跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

customer-win-back-sequencer

For churned accounts, research what has changed since they left — new funding, team growth, competitor dissatisfaction, product updates that address their pain — then assess re-engagement potential and generate a personalized win-back email sequence with timing recommendations. Chains web research and LinkedIn monitoring with email sequence generation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具LinkedIn
查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md11.0 KB
  • skill.meta.json366 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Customer Win-Back Sequencer

Not every churned customer is gone forever. This skill identifies which ones to pursue, finds the right re-engagement angle, and generates a personalized win-back sequence. Timing and relevance are everything — no generic "we miss you" emails.

Built for: Startups that have churned customers sitting in a spreadsheet with no plan to re-engage them. The best win-back campaigns are triggered by change — this skill monitors for those changes and strikes when the timing is right.

When to Use

  • "Which churned customers should we try to win back?"
  • "Build a win-back campaign for [customer]"
  • "Research our churned accounts for re-engagement opportunities"
  • "Generate win-back emails for customers who left because of [reason]"
  • "Run the win-back scan on our churn list"

Phase 0: Intake

Churned Account Data

  1. Churn list — CSV/sheet with: company name, domain, contact email, contact LinkedIn URL (if available), churn date, MRR at churn, churn reason (if known)
  2. Time since churn filter — Min/max months since churn to consider (default: 3-18 months. Too recent = too soon. Too old = too stale.)
  3. Minimum value — Only pursue accounts above $X MRR? (Focus effort on worthwhile wins)

Product Context

  1. Major product updates since churn — What's new? (Features, pricing changes, integrations, performance improvements)
  2. Churn reasons addressed — Which past churn reasons have you actually fixed?
  3. Current offer — Any win-back incentive? (Discount, extended trial, concierge onboarding, free migration)

Sequence Preferences

  1. Sender — Who should the emails come from? (Founder, CSM, account exec)
  2. Channel — Email only, or email + LinkedIn?
  3. Sequence length — How many touches? (Default: 3-4 over 3-4 weeks)

Phase 1: Churned Account Research

For each account in the churn list, research what's changed:

1A: Company Changes

Search: "[company name]" funding OR raised OR "series" OR acquisition 2025 2026
Search: "[company name]" hiring OR "we're hiring" OR "growing team"
Search: "[company name]" launch OR "new product" OR expansion OR pivot

Extract:

  • Funding: New round raised? (More budget available)
  • Growth: Headcount increasing? New hires in relevant roles?
  • Product changes: Launched something new that would benefit from your product?
  • Market moves: Entered a new market, new partnerships?

1B: Contact Changes

Search: "[contact name]" "[company name]" OR linkedin.com
Search: "[company name]" "[relevant title]" new OR hired OR promoted

Determine:

  • Same contact still there? If yes, continuity helps. If no, find the new person.
  • Contact promoted? More authority = bigger potential deal.
  • New decision-maker? Fresh eyes, no baggage from the old experience.

1C: Competitor Dissatisfaction Signals

If you know which competitor they switched to:

Search: "[competitor name]" complaints OR issues OR "looking for alternative"
Search: "[competitor name]" site:g2.com negative reviews
Search: "[company name]" "[competitor name]" OR "switched from"

Look for:

  • Public complaints about the competitor they switched to
  • Reviews mentioning problems that your product solves
  • Signs of "buyer's remorse" in the market

1D: Product-Churn Fit Analysis

Match what's changed in your product against their churn reason:

Churn ReasonProduct UpdateWin-Back Angle
"Too expensive"New pricing tier / startup discountPrice-based re-engagement
"Missing [feature]"[Feature] shippedFeature announcement
"Too complex"Simplified onboarding / UX overhaul"We listened" narrative
"Switched to [competitor]"Competitive advantage developedCompetitive displacement
"Didn't see ROI"New ROI dashboard / case studiesProof-based approach
"Champion left"N/A — find new championFresh start narrative
"Company downsized"Company now growing again (from research)Timing-based re-engagement

Phase 2: Win-Back Scoring

Score each churned account's re-engagement potential:

Win-Back Score = (Change Signal × Churn Reason Addressability × Account Value) / Time Decay

Change Signal (1-5):
  5 = Multiple strong signals (funding + growth + competitor issues)
  4 = One strong signal (funding or significant growth)
  3 = Moderate signal (hiring, product launch)
  2 = Minor signal (still operating, no major changes)
  1 = No detectable change

Churn Reason Addressability (1-3):
  3 = You've directly fixed the reason they left
  2 = Partially addressed or different angle available
  1 = Same issues exist / unknown churn reason

Account Value (multiplier):
  2.0x = Was top 20% by MRR
  1.5x = Mid-tier MRR
  1.0x = Lower MRR

Time Decay (divisor):
  1.0 = Churned 3-6 months ago (sweet spot)
  1.2 = Churned 6-12 months ago
  1.5 = Churned 12-18 months ago
  2.0 = Churned 18+ months ago

Priority Tiers

TierScoreAction
High Priority8+Full personalized sequence + founder outreach
Medium Priority4-7Personalized sequence
Low Priority1-3Batch campaign or skip

Phase 3: Sequence Generation

Win-Back Sequence — High Priority (4 emails over 4 weeks)

Email 1: The Relevant Update (Day 0)

Subject options:
A: "[First name], [specific thing] changed since we last spoke"
B: "We fixed the thing that made you leave"
C: "[Company] + [Your Product] — worth another look?"

