跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

regional-access-workflow

Use when a source must be reached through DergiPark, ULAKBIM TR Dizin, HEAL-Link, YOK Thesis Center, or an institutional library route, when off-campus access fails, or when a lawful retrieval plan is needed for Turkish, Greek, or European materials.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Regional Access Workflow

When to use

Use this skill when a researcher needs a lawful and reproducible route to regional academic sources, especially Turkish, Greek, European, university, thesis, or institutional materials. It picks up the search protocol from social-science-literature-triage and writes what it finds into source-passport-ledger entries. It is not for building a systematic PRISMA search log across multiple databases, that is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.

Inputs

  • Source target or research topic.
  • Country, language, or institution scope.
  • Known databases.
  • Access constraints.
  • Whether the user has authorized institutional access.

Workflow

  1. Classify the source need as journal article, thesis, report, guideline, book, dataset, or policy document.
  2. Route the search to regional sources such as DergiPark, ULAKBIM TR Dizin, YOK Thesis Center, HEAL-Link, university repositories, or library discovery systems.
  3. Route international metadata to Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Semantic Scholar, or OpenAlex when available.
  4. Record access status, metadata status, DOI status, and full-text status separately.
  5. Keep login, VPN, and institutional identity steps on the user's side.
  6. Produce a source passport entry for each located item.
  7. Flag unresolved access problems and lawful next steps.

Output

Return:

  • Access route map.
  • Search locations.
  • Metadata fields to capture.
  • DOI and identifier status.
  • Full-text access status.
  • Source passport template.
  • Manual user actions.
  • Blockers and alternatives.
  • What to record at session end: the databases searched, each source passport entry created, and any unresolved access blockers with the lawful next step noted.

Verification

  • The workflow never bypasses paywalls, licenses, or institutional access controls.
  • DOI absence is not treated as evidence that a source is invalid.
  • Regional databases are not replaced by global search alone.
  • Full-text status is separated from metadata existence.
  • User-side login actions are clearly marked.
  • Before closing: all located source passport entries are ready to hand to source-passport-ledger, and any systematic search log is flagged for prisma-scoping-review-pipeline if the review protocol requires it.

Safety

Do not request or store VPN credentials, library passwords, proxy URLs containing tokens, or institutional session cookies. Do not download full text through unauthorized routes.

Example prompt

"Find a lawful access workflow for Turkish clinical psychology theses and DergiPark articles on digital addiction."

Expected smoke output:

  • YOK Thesis Center, DergiPark, TR Dizin, Crossref, and library discovery lanes.
  • A source passport template with access status and DOI status.
  • Manual login steps left to the user.

Türkçe kullanım notu

Bu beceri, bir kaynağa yasal ve tekrarlanabilir bir erişim yolu kurar. Bölgesel diziler, üniversite depoları ve kütüphane keşif sistemleri uluslararası kanallarla birlikte haritalanır, giriş ve VPN adımları her zaman sizde kalır. Açık erişim önce denenir, bulunan her kaynak için bir pasaport kaydı oluşturulur ve erişilemeyen kaynaklar için erişimin mümkün olmadığı açıkça belirtilir.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when a complete research workflow — its instructions, skills, data boundaries, and tool connections — must be assessed for portability across AI agents or environments, so each component is explicitly mapped before migration rather than assumed to transfer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when AI contribution metadata must match the actual workflow, when model alias and dated identifiers need auditing, when verified and fabricated citation counts feed a release decision, or when a venue's AI disclosure statement needs evidence behind it.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a draft in Turkish, English, or both reads as AI-generated and needs revision that removes machine writing patterns and translation calques while preserving meaning, citations, statistics, and the author's voice.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a reference list needs APA 7 cleanup, when DOIs must be confirmed real against Crossref or PubMed, when the user asks whether AI-suggested citations actually exist, or when a manuscript needs a citation hygiene pass before submission or defense.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

查看 OnourImpram 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题