Investigate firsthand sources before making a judgment or recommendation. Separate verified facts, reasoned inferences, and unknowns, document their sources, and produce a conclusion that explains the current situation, constraints, and remaining uncertainty.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
调查研究：在下判断、做决策、给建议之前，先用第一手材料弄清现状，产出「事实 / 推断 / 未知」三栏调查结论。当上下文不完整、证据薄弱、领域陌生、用户说"先别动手"、或你发现自己在凭印象作答时触发；已充分调查后的执行阶段不要重复触发。
English: Investigate before judging. Gather firsthand facts and produce a fact / inference / unknown ledger before any recommendation. Trigger when context is incomplete, evidence is thin, the domain is unfamiliar, the user says "look first", or you notice yourself answering from impression; skip when investigation is already done and the task is pure execution.
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
"没有调查，没有发言权。" —— 《反对本本主义》
调查研究是落实「实事求是」的入口：不是为既定结论找材料，而是让事实规定判断。
用：
不用：
调查目的：……
调查范围：读了 …… / 跑了 …… / 问了 ……
已核实的事实（附来源）：
- ……（来源：文件:行 / 命令输出 / 日志）
合理推断（说明推理链）：
- ……（因为 …… 所以 ……）
未知 / 存疑：
- ……（需要 …… 才能确认）
调查结论：
- 现状是：……
- 关键约束是：……
- 我原来不知道、现在知道的是：……
- 基于以上，我的判断是：……（置信度：高 / 中 / 低）
contradiction-analysispractice-cognitioninvestigator 子 agent 并行调查，主线只汇总三栏原著依据：original-texts.md
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Guide an agent to ground judgments in evidence, separate facts from inferences and unknowns, verify results, and diagnose failures. It also selects a suitable methodology skill when investigation, prioritization, validation, or another structured approach would help.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Organize competing tasks by impact, difficulty, and dependencies, then choose one main priority. State what completion looks like, keep unrelated requests queued, and finish and verify the chosen task before reassessing the remaining work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Break down a complex problem into opposing needs, identify the central conflict and its dominant side, then choose a response. The analysis also highlights changing priorities and tensions that need monitoring as work progresses.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Review completed work and its process against the original goals and acceptance criteria. Identify specific problems, root causes, and actionable fixes, while checking external criticism against evidence and correcting valid issues.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Combine feedback from users, code, logs, and runtime results into a reasoned plan. Separate agreement from conflicting evidence, explain the judgment, and validate it with the people or systems that supplied the original information.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Plan decisions where improving one goal can harm another. Identify competing priorities, set the current emphasis and minimum acceptable levels, check effects across the whole plan, and define signals that call for rebalancing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。