Use for the search-planning stage of a literature review, when database lanes and language layers must be chosen, when DOI coverage policy is unclear, or when inclusion and exclusion criteria need drafting before any source is read; not for running the screening and PRISMA pipeline of a formal review, which is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use this skill before a literature review, scoping review, thesis chapter, grant background, or manuscript introduction when the user needs a search plan that can survive method review rather than an immediate prose draft. Its protocol feeds regional-access-workflow for retrieval and source-passport-ledger for tracking what the search returns. It is not for running a full PRISMA-compliant systematic review pipeline, that is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.
Return a compact protocol with these headings:
Do not request passwords, private vault paths, university database credentials, VPN secrets, or raw clinical data. If full-text access requires a logged-in institution, stop at the lawful access workflow and ask the user to retrieve the file through their own authorized route.
"Scope a Turkish and English literature review on AI-assisted clinical psychology supervision, 2020 to 2026, with DOI discipline and regional database coverage."
Expected smoke output:
Bu beceri, literatür taramasına başlamadan önce yöntem incelemesine dayanacak bir arama planı kurar. Veritabanı kanalları, dil katmanları, DOI beklentileri ve dahil etme ölçütleri tek protokolde toplanır, bölgesel kaynaklar gözden kaçırılmaz. Arama dizgileri başka bir araştırmacının aynı sonuçlara ulaşabileceği kadar açık yazılır, yanlılık riskleri daha ilk adımda not edilir. Plan hazır olduğunda erişim için regional-access-workflow, bulunanların izlenmesi için source-passport-ledger devreye girer. Tam sistematik derleme gerekiyorsa prisma-scoping-review-pipeline'a devredilir. Oturum sonunda arama protokolü ve yapay zekâ katkı notu kaydedilir. Paylaşılan kimlik bilgileri veya kurumsal politika dışı yollarla erişim bu becerinin kapsamı dışındadır — yasal erişim yolları için regional-access-workflow devreye girer.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Use when a complete research workflow — its instructions, skills, data boundaries, and tool connections — must be assessed for portability across AI agents or environments, so each component is explicitly mapped before migration rather than assumed to transfer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when AI contribution metadata must match the actual workflow, when model alias and dated identifiers need auditing, when verified and fabricated citation counts feed a release decision, or when a venue's AI disclosure statement needs evidence behind it.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a draft in Turkish, English, or both reads as AI-generated and needs revision that removes machine writing patterns and translation calques while preserving meaning, citations, statistics, and the author's voice.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a reference list needs APA 7 cleanup, when DOIs must be confirmed real against Crossref or PubMed, when the user asks whether AI-suggested citations actually exist, or when a manuscript needs a citation hygiene pass before submission or defense.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。