat with the CEO" | "What have you tried to fix this?" |

**Key Questions:**
1. "Tell me more about that"
2. "What do you mean by [vague term]?"
3. "How long has this been going on?"
4. "What's it costing the business?"
5. "How is this affecting you personally?"
6. "What have you tried already?"
7. "Why didn't that work?"
8. "What happens if you don't solve this?"

**Reverse Technique (when they ask about your solution early):**
> Them: "Can you just tell me how your platform works?"
> You: "I could, but honestly, I'm not sure if it's even relevant yet.
> Help me understand what you're actually trying to solve first."

---

### 4. Budget Qualification (5 minutes)

**Goal:** Understand if money is available and in what range

**Progressive Approach:**

**Level 1 (Soft):**
"If we could solve [pain you uncovered], would there be budget
for something like this?"

**Level 2 (Range):**
"When you've invested in solutions like this before, what kind
of investment was typical?"

**Level 3 (Direct):**
"I want to be respectful of your time. Solutions like ours
typically range from $X to $Y depending on scope. Does that
match what you were thinking, or are we in different universes?"

**If they resist:**
> "Look, I get it—budget conversations can be uncomfortable.
> But here's my concern: if I spend our time showing you
> something you can't afford, I've wasted both our time.
> What would be helpful here?"

---

### 5. Decision Process (3-5 minutes)

**Goal:** Map the buying process

**Questions:**
- "Walk me through how decisions like this typically get made at [Company]"
- "Who else would need to weigh in?"
- "Is there anyone who could stop this from happening?"
- "Have you bought anything like this before? How did that go?"
- "What's driving your timeline?"

**Red Flag Questions:**
- "What could make you decide NOT to move forward?"
- "What would make you go with a competitor instead of us?"

---

### 6. Upfront Contract for Next Step

**Goal:** Clear mutual commitment or clear no

**If positive indicators:**
"Based on what you've shared, I think there might be something
here. Here's what I'd suggest for next steps:

I'll put together [specific thing] that addresses [their pain].
We'd meet again with [whoever they mentioned], and at the end of
that meeting, you'll be in a position to tell me yes, no, or
'we need more information.'

Does that work? And can you commit to giving me a decision at
that meeting?"

**If unclear fit:**
"I appreciate your honesty. Based on what you've shared, I'm
not sure we're the best fit, and here's why: [reason].

What I'd suggest is [alternative or referral]. Does that help?"

---

### Sandler-isms to Remember

| Situation | Sandler Response |
|-----------|------------------|
| They want a proposal too fast | "I could send something over, but I'd just be guessing. Can we slow down?" |
| They won't discuss budget | "If we can't talk about money, how will we know if this makes sense?" |
| They ask for discount | "What is it about the value that you're questioning?" |
| They go silent after proposal | "Sounds like something's changed. Should I assume this is a no?" |
| They say "let me think about it" | "When people say that, it usually means no. Is that what's happening here?" |

Example 2: Handling "Let Me Think About It"

Input:

Prospect says "let me think about it" after a demo.
How do I respond using Sandler?

Output:

## Sandler Response: "Let Me Think About It"

### The Principle

In Sandler, "let me think about it" is often a polite no. Rather
than chase, you surface what's really going on.

---

### Response Script

**Option 1: Direct Reversal**
> "I appreciate that. When people tell me they need to think about
> it, usually it means something's not quite right. Can you help me
> understand—is this a no, or is there something specific you're
> trying to figure out?"

**Option 2: Permission to Be Honest**
> "[Name], I want to be straight with you. In my experience, 'let
> me think about it' often means 'no, but I don't want to say it.'
> I'd rather know now. Is this something you're genuinely considering,
> or are we done here?"

**Option 3: Negative Reverse**
> "Honestly, that sounds like a no. And that's okay—I'd rather
> know now than chase you for weeks. What's the real hesitation?"

---

### What Usually Happens

**Scenario 1: They admit it's a no**
- Thank them for honesty
- Ask what was missing
- Ask for referral or future timing
- Move on without burning bridge

**Scenario 2: They share real objection**
- Now you can actually address it
- Likely price, authority, timing, or feature gap
- Engage with real problem, not phantom

**Scenario 3: They commit to timeline**
- Great—make it an upfront contract
- "OK, so you need to think about [X]. Let's set a call for
  Thursday. At that point, you'll give me a yes or no. Fair?"

---

### What NOT to Do (Traditional Sales)

| Don't | Why It Fails |
|-------|--------------|
| "When can I follow up?" | Endless chase begins |
| "What questions do you have?" | They already said they're done |
| "Let me send more info" | They didn't ask for more info |
| "I'll check back next week" | You become a pest |

---

### The Sandler Mindset

You're not desperate for this deal. If it's not right, you'd
rather know now. This confidence paradoxically makes them more
likely to engage honestly—and often reveals they were just
testing to see if you'd chase.

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Structuring consultative conversations
  • Creating discovery frameworks
  • Handling objections non-defensively
  • Qualifying opportunities honestly

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Replace genuine curiosity
  • Work without relationship skills
  • Override poor product-market fit
  • Guarantee closed deals

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts:

  • "Create pain funnel questions for [industry]"
  • "How do I handle [specific objection]?"
  • "Design upfront contract for [scenario]"
  • "What if they won't discuss budget?"

References

  • David Sandler - Sandler Selling System
  • "You Can't Teach a Kid to Ride a Bike at a Seminar"
  • Sandler Rules - 49 Timeless Selling Principles
  • Sandler Training Institute

Related Skills

  • never-split-difference - Negotiation tactics
  • spin-selling - Question-based selling
  • challenger-sale - Teaching-based selling

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: Sales
  • Complexity: Intermediate-Advanced
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: Apply in next conversation
  • Prerequisites: Consultative selling context

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Measure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Calculate A/B test statistical significance. Use when: determining if test results are significant; calculating required sample size; estimating test duration; analyzing conversion experiments; making data-driven decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Assess customer account health using product usage, support sentiment, payment status, and relationship signals

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Analyze paid advertising performance across channels and recommend budget reallocation to maximize ROAS and minimize CAC. Use when: planning quarterly ad budget allocation, diagnosing underperforming ad channels, deciding whether to scale spend on a channel, calculating marginal ROI across Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or TikTok, rebalancing media mix after performance shifts, or setting up a test-and-scale framework for new channels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Use when testing skills, commands, or agents for quality. Use after creating new skills, before deploying agents, or when debugging inconsistent agent behavior. Triggers on "evaluate", "test quality", "is this skill working", or QA of AI workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

Use when analyzing server logs to understand how AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) interact with your site. Use when optimizing content placement for LLM retrieval, diagnosing why AI search isn't citing your content, or auditing crawl patterns to find optimization gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills1502026年10月1日 更新

guia-matthieu のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する