跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

nature-paper-card

精读一篇科学论文,并整理成含16项内容的卡片,拆解方法、核对主张与实验依据、记录局限并提出研究假设,同时标注出处和无法判断的部分。

原文查看原文说明

Build a structured deep-reading Paper Card for one scientific paper, analysing methods, experiment-to-claim evidence, limitations, and research ideas. Use for 论文精读卡、方法拆解、证据链分析; not full-paper bilingual translation or formal peer review.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 拆解论文方法及其前提
  • 核对主张与实验依据
  • 整理局限和证据缺口
  • 从精读中构思研究假设

中文介绍

功能

此技能会精读一篇科学论文,并将研究问题、方法构成及其前提、实验结果、局限和研究设想整理为包含16项内容的 Paper Card。它会把核心主张与支持主张的实验、图表对应起来,并标明出处位置。卡片会区分作者的陈述与代理的分析;研究设想会作为假设呈现。

适用场景

当你想确认论文结论由哪些证据支持,而不只查看结论本身时,可以使用此技能。它适合梳理研究方法、核对对比实验和评价指标、整理证据不足之处,也可作为思考后续研究主题的阅读记录。

使用示例

  • “请把这篇论文的方法和支持其主张的实验整理成卡片。”
  • “请依据图表总结论文的局限和未解决的问题。”
  • “请提出可以从这篇论文延伸出的研究假设。”

注意事项

此技能不用于全文翻译或正式同行评审。处理 PDF 或已有的原文对应数据时,需要用 Python 运行随附脚本。资料不完整时,卡片会标明无法评估的项目,并且不会使用未经确认的页码。完成草稿后,随附的审计脚本会检查论点与证据的对应关系。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

文档检查

AI 根据 SKILL.md 的内容检查了需要注意的操作和使用前提。评分只依据实际运行的结果(实测对比)。

安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
B部分不足必须运行随附的 Python 脚本,但对其操作影响的说明有限。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
A良好明确写出了处理 PDF 所需的 Python 和随附脚本命令。

不计入评分。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月24日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(22)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml244 B
  • evals/evals.json3.0 KB
  • manifest.yaml2.7 KB
  • README_EN.md4.2 KB
  • README.md3.8 KB
  • references/card-schema.md5.2 KB
  • references/evidence-and-provenance.md2.8 KB
  • references/research-idea-gates.md1.2 KB
  • scripts/audit_paper_card.py15.0 KB
  • scripts/prepare_paper.py17.6 KB
  • static/core/output-contract.md2.8 KB
  • static/core/principles.md2.4 KB
  • static/core/workflow.md5.5 KB
  • static/fragments/paper_type/clinical.md722 B
  • static/fragments/paper_type/discovery.md614 B
  • static/fragments/paper_type/materials.md710 B
  • static/fragments/paper_type/methods.md873 B
  • static/fragments/paper_type/resource.md837 B
  • static/fragments/paper_type/review.md764 B
  • tests/test_audit_page_ranges.py2.6 KB
  • tests/test_prepare_paper.py5.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Nature Paper Card - Router

Use this skill to turn one paper into an evidence-grounded research card, not a translated abstract, generic summary, reviewer report, or publication article.

The skill uses:

  • a static core under static/core/ for principles, workflow, and the fixed output contract;
  • one paper-type fragment under static/fragments/paper_type/;
  • on-demand references for evidence labels, the exact card schema, and research-idea checks.

Routing protocol

Follow these steps every time.

1. Load the manifest and core layer

Read manifest.yaml, then read every file under always_load. Do not generate the card from this router alone.

2. Establish the source boundary

Identify which material is available:

  • full paper with figures and tables;
  • paper text without reliable layout;
  • abstract or metadata only;
  • an existing nature-reader artifact with stable source IDs.

Prefer an existing nature-reader artifact when supplied. Do not repeat full bilingual translation or figure extraction. If only partial material is available, create a visibly partial card and mark every unsupported section Not assessable from supplied material.