---

Hi [First name],

[1 sentence acknowledging they left — no guilt, no desperation]

Since then, we've [specific improvement that addresses their churn reason]:

- [Change 1 — most relevant to their pain]
- [Change 2]
- [Change 3]

[If you have a relevant customer proof point]:
"[Company in their space] switched back and saw [result]."

Would it be worth a 15-minute look at what's different?

[Soft CTA — no pressure]

[Signature]

Email 2: The Proof Point (Day 7)

Subject: "How [similar company] is using [product] now"

Hi [First name],

Quick follow-up — wanted to share something relevant.

[Case study or proof point from a company similar to theirs]:
- [What they achieved]
- [Metric that matters]

[1 sentence connecting this to their specific situation]

[CTA — slightly stronger: "Want me to show you the new [feature] in 10 minutes?"]

[Signature]

Email 3: The Offer (Day 14)

Subject: "[Specific offer — e.g., 'Free migration + 30 days on us']"

Hi [First name],

I know switching tools is a pain — that's usually what keeps people from
coming back even when the product has improved.

So we're making it easy:
- [Offer detail 1 — e.g., "We'll handle the full migration"]
- [Offer detail 2 — e.g., "30 days free to test everything"]
- [Offer detail 3 — e.g., "Dedicated onboarding session"]

[If applicable: "This offer is available through [date]"]

Worth a conversation?

[Signature]

Email 4: The Breakup (Day 28)

Subject: "Closing the loop"

Hi [First name],

Totally understand if the timing isn't right — just wanted to
make sure this didn't slip through the cracks.

Quick summary of what's new:
→ [Key improvement 1]
→ [Key improvement 2]
→ [Standing offer, if applicable]

If anything changes on your end, my inbox is always open.

[Signature]

P.S. [Genuinely helpful resource — e.g., "We just published [relevant content].
Worth a read regardless of which tool you're using."]

Win-Back Sequence — Medium Priority (3 emails over 3 weeks)

Shorter, less personalized but still relevant:

Email 1: Product update announcement + relevance to their use case Email 2: Customer proof point + specific offer Email 3: Soft breakup with resource share

Win-Back Sequence — Competitor-Specific

If they switched to a known competitor:

Email 1: "How [product] compares to [competitor] today" — honest, non-aggressive comparison focused on what changed Email 2: Customer story of someone who switched back from that specific competitor Email 3: Offer + easy migration path

Phase 4: Output Format

# Win-Back Opportunity Report — [DATE]
Churned accounts analyzed: [N]
Time window: [Churned between X and Y months ago]

---

## Summary

| Priority | Accounts | Total MRR Opportunity |
|----------|----------|----------------------|
| High Priority | [N] | $[X]/mo |
| Medium Priority | [N] | $[X]/mo |
| Low Priority / Skip | [N] | $[X]/mo |

**Total recoverable MRR:** $[X]/mo (estimated, assuming [Y%] win-back rate)

---

## High Priority Accounts

### [Company 1] — Churned: [date] | Former MRR: $[X]
**Churn reason:** [Reason]
**What's changed (them):** [Research findings]
**What's changed (us):** [Product updates that address their pain]
**Win-back angle:** [The core pitch]
**Contact:** [Name, title, email]
**Sequence:** [Attached — 4 emails, personalized]

### [Company 2] — ...

---

## Medium Priority Accounts

| Account | Churned | MRR | Churn Reason | Win-Back Angle | Score |
|---------|---------|-----|-------------|---------------|-------|
| [Name] | [Date] | $[X] | [Reason] | [Angle] | [N] |

---

## Email Sequences

### [Company 1] — Full Personalized Sequence
[Email 1: Subject + body]
[Email 2: Subject + body]
[Email 3: Subject + body]
[Email 4: Subject + body]

### [Company 2] — ...

---

## Accounts to Skip (and Why)

| Account | Reason to Skip |
|---------|---------------|
| [Name] | [Still in same situation / company shut down / too recent] |

---

## Win-Back Campaign Setup

If using Smartlead:
- Campaign name: "Win-Back — [Month] [Year]"
- Sequences: [Use generated sequences above]
- Timing: [Recommended send schedule]
- Sender: [Recommended — founder for high priority, CSM for medium]

Save to clients/<client-name>/customer-success/win-back/win-back-report-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.

Cost

ComponentCost
Web research per churned accountFree
LinkedIn research (optional)~$0.25-0.50 per account
Sequence generationFree (LLM reasoning)
TotalFree — $5 (for ~10 accounts with LinkedIn research)

Tools Required

  • web_search — for company and competitor research
  • fetch_webpage — for career pages, news, competitor reviews
  • Optional: linkedin-profile-post-scraper for contact monitoring
  • Optional: review-site-scraper for competitor dissatisfaction signals
  • Optional: cold-email-outreach for campaign creation

Trigger Phrases

  • "Which churned customers should we win back?"
  • "Build a win-back sequence for [customer]"
  • "Research our churn list for re-engagement"
  • "Run the win-back scan"
  • "Generate win-back emails for churned accounts"

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月23日 更新

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月23日 更新

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月23日 更新

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月23日 更新

Checks paid ads against the ad platform's rules (Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and others) and the brand's category rules: the copy, on-image or on-screen text, pictures and people. Rewrites what can be fixed honestly, adds the disclosures that are needed, and flags anything that needs a human or legal review, with one pass, fixed or flag line per ad and platform. Use alone when you already have the ad text or images and know where they will run; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. make-static-ads, make-content, email-lifecycle).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月23日 更新

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月23日 更新

查看 gooseworks-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题