'thinking' 검색 결과

Use when search or investigation could run forever. Set an explicit good-enough threshold first, then stop at the first option that clears it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Before committing to a plan or launch, assume it already failed and reason backward through concrete causes — convert failure paths into mitigations, gates, and stop checks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use under time pressure when the situation is still changing and you must act before certainty — cycle Observe→Orient→Decide→Act on ~70% confidence, then re-observe.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The Jobs-to-be-Done framework as applied product methodology. Job statements, struggling moments, hire and fire criteria, the difference between feature-thinking and job-thinking. Honest about where JTBD adds clarity (discovery, prioritization, positioning) and where it becomes performative ritual (job-statement workshops that do not drive decisions, persona-theater disguised as JTBD). Triggers on jobs-to-be-done, JTBD, job statements, struggling moments, hire criteria, fire criteria, switch triggers, functional emotional social jobs, outcome-driven innovation. Also triggers when a team is over-relying on feature-request lists or persona archetypes that do not drive product decisions, when a positioning conversation needs the framing JTBD provides, or when discovery is producing outputs that do not connect to product strategy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Universal MCP client for connecting to any MCP server with progressive disclosure. Wraps MCP servers as skills to avoid context window bloat from tool definitions. Use when interacting with external MCP servers (Zapier, Sequential Thinking, GitHub, filesystem, etc.), listing available tools, or executing MCP tool calls. Triggers on requests like "connect to Zapier", "use MCP server", "list MCP tools", "call Zapier action", "use sequential thinking", or any MCP server interaction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agnes AI API 接入支持与问题排查 Skill。帮助新用户完成 Agnes AI API 的接入配置， 诊断和解决接入过程中遇到的认证、参数、响应、图像生成、视频生成等各类问题。 涵盖 Thinking 模式开启、视频长度调节、流式输出、工具调用等高级功能指导。 兼容 OpenClaw、Claude Code、Hermes、Codex 等工具链。 thinking、stream、tool calling、模型选择、Base URL、响应格式、timeout、超时、轮询、 FAQ、问题排查、调试、免费调用、RPM、video_id、task_id、Prompt 模板、提示词、 生图、生视频、图生图、文生图、图生视频、文生视频、灰度自检、1M 上下文、4K 图片、4K 图、4K、灰度、自检、反馈、Bug、issue、问题反馈、功能建议。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Firebase gives you a complete backend in minutes - auth, database, storage, functions, hosting. But the ease of setup hides real complexity. Security rules are your last line of defense, and they're often wrong. Firestore queries are limited, and you learn this after you've designed your data model. This skill covers Firebase Authentication, Firestore, Realtime Database, Cloud Functions, Cloud Storage, and Firebase Hosting. Key insight: Firebase is optimized for read-heavy, denormalized data. If you're thinking relationally, you're thinking wrong. 2025 lesson: Firestore pricing can surprise you. Reads are cheap until they're not. A poorly designed listener can cost more than a dedicated database. Plan your data model for your query patterns, not your data relationships. Use when "firebase, firestore, firebase auth, cloud functions, firebase storage, realtime database, firebase hosting, firebase emulator, security rules, firebase admin, firebase, firestore, cloud-functions, serverless, backend, realtime, authentication, google-cloud" mentioned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Brainstorms and debates approaches, then drives toward an actionable decision. Use whenever someone needs a thinking partner for a decision they're facing: 'discuss', 'debate', 'brainstorm', 'weigh options', 'tradeoffs', 'should I do X or Y', 'help me decide', 'I'm torn between', 'sanity check my thinking', or 'what do you think about'. The user must be asking for help reasoning through a choice — not asking to build, fix, evaluate, plan, or modify something (even if the topic involves this skill itself). Picks the right decision lens, surfaces tradeoffs and blind spots, pushes back when reasoning is genuinely weak, and never implements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit the reasoning of a document or argument (memo, proposal, investment analysis, board paper, article, the user's own draft): claims, evidence, unstated assumptions, logical gaps, fallacies, and what would falsify it, each anchored to quoted text. Use whenever the user wants reasoning examined, in any language ("audit this argument", "is this analysis sound", "poke holes in this proposal", "review the logic of my draft"; Vietnamese "phản biện giúp tôi", "soi lập luận này", "tài liệu này có lỗ hổng gì", "góp ý bản nháp của tôi"), even when they never say "critical thinking". Also use when the user drops a document and asks whether to trust or act on it, or asks to see their reasoning profile. Not for company-level strategic bets (strategy-board) or learning a topic through dialogue (socratic-questor).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Master optimization protocol for Gemini Agent (Antigravity) to unlock native 2M+ to 10M+ long-context reasoning, Gemini 4 Pro & Gemini 4 Flash dynamic thinking budget control, native context caching, Multimodal Live API, and high-speed problem solving / Protokol optimasi utama untuk Gemini Agent (Antigravity) untuk mengaktifkan pemikiran long-context 2M+ hingga 10M+, kontrol thinking budget dinamis Gemini 4 Pro & Gemini 4 Flash, context caching native, Multimodal Live API, dan pemecahan masalah kecepatan tinggi.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Computational thinking as a problem-solving discipline independent of programming languages. Covers the four pillars (decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, algorithm design), computational problem-solving methodology (understand, decompose, generalize, formalize, verify), abstraction levels (from hardware through user interface), modeling and simulation, automata and formal languages (DFA, NFA, regular expressions, context-free grammars, Turing machines), computational complexity classes (P, NP, NP-complete, undecidable), and constructionist pedagogy (learning by building, Logo, Scratch, physical computing). Use when approaching unfamiliar problems, teaching problem-solving strategies, analyzing problem complexity, or bridging between domain knowledge and computational solutions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Three-dimensional art and sculptural thinking for art education. Covers additive and subtractive sculptural processes, armature construction, modeling in clay, carving principles, casting and moldmaking, assemblage and found-object sculpture, installation art as expanded sculpture, and the conceptual transition from pictorial to spatial thinking. Use when working with three-dimensional media, analyzing sculptural form, understanding spatial composition, or investigating the relationship between sculpture and site.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill for ANY financial market, investment, or macro-economic analysis. ALWAYS trigger this skill — do not skip it — when the user asks about: BTC, bitcoin, crypto, gold, silver, oil, stocks, forex, bonds, interest rates, Fed policy, inflation, deflation, stagflation, market structure, trading setups, portfolio allocation, asset allocation, investment strategy, price analysis, market outlook, geopolitics affecting markets, or any question involving "should I buy/sell/hold [any asset]", "what will [asset] do", or "analyze [market/asset]". Apply Genesis Protocol (First Principle + System Thinking) combined with SMC Layer analysis to produce structured insights with explicit scenarios, entry/exit zones, and uncertainty. For non-market strategic