For a PDF or nature-reader source-map JSON, the bundled script is mandatory.

  1. Resolve SKILL_DIR as the directory containing this loaded SKILL.md.
  2. Verify SKILL_DIR/scripts/prepare_paper.py exists.
  3. Run exactly the bundled script by its resolved path:
python "SKILL_DIR/scripts/prepare_paper.py" INPUT \
  --output WORKDIR/source_bundle.json

Add --render-dir WORKDIR/rendered-pages when visual page review is needed. Inspect the script exit code and the bundle validation block before drafting.

For source-map input, also inspect locator_summary and unlocated_blocks. Only records under pages have verified positive PDF page locators. Missing or invalid page locators remain in unlocated_blocks with an explicit status and must be cited structurally, never as page 1.

Never write inline Python, a temporary extraction script, or a replacement script during a Paper Card run. Never patch the bundled scripts during a normal Paper Card run. Modify these scripts only when the user explicitly asks to develop, debug, or improve the skill itself.

Use this fixed locator state machine:

  • page-grounded: the bundled script succeeds and validates reliable PDF page indices. Use PDF page plus structural locators. Printed page labels are optional metadata.
  • structure-grounded: page extraction is unreliable, but reliable sections, figures, tables, equations, source blocks, or full text remain available. Do not emit page-number citations.
  • source-limited: only an abstract, metadata, or user-provided excerpt is reliable. Do not emit page-number citations or infer unseen evidence.

If preparation fails, record the failure. Prefer an existing nature-reader source map or the environment PDF/OCR capability, but do not create a replacement script. Then enter the strongest supported fallback mode.

3. Classify the paper type

Use the manifest to choose one primary paper_type and, only for a genuinely hybrid paper, one secondary contribution lens:

  • methods
  • discovery
  • resource
  • clinical
  • materials
  • review

Load the primary fragment and no more than one secondary fragment. Classify by the paper's argument and evidence structure, not merely its discipline. State both selections before analysis. For example, an algorithm paper that also introduces a substantial dataset may use methods as the primary lens and resource as the secondary lens.

4. Build the evidence base before drafting

Build an internal evidence inventory before drafting. At minimum, enumerate:

  • bibliographic metadata and access status;
  • research question and claimed contribution;
  • method components, assumptions, and data flow;
  • every main figure, table, and essential equation with its argumentative role;
  • experiments, baselines, metrics, ablations, and reported results;
  • author-stated limitations;
  • stable source pointers to pages, sections, equations, figures, tables, or nature-reader block IDs.

Then build a compact claim-evidence matrix linking each central claim to the evidence that supports it and to any unresolved gap.

Use external search only for Section 04, Section 15, bibliographic verification, or an explicit novelty check. Never present the paper's own related-work narrative as independently verified field history. Record whether the context mode is paper-only, targeted external check, or externally verified.

5. Generate the fixed Sections 01-16 Paper Card

Apply, in order:

  1. core principles;
  2. the selected paper-type fragment;
  3. core workflow;
  4. output contract.

Read references/evidence-and-provenance.md before making analytical or externally verified claims. Read references/card-schema.md when drafting the final Markdown. Read references/research-idea-gates.md before writing Section 16.

Write a real Markdown artifact, defaulting to paper-card.md. Keep all 16 numbered sections in order, but write Not applicable or Not assessable instead of inventing content.

Match the user's language by default. The skill source and schema remain English, but localize the Paper Card headings and prose when the user writes in another language. Preserve canonical technical terms and formulas.

6. Run groundedness QA

Before delivery, resolve the bundled auditor from SKILL_DIR. In page-grounded mode, run:

python "SKILL_DIR/scripts/audit_paper_card.py" \
  --card WORKDIR/paper-card.md \
  --bundle WORKDIR/source_bundle.json \
  --locator-mode page-grounded \
  --report WORKDIR/audit-report.json

In either fallback mode, run the same auditor without a bundle:

python "SKILL_DIR/scripts/audit_paper_card.py" \
  --card WORKDIR/paper-card.md \
  --locator-mode structure-grounded-or-source-limited \
  --report WORKDIR/audit-report.json

Replace the last value with the actual canonical mode. Treat audit errors as blockers. Review warnings with scientific judgment rather than suppressing them mechanically.

