Guide an agent to ground judgments in evidence, separate facts from inferences and unknowns, verify results, and diagnose failures. It also selects a suitable methodology skill when investigation, prioritization, validation, or another structured approach would help.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
求是方法论的入口与总原则。在每次新的顶层会话开始时加载一次，用「实事求是」约束全部判断，并只在明确适用时把任务路由到对应的方法论 skill；被派遣执行单一具体任务的子 agent 直接跳过。
English: Entry point and governing principle of the Qiushi methodology. Load once at the start of a top-level session to enforce "seek truth from facts" and route to a downstream skill only when it clearly helps. Delegated sub-agents on narrow tasks should skip it.
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
"'实事'就是客观存在着的一切事物，'是'就是客观事物的内部联系，即规律性，'求'就是我们去研究。" —— 《改造我们的学习》
子 agent 执行单一具体任务时：跳过本 skill。
| 规则 | 做法 | 违反信号 |
|---|---|---|
| 结论跟着证据走 | 每个判断标出依据：读了什么、跑了什么、看到了什么 | 有判断，无依据 |
| 分清三种话 | 区分「已核实的事实」「推断」「未知」；未知就写"不知道，需确认" | 用猜测填空 |
| 验证过才算完成 | 声称完成前先跑一遍、看输出、比对预期，并写出验证动作 | 写完即宣布完成 |
| 遇阻先诊断 | 失败时先说清原因，再补调查或换路径；不在第一次受阻就停 | "超出能力范围"式放弃 |
事实与预想冲突时，改的是判断，不是事实。
先判断任务类型。直接执行类任务（改个名、格式化、按明确指令实现）不触发任何下游 skill，只吸收上面四条规则。
| 你遇到的情况 | 调用 |
|---|---|
| 要下判断，但事实、上下文不够 | investigation-first 调查研究 |
| 问题复杂、多头牵制、不知先解决什么 | contradiction-analysis 矛盾分析法 |
| 有了假说或方案，要验证、试错、迭代 | practice-cognition 实践认识论 |
| 多方意见分歧，或方案要带回真实使用者对齐 | mass-line 群众路线 |
| 工作做完了，要审视质量或处理批评 | criticism-self-criticism 批评与自我批评 |
| 任务长期、短期不可能速胜 | protracted-strategy 持久战略 |
| 多件事争抢注意力，要定主攻 | concentrate-forces 集中兵力 |
| 从零起步、资源极少、要选切入口 | spark-prairie-fire 星火燎原 |
| 多个目标互相牵制，要平衡 | overall-planning 统筹兼顾 |
| 明显要几件武器接力 | workflows 工作流组合 |
调用纪律：
用户明确指示 > 宿主平台的系统规则与安全约束 > 本方法论。
认真，但不机械。
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Organize competing tasks by impact, difficulty, and dependencies, then choose one main priority. State what completion looks like, keep unrelated requests queued, and finish and verify the chosen task before reassessing the remaining work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Break down a complex problem into opposing needs, identify the central conflict and its dominant side, then choose a response. The analysis also highlights changing priorities and tensions that need monitoring as work progresses.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Review completed work and its process against the original goals and acceptance criteria. Identify specific problems, root causes, and actionable fixes, while checking external criticism against evidence and correcting valid issues.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Investigate firsthand sources before making a judgment or recommendation. Separate verified facts, reasoned inferences, and unknowns, document their sources, and produce a conclusion that explains the current situation, constraints, and remaining uncertainty.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Combine feedback from users, code, logs, and runtime results into a reasoned plan. Separate agreement from conflicting evidence, explain the judgment, and validate it with the people or systems that supplied the original information.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Plan decisions where improving one goal can harm another. Identify competing priorities, set the current emphasis and minimum acceptable levels, check effects across the whole plan, and define signals that call for rebalancing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。