Review LinkedIn campaign exports or pasted metrics to identify weak click rates, audience targeting issues, form friction, and inefficient spending. Receive a structured audit with B2B benchmark comparisons and prioritized recommendations.
LinkedIn Ads campaign analysis for B2B marketers detecting CTR issues, audience quality problems, lead gen form friction, and budget inefficiencies. Use when pasting LinkedIn campaign exports, analyzing B2B ad performance, or auditing LinkedIn advertising spend. Platform: LinkedIn.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Analyze LinkedIn ad campaigns for B2B performance optimization.
| Metric | Good | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTR (Sponsored Content) | >0.5% | 0.3-0.5% | <0.3% |
| CTR (Text Ads) | >0.03% | 0.01-0.03% | <0.01% |
| CPC | <$5 | $5-10 | >$10 |
| CPL (Lead Gen Forms) | <$50 | $50-150 | >$150 |
| Lead Gen Form Completion | >15% | 10-15% | <10% |
| Engagement Rate | >2% | 1-2% | <1% |
| Fields | Expected Completion Rate |
|---|---|
| 3-4 fields | 15-25% |
| 5-6 fields | 10-15% |
| 7+ fields | <10% |
High-friction fields to avoid:
Use instead:
| Issue | Signal | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Overspending on awareness | High impressions, low CTR | Narrow audience |
| Audience too broad | Low CPL but poor lead quality | Add exclusions |
| Creative fatigue | CTR declining week-over-week | Refresh ads |
| Wrong objective | High CPC on brand awareness | Switch to lead gen |
## LinkedIn Ads Audit
**Account**: [Name]
**Analysis Period**: [Date Range]
**Total Spend**: $[Amount]
### Performance vs Benchmarks
| Metric | Your Performance | Benchmark | Status |
|--------|-----------------|-----------|--------|
| CTR | | 0.4% | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| CPC | | $7 | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| CPL | | $100 | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
### Audience Quality Assessment
- **Targeting**: [Evaluation]
- **Exclusions**: [Missing exclusions]
- **Size**: [Too broad/narrow/optimal]
### Lead Gen Form Analysis
- **Fields**: [Count]
- **Completion Rate**: [X]%
- **Friction Points**: [List]
### Top Issues
| Priority | Issue | Impact | Fix |
|----------|-------|--------|-----|
| 1 | | | |
| 2 | | | |
### Budget Recommendations
- [Recommendation 1]
- [Recommendation 2]
### Confidence Level: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
Input: "LinkedIn campaign: $5K spend, 500K impressions, 1,200 clicks, 45 leads. Targeting: Marketing Managers, Directors at companies 50-1000 employees. Lead form has 7 fields."
Output:
## LinkedIn Ads Audit
**Total Spend**: $5,000
**Leads**: 45
### Performance vs Benchmarks
| Metric | Your Performance | Benchmark | Status |
|--------|-----------------|-----------|--------|
| CTR | 0.24% | 0.4% | 🔴 Below |
| CPC | $4.17 | $7 | 🟢 Good |
| CPL | $111 | $100 | 🟡 Average |
### Lead Gen Form Analysis
- **Fields**: 7 (too many)
- **Expected Completion Rate**: <10%
- **Friction Points**: Reduce to 4 fields, use pre-filled data
### Top Issues
| Priority | Issue | Impact | Fix |
|----------|-------|--------|-----|
| 1 | Low CTR (0.24%) | Wasted impressions | Test new creative, tighten audience |
| 2 | 7 form fields | Low completion | Reduce to 4, remove phone |
### Confidence Level: HIGH
This skill works best with live account data. Connect the free Ryze MCP once and Claude reads your Google Ads, Meta Ads, GA4 and Search Console directly:
https://connector.get-ryze.ai/mcpclaude mcp add ryze --transport http https://connector.get-ryze.ai/mcpSetup guide: https://www.get-ryze.ai/how-to-connect-claude-to-google-meta-ads-mcp
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Analyze A/B test results to assess whether observed differences are likely due to chance. Check test duration and sample size, compare audience segments, distinguish statistical findings from practical value, and generate hypotheses for follow-up tests.
Plan and analyze A/B tests for Google and Meta advertising. Estimate required traffic and duration, track results, and assess whether observed differences are statistically significant, meaning unlikely to be explained by chance alone.
Review Google and Meta campaign structures against goals, budgets, and conversion data. Identify excessive segmentation, overlapping targeting, and fragmented budgets, then get consolidation recommendations, an explained account structure, and a migration plan.
Analyze successful Google and Meta ads to find useful patterns in headlines, body text, and calls to action. Generate new copy variants that preserve those patterns, with platform formatting, test priorities, and suggested pairings for comparison.
Review Google Ads extensions, the extra links and details shown with ads, across campaigns. Find missing coverage, weak performance, and outdated information, then get replacement copy based on successful ads and landing pages, plus rollout priorities.
Analyze spending, revenue, and conversions across advertising channels to recommend budget shifts. Compare overall efficiency with the revenue gained from additional spending, identify saturation, and produce a gradual reallocation plan with monitoring priorities.