Also verify:

  • numerical results match the source;
  • the evidence inventory covers every main figure and table;
  • every major method, result, boundary, and limitation has a source pointer;
  • PDF page pointers distinguish PDF page index from printed page labels;
  • author statements are separated from Agent analysis;
  • external field-history claims have external citations or are marked unverified;
  • proposed ideas are hypotheses, not novelty claims;
  • Sections 17 and 18 do not exist;
  • no academic-English collection, comprehension quiz, or public-article draft was added.

If the auditor itself cannot run, state that failure and manually apply only its documented checks. Do not write a substitute auditor.

Script red lines

  • Do not resolve bundled scripts relative to the user's current working directory.
  • Do not write or execute inline Python as a substitute for either bundled script.
  • Do not create extract_pdf.py, parse_paper.py, or another one-off replacement.
  • Do not patch skill code during a normal Paper Card generation request.
  • Do not fabricate page numbers when preparation fails.
  • Do not remove all grounding in fallback mode; use structural locators or explicit source-scope locators.

Relationship to adjacent skills

  • Use nature-reader for full-text bilingual reading artifacts, extraction, and stable source maps.
  • Use nature-academic-search when external literature is needed to verify field history or knowledge connections.
  • Use nature-reviewer for formal reviewer-style manuscript assessment.
  • Use nature-literature-pipeline for batch discovery and lightweight monitoring notes.
  • Use nature-paper2ppt when the requested end product is a presentation.

Do not silently switch the requested Paper Card into any of these outputs.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

nature-academic-search

免费有简介

跨多个来源检索学术文献、核对引文并转换参考文献文件;可使用MeSH设计PubMed检索式,也可区分独立他引与自引,整理引用者及引用语境。

  • 跨多个来源检索文献
  • 核对文档中的引文信息
  • 用MeSH设计PubMed检索式
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills5万2026年10月22日 更新

nature-citation

免费有简介

在指定的Nature系列或CNS相关期刊范围内查找论文,核对摘要或出版社页面,将文献对应到稿件中的具体论点,并导出经核实、可导入文献管理软件的参考信息。

  • 为稿件补充Nature系列引文
  • 逐段整理论点与依据文献
  • 核实候选论文是否支持论点
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills5万2026年10月22日 更新

nature-data

免费有简介

起草或检查论文的数据与代码可用性声明,整理数据来源、存储位置、访问限制、标识符和正式引用,并核对有助于发现与复用数据的元数据。

  • 撰写数据或代码可用性声明
  • 整理研究数据的存储位置与获取方式
  • 检查数据集引用和元数据
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills5万2026年10月22日 更新

nature-downloader

免费有简介

通过开放获取、出版社 API 或机构授权渠道获取学术论文全文和补充材料。它会为每篇文献选择获取途径,并记录文件格式、来源和下载结果。

  • 批量获取 DOI 列表中的论文
  • 查找论文的开放版本
  • 通过机构 CNKI 获取中文论文
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills5万2026年10月22日 更新

nature-experiment-log

免费有简介

把实验照片、音频和文字整理成带结构化元数据的 Markdown 日志,分配实验编号和样品批次编号,并归档原始附件;还可选接入飞书群消息或 Obsidian。

  • 根据照片和音频整理实验日志
  • 追踪同一批样品的多次实验
  • 将实验记录与原始附件一起保存
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills5万2026年10月22日 更新

nature-figure

免费有简介

使用Python或R创建、修改并导出论文科学图,检查多面板对齐、文字和元素重叠。也可制作可编辑的矢量示意图,以及经明确要求生成的图形摘要。

  • 制作论文科学图
  • 检查多面板图的布局
  • 制作可编辑示意图
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills5万2026年10月22日 更新

查看 Yuan1z0825 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题