アイデアの整理、実装、不具合調査など、状況に合う関連スキルと使う順序を案内します。作業の規模や段階に応じて、次に進む手順を選ぶための相談役です。
- アイデアから実装までの手順選び
- 不具合調査の始め方を知りたいとき
- 複数回に分ける開発の進め方を相談
開発用スキルの初回利用に向けて、課題の管理先、仕分け用ラベル、用語集や設計判断の記録の配置を確認し、リポジトリ共通の設定文書を整えるスキル。
Configure this repo for the engineering skills: set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.
開発用スキルが参照する、リポジトリごとの共通設定を整えます。既存のファイルや構成を調べ、課題の管理先、課題を仕分けるラベル、用語集と ADR(設計判断を残す文書)の配置を記録します。設定は docs/agents/ にまとめ、既存の CLAUDE.md または AGENTS.md に参照先を追加します。
ほかの開発用スキルを初めて使う前に、作業の管理方法をそろえたい場合に向いています。GitHub、GitLab、ローカルの Markdown で課題を管理する場合に対応し、その他の管理先も利用者が説明した運用を記録します。
調査結果と設定案を利用者が確認してから書き込む対話型のスキルです。ラベルの設定は triage が導入済みの場合だけ行います。GitHub の操作には gh、GitLab には glab を使います。設定後は docs/agents/*.md を直接編集できます。
この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(Claude Haiku)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:
GLOSSARY.md and ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading themThis is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.
Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:
git remote -v and .git/config: is this a GitHub repo? Which one?AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md at the repo root: does either exist? Is there already an ## Agent skills section in either?GLOSSARY.md and GLOSSARY-MAP.md at the repo rootdocs/adr/ and any src/*/docs/adr/ directoriesdocs/agents/: does this skill's prior output already exist?.scratch/: a sign that a local-markdown issue tracker convention is already in usetriage skill installed? (a triage skill folder alongside this one, or triage in your available skills.) This decides whether Section B runs at all.pnpm-workspace.yaml, a workspaces field in package.json, or a populated packages/* with its own src/. These are present only in a genuinely large multi-package repo; their absence means single-context, which is almost every repo.Summarise what's present and what's missing. Then take the sections in order. One section, one answer, then the next.
Lead each section with the recommended answer so the user can accept it in a word. Give a one-line explainer only when the choice genuinely branches; skip the section entirely when exploration already settled it (Section B when triage isn't installed, Section C when there's no monorepo).
Section A: Issue tracker.
Explainer: The "issue tracker" is where issues live for this repo. Skills like
to-tickets,triage, andto-specread from and write to it. They need to know whether to callgh issue create, write a markdown file under.scratch/, or follow some other workflow you describe. Pick the place you actually track work for this repo.
Default posture: these skills were designed for GitHub. If a git remote points at GitHub, propose that. If a git remote points at GitLab (gitlab.com or a self-hosted host), propose GitLab. Otherwise (or if the user prefers), offer:
gh CLI)glab CLI).scratch/<feature>/ in this repo (good for solo projects or repos without a remote)Record the choice in docs/agents/issue-tracker.md. The GitHub and GitLab templates carry a "PRs as a request surface" flag, defaulted off. Leave it off and don't raise it: a user who wants external PRs in the triage queue can flip the flag in the file later.
Section B: Triage label vocabulary. Skip this section entirely if the triage skill isn't installed (exploration told you), since an uninstalled skill needs no labels.
If it is installed, ask exactly one question:
Do you want to keep the default triage labels? (recommended: yes)
The defaults are the five canonical roles, each label string equal to its name: needs-triage, needs-info, ready-for-agent, ready-for-human, wontfix. On yes, write them as-is. Only if the user says no, usually because their tracker already uses other names (e.g. bug:triage for needs-triage), collect the overrides so triage applies existing labels instead of creating duplicates.
Section C: Domain docs. Default to single-context (one GLOSSARY.md + docs/adr/ at the repo root). This fits almost every repo; write it without asking.
Offer multi-context (a root GLOSSARY-MAP.md pointing to per-context GLOSSARY.md files) only when exploration found monorepo signals. Then confirm which layout they want.
Show the user a draft of:
## Agent skills block to add to whichever of CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md is being edited (see step 4 for selection rules)docs/agents/issue-tracker.md, docs/agents/domain.md, and docs/agents/triage-labels.md (the last only when triage is installed)Let them edit before writing.
Pick the file to edit:
CLAUDE.md exists, edit it.AGENTS.md exists, edit it.Never create AGENTS.md when CLAUDE.md already exists (or vice versa); always edit the one that's already there.
If an ## Agent skills block already exists in the chosen file, update its contents in-place rather than appending a duplicate. Don't overwrite user edits to the surrounding sections.
The block:
## Agent skills
### Issue tracker
[one-line summary of where issues are tracked]. See `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`.
### Triage labels
[one-line summary of the label vocabulary]. See `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`.
### Domain docs
[one-line summary of layout: "single-context" or "multi-context"]. See `docs/agents/domain.md`.
Include the ### Triage labels sub-block, and write docs/agents/triage-labels.md, only when triage is installed and Section B ran. When it isn't, both are omitted.
When Section B ran on GitHub or GitLab, create each configured label the tracker lacks (gh label create / glab label create).
Then write the docs files using the seed templates in this skill folder as a starting point:
triage is installed)For "other" issue trackers, write docs/agents/issue-tracker.md from scratch using the user's description.
Tell the user the setup is complete and which engineering skills will now read from these files. Mention they can edit docs/agents/*.md directly later; re-running this skill is only necessary if they want to switch issue trackers or restart from scratch.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
アイデアの整理、実装、不具合調査など、状況に合う関連スキルと使う順序を案内します。作業の規模や段階に応じて、次に進む手順を選ぶための相談役です。
長期的な目標に向けて複数のサブエージェントの作業を調整し、利用者との対話を続けながら、次の仕事にも役立つ作業環境や規約の改善を進めるスキル。
進行中の会話を引き継ぎ用に要約し、新しいバックグラウンドエージェントへ渡します。次の作業方針や参照資料を整理して、現在の作業場所で続きを始めます。
指定したコミットやブランチなどを基準にコードの変更を確認し、開発規約への適合と仕様の実現を別々にレビューします。二つの観点の指摘を分けて報告するスキルです。
呼び出し側が覚える使い方を小さく保ち、複雑な処理を内部にまとめる設計を支援します。共通の用語と判断基準で、モジュールの使いやすさやテストのしやすさを検討するスキルです。
再現しにくい不具合や処理速度の悪化を、症状を判定するテストやスクリプトで調べます。原因候補の検証から修正、再発防止の確認まで進めるスキル。