跨多个来源检索学术文献、核对引文并转换参考文献文件;可使用MeSH设计PubMed检索式,也可区分独立他引与自引,整理引用者及引用语境。
- 跨多个来源检索文献
- 核对文档中的引文信息
- 用MeSH设计PubMed检索式
精读一篇科学论文,并整理成含16项内容的卡片,拆解方法、核对主张与实验依据、记录局限并提出研究假设,同时标注出处和无法判断的部分。
Build a structured deep-reading Paper Card for one scientific paper, analysing methods, experiment-to-claim evidence, limitations, and research ideas. Use for 论文精读卡、方法拆解、证据链分析; not full-paper bilingual translation or formal peer review.
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法此技能会精读一篇科学论文,并将研究问题、方法构成及其前提、实验结果、局限和研究设想整理为包含16项内容的 Paper Card。它会把核心主张与支持主张的实验、图表对应起来,并标明出处位置。卡片会区分作者的陈述与代理的分析;研究设想会作为假设呈现。
当你想确认论文结论由哪些证据支持,而不只查看结论本身时,可以使用此技能。它适合梳理研究方法、核对对比实验和评价指标、整理证据不足之处,也可作为思考后续研究主题的阅读记录。
此技能不用于全文翻译或正式同行评审。处理 PDF 或已有的原文对应数据时,需要用 Python 运行随附脚本。资料不完整时,卡片会标明无法评估的项目,并且不会使用未经确认的页码。完成草稿后,随附的审计脚本会检查论点与证据的对应关系。
本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。
AI 根据 SKILL.md 的内容检查了需要注意的操作和使用前提。评分只依据实际运行的结果(实测对比)。
不计入评分。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月24日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use this skill to turn one paper into an evidence-grounded research card, not a translated abstract, generic summary, reviewer report, or publication article.
The skill uses:
static/core/ for principles, workflow, and the fixed output contract;static/fragments/paper_type/;Follow these steps every time.
Read manifest.yaml, then read every file under always_load. Do not generate the card from this router alone.
Identify which material is available:
nature-reader artifact with stable source IDs.Prefer an existing nature-reader artifact when supplied. Do not repeat full bilingual translation or figure extraction. If only partial material is available, create a visibly partial card and mark every unsupported section Not assessable from supplied material.
For a PDF or nature-reader source-map JSON, the bundled script is mandatory.
SKILL_DIR as the directory containing this loaded SKILL.md.SKILL_DIR/scripts/prepare_paper.py exists.python "SKILL_DIR/scripts/prepare_paper.py" INPUT \
--output WORKDIR/source_bundle.json
Add --render-dir WORKDIR/rendered-pages when visual page review is needed. Inspect the script exit code and the bundle validation block before drafting.
For source-map input, also inspect locator_summary and unlocated_blocks. Only records under pages have verified positive PDF page locators. Missing or invalid page locators remain in unlocated_blocks with an explicit status and must be cited structurally, never as page 1.
Never write inline Python, a temporary extraction script, or a replacement script during a Paper Card run. Never patch the bundled scripts during a normal Paper Card run. Modify these scripts only when the user explicitly asks to develop, debug, or improve the skill itself.
Use this fixed locator state machine:
page-grounded: the bundled script succeeds and validates reliable PDF page indices. Use PDF page plus structural locators. Printed page labels are optional metadata.structure-grounded: page extraction is unreliable, but reliable sections, figures, tables, equations, source blocks, or full text remain available. Do not emit page-number citations.source-limited: only an abstract, metadata, or user-provided excerpt is reliable. Do not emit page-number citations or infer unseen evidence.If preparation fails, record the failure. Prefer an existing nature-reader source map or the environment PDF/OCR capability, but do not create a replacement script. Then enter the strongest supported fallback mode.
Use the manifest to choose one primary paper_type and, only for a genuinely hybrid paper, one secondary contribution lens:
methodsdiscoveryresourceclinicalmaterialsreviewLoad the primary fragment and no more than one secondary fragment. Classify by the paper's argument and evidence structure, not merely its discipline. State both selections before analysis. For example, an algorithm paper that also introduces a substantial dataset may use methods as the primary lens and resource as the secondary lens.
Build an internal evidence inventory before drafting. At minimum, enumerate:
nature-reader block IDs.Then build a compact claim-evidence matrix linking each central claim to the evidence that supports it and to any unresolved gap.
Use external search only for Section 04, Section 15, bibliographic verification, or an explicit novelty check. Never present the paper's own related-work narrative as independently verified field history. Record whether the context mode is paper-only, targeted external check, or externally verified.
Apply, in order:
Read references/evidence-and-provenance.md before making analytical or externally verified claims. Read references/card-schema.md when drafting the final Markdown. Read references/research-idea-gates.md before writing Section 16.
Write a real Markdown artifact, defaulting to paper-card.md. Keep all 16 numbered sections in order, but write Not applicable or Not assessable instead of inventing content.
Match the user's language by default. The skill source and schema remain English, but localize the Paper Card headings and prose when the user writes in another language. Preserve canonical technical terms and formulas.
Before delivery, resolve the bundled auditor from SKILL_DIR. In page-grounded mode, run:
python "SKILL_DIR/scripts/audit_paper_card.py" \
--card WORKDIR/paper-card.md \
--bundle WORKDIR/source_bundle.json \
--locator-mode page-grounded \
--report WORKDIR/audit-report.json
In either fallback mode, run the same auditor without a bundle:
python "SKILL_DIR/scripts/audit_paper_card.py" \
--card WORKDIR/paper-card.md \
--locator-mode structure-grounded-or-source-limited \
--report WORKDIR/audit-report.json
Replace the last value with the actual canonical mode. Treat audit errors as blockers. Review warnings with scientific judgment rather than suppressing them mechanically.
Also verify:
If the auditor itself cannot run, state that failure and manually apply only its documented checks. Do not write a substitute auditor.
extract_pdf.py, parse_paper.py, or another one-off replacement.nature-reader for full-text bilingual reading artifacts, extraction, and stable source maps.nature-academic-search when external literature is needed to verify field history or knowledge connections.nature-reviewer for formal reviewer-style manuscript assessment.nature-literature-pipeline for batch discovery and lightweight monitoring notes.nature-paper2ppt when the requested end product is a presentation.Do not silently switch the requested Paper Card into any of these outputs.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
跨多个来源检索学术文献、核对引文并转换参考文献文件;可使用MeSH设计PubMed检索式,也可区分独立他引与自引,整理引用者及引用语境。
在指定的Nature系列或CNS相关期刊范围内查找论文,核对摘要或出版社页面,将文献对应到稿件中的具体论点,并导出经核实、可导入文献管理软件的参考信息。
起草或检查论文的数据与代码可用性声明,整理数据来源、存储位置、访问限制、标识符和正式引用,并核对有助于发现与复用数据的元数据。
通过开放获取、出版社 API 或机构授权渠道获取学术论文全文和补充材料。它会为每篇文献选择获取途径,并记录文件格式、来源和下载结果。
把实验照片、音频和文字整理成带结构化元数据的 Markdown 日志,分配实验编号和样品批次编号,并归档原始附件;还可选接入飞书群消息或 Obsidian。
使用Python或R创建、修改并导出论文科学图,检查多面板对齐、文字和元素重叠。也可制作可编辑的矢量示意图,以及经明确要求生成的图形摘要。