Control deep thinking mode. Default enabled. For very simple tasks (simple reminders, greetings, quick queries), can temporarily disable to speed up response. Auto-restores to enabled after completion.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
613 个 · 按相关度排序
Control deep thinking mode. Default enabled. For very simple tasks (simple reminders, greetings, quick queries), can temporarily disable to speed up response. Auto-restores to enabled after completion.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Before committing to a plan or launch, assume it already failed and reason backward through concrete causes — convert failure paths into mitigations, gates, and stop checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When a real test is too rare, large, or irreversible, run a controlled counterfactual: isolate one variable, fix conditions, trace the mechanistic chain, and bound what the result implies.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When a request is vague, assumption-laden, or "obvious," ask the few load-bearing questions that expose hidden requirements before building or committing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Under genuine uncertainty with no reliable forecast, inventory means, cap downside at affordable loss, act for commitments, and let goals emerge from controllable moves.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Before heavy deliberation, classify the decision as cheap or costly to undo; decide two-way doors fast and stage one-way doors to preserve options.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when forecasting, estimating, or sizing risk — anchor on base rates, give ranges, update prior→likelihood→posterior on evidence, and factor unmeasured quantities into order-of-magnitude bounds.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
For authorized security review of code, auth, or APIs you control, model the attacker, map the attack surface, and report only findings with a reproducible exploit path and verified mitigation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use under time pressure when the situation is still changing and you must act before certainty — cycle Observe→Orient→Decide→Act on ~70% confidence, then re-observe.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Before committing scarce time, people, or money, name the best forgone use of those resources and the value delta of the chosen path versus that alternative.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when longevity of a non-perishable option matters. Treat survival duration as a remaining-life prior, then check domain drift before favoring the proven.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the reflex is to add a feature, layer, or process. Prefer removing harmful or nonessential elements first, with an irreversibility guard before deletion.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When a change has effects past the immediate fix—incentives, scale, feedback—trace consequence chains with timing and probability before committing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when search or investigation could run forever. Set an explicit good-enough threshold first, then stop at the first option that clears it.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When provisioning, setting a limit, or committing an estimate under uncertainty, size a buffer to residual error and the cost of breach—not to the optimistic edge.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When one mental model leaves a material blind spot on a multi-domain or high-stakes problem, sequence complementary models with named roles and a conflict rule.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When a claim, doc, test, metric, or assumption conflicts with observed behavior, stop theorizing from the map and verify the live code or data; let territory overrule.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When a symptom has several plausible causes, rank falsifiable hypotheses and run the cheapest discriminating observation first; prefer least-assumptive survivors only after evidence fit.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。