跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

thinking-cynefin

When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Cynefin Classification

Classify by cause-effect, then use only the matching response mode. Wrong-domain method is the failure mode.

When to Use

  • Unsure whether to run a playbook, analyze, probe, or stabilize.
  • A method keeps failing and domain mismatch is plausible.
  • A novel or mixed problem needs approach selection before solution work.

When NOT to Use

  • Domain and method are already agreed—execute.
  • Task is finding a specific cause, not choosing an approach.
  • Classification done; switch to the domain method—do not re-label endlessly.
  • Pure mechanical edits with no approach uncertainty.

Procedure

  1. State the unit. Name the decision, incident, or subsystem; if mixed, list separable parts.
  2. Probe cause-effect. Is the link obvious, expert-analyzable, retrospective only, or imperceptible in turbulence? Check predictability, urgency, and probe safety.
  3. Assign one domain per unit:
    • Clear — obvious → Sense → Categorize → Respond with a runbook.
    • Complicated — expert-analyzable → Sense → Analyze → Respond; several valid answers.
    • Complex — emergent → Probe → Sense → Respond with safe-to-fail probes; amplify/dampen signals.
    • Chaotic — no safe sensing time → Act → Sense → Respond; stabilize first.
    • Disorder — unknown → split and classify each part.
  4. Mismatch check. Reject Clear if its runbook fails; Complicated if analysis cannot predict; Complex if probing is unsafe; Chaotic once safe probing becomes possible.
  5. Commit and stop. Output domain + first actions. Re-classify only on evidence of domain shift.

Stop when every unit has one domain, first actions, and a falsifier—or disorder is decomposed.

Output

unit: <decision/incident/part>
domain: clear | complicated | complex | chaotic | disorder
evidence: <cause-effect basis>
response_mode: <Sense-Categorize-Respond | Sense-Analyze-Respond | Probe-Sense-Respond | Act-Sense-Respond | decompose>
first_actions: <1-3 concrete steps>
falsifier: <what forces reclassification>
parts: <only if disorder>

Verification

  • Falsify: Reliable prediction → not Complex. No safe probe → Chaotic. Working runbook → Clear.
  • Stop: Stop classifying once the matched action is clear.
  • Over-application guard: Do not call work Complex to avoid analysis or Complicated to avoid a standard fix. One label per unit; decompose multi-domain work.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when search or investigation could run forever. Set an explicit good-enough threshold first, then stop at the first option that clears it.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16642026年8月8日 更新

Use when a specific claim may lack grounding. Check evidence boundary, size wrongness cost, then answer, fetch, or abstain — never confabulate.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16642026年8月8日 更新

Under genuine uncertainty with no reliable forecast, inventory means, cap downside at affordable loss, act for commitments, and let goals emerge from controllable moves.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16642026年8月8日 更新

When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16642026年8月8日 更新

When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16642026年8月8日 更新

Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16642026年8月8日 更新

查看 tjboudreaux 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题