跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

journal-fit-screening

Use when choosing a journal for a finished or nearly finished manuscript, when index status in Scopus, SSCI, ESCI, or TR Dizin must be confirmed, when a venue looks predatory, or when a cover letter needs drafting from the manuscript's actual claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Journal Fit Screening

When to use

Use this skill when the manuscript exists and the question is where to send it. It covers scope matching, index verification, predatory screening, and the cover letter. It does not improve the manuscript itself; for that, return to the writing and verification skills first. It is not for managing authorship contributions or open-science release decisions; those belong to authorship-contribution-ledger and open-science-release-packager.

Inputs

  • The abstract and the contribution claims of the manuscript.
  • The indexing requirement that actually binds the author: institution, graduation rule, or incentive system, naming the index.
  • Open access budget, if any.
  • Candidate journals already under consideration, if any.

Workflow

  1. Extract the manuscript's contribution claims and its method profile from the abstract, and write them as a short fit profile.
  2. Build the candidate list from journal scope statements and recent tables of contents. A journal title is marketing, the scope statement and what it actually published last year are evidence.
  3. Verify index status in the index's own master list for the current year. Scopus, Web of Science, and TR Dizin each publish authoritative lists, and a journal's webpage claim is never sufficient.
  4. Screen for predatory signals in the Think Check Submit discipline: a verifiable editorial board, transparent article processing charges, honest indexing claims, a real review timeline, and a publisher with a traceable record. Record the evidence behind each flag.
  5. Rank the surviving candidates by fit, with the reason stated per journal: scope match, method fit, audience, timeline, cost.
  6. Draft the cover letter from the fit profile. Every sentence in the letter must be supported by the manuscript, and the editor's name and journal scope reference must be current.
  7. Record the screening evidence per journal so the decision can be audited later. When the selected journal requires open-access compliance or data sharing, hand the decision record to open-science-release-packager and flag any authorship order questions for authorship-contribution-ledger.

Output

Return:

  • The fit profile of the manuscript.
  • A ranked candidate table with index status, verified in the index master list, cost, and fit reasons.
  • Predatory screening notes with evidence per flag.
  • A cover letter draft.
  • The screening evidence record.
  • What to record at session end: the ranked candidate table, any predatory flags with their evidence, the cover letter draft, and a one-line note for the AI-use disclosure.

Verification

  • Index status of every recommended journal was checked in the index's own current list, with the date of the check recorded.
  • No journal is recommended on its self-description alone.
  • Article processing charges are stated with their source.
  • The cover letter contains no claim that is absent from the manuscript.
  • Predatory flags are written as factual observations with evidence, never as bare accusations.
  • Before closing: the screening evidence for every recommended journal is saved where the next session can find it, and any open-science or authorship obligations flagged by the selected journal have been routed to the appropriate skill.

Safety

Index status comes only from the index's own current list, never from memory or the journal's webpage. Predatory screening output is a risk assessment for the author's decision, so keep its wording factual and evidence-bound. Submission itself, author agreements, and fee payments stay on the user's side.

Example prompt

"Bu nitel çalışmayı Scopus kapsamında bir dergiye göndermem gerekiyor, üç aday belirle ve kapak mektubunu hazırla."

Expected smoke output:

  • A fit profile and a ranked table of candidates with verified index status.
  • Predatory screening notes for any flagged candidate.
  • A cover letter skeleton built from the manuscript's claims.

Türkçe kullanım notu

Bu beceri, bitmiş bir el yazması için dergi seçimini kanıta bağlar. Dizin durumu derginin kendi sayfasından değil dizinin güncel ana listesinden doğrulanır, Scopus, SSCI ve TR Dizin katmanları kurumunuzun gerçek şartına göre ayrıştırılır, şüpheli dergiler kanıtlı bayraklarla işaretlenir. Kapak mektubu el yazmasında olmayan hiçbir iddia içermez. Gönderim ve ücret işlemleri her zaman sizde kalır. Seçilen dergi açık erişim zorunluluğu veya veri paylaşımı gerektiriyorsa open-science-release-packager becerisi devreye girer.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when a complete research workflow — its instructions, skills, data boundaries, and tool connections — must be assessed for portability across AI agents or environments, so each component is explicitly mapped before migration rather than assumed to transfer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when AI contribution metadata must match the actual workflow, when model alias and dated identifiers need auditing, when verified and fabricated citation counts feed a release decision, or when a venue's AI disclosure statement needs evidence behind it.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a draft in Turkish, English, or both reads as AI-generated and needs revision that removes machine writing patterns and translation calques while preserving meaning, citations, statistics, and the author's voice.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a reference list needs APA 7 cleanup, when DOIs must be confirmed real against Crossref or PubMed, when the user asks whether AI-suggested citations actually exist, or when a manuscript needs a citation hygiene pass before submission or defense.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

查看 OnourImpram 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题