跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

thinking-first-principles

When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

First Principles

Strip assumed constraints to independently supported primitives, then rebuild. Escape analogy when convention fails or looks artificially expensive.

When to Use

  • A constraint is treated as fixed ("too expensive," "impossible," "always done this way") without independent support.
  • Convention or analogy has failed, stalled, or only yields weak incremental variants.
  • Greenfield design where industry defaults may smuggle false requirements.
  • Cost or feasibility claims rest on pricing, precedent, or authority rather than physics, math, or measured need.

When NOT to Use

  • The constraint is verified physics, hard regulation, or measured capacity → accept it and optimize within it.
  • A proven standard library, protocol, or known-good pattern already fits → use it; do not re-derive.
  • Time-critical incidents → act on the most likely cause first; reserve first-principles rebuild for post-incident redesign.
  • Incremental polish of a working system with no false-constraint signal → skip.

Procedure

  1. State the problem and claimed constraints. List every limit treated as fixed (cost, scale, stack, process, "must use X").
  2. Classify each constraint. Tag as physics/math, regulation/contract, measured fact, or convention/analogy/authority. Keep only the first three as binding unless evidence upgrades a convention.
  3. Decompose to primitives. Required inputs, conservation/complexity bounds, true non-negotiables. Demand independent support (measurement, derivation, primary requirement)—not vendor pricing or competitor precedent.
  4. Discard unsupported assumptions. For each convention tag, state a falsifier. Drop or renegotiate anything lacking support.
  5. Rebuild from remaining primitives only. Simplest solution that satisfies binding constraints and ignores artificial ones. Prefer commodity inputs and fewer moving parts over analogy.
  6. Validate and stop. Check against real physics, contracts, and measured needs. Define the cheapest kill test. Stop when a coherent rebuild plus discriminating validation exists, or when only verified hard constraints remain.

Output

Emit a first-principles rebuild:

  • claimed_constraints: list with classification tags
  • primitives: independently supported truths only
  • discarded_assumptions: conventions dropped and why
  • rebuild: solution derived only from primitives
  • binding_residuals: real limits that remain
  • kill_test: cheapest check that would falsify the rebuild

Verification

  • Independence check: every primitive must cite measurement, derivation, or primary requirement—not precedent alone.
  • No smuggled analogy: if the rebuild still depends on "how others do it" without a primitive, strip it.
  • Constraint honesty: verified physics/regulation must remain; do not wish them away.
  • Over-application guard: if a standard solution is already optimal under verified constraints, do not rebuild for novelty.
  • Stop: one decompose → classify → rebuild → kill-test pass; do not recurse without new evidence.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when search or investigation could run forever. Set an explicit good-enough threshold first, then stop at the first option that clears it.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16622026年8月8日 更新

Use when a specific claim may lack grounding. Check evidence boundary, size wrongness cost, then answer, fetch, or abstain — never confabulate.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16622026年8月8日 更新

When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16622026年8月8日 更新

Under genuine uncertainty with no reliable forecast, inventory means, cap downside at affordable loss, act for commitments, and let goals emerge from controllable moves.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16622026年8月8日 更新

When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16622026年8月8日 更新

Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills16622026年8月8日 更新

查看 tjboudreaux 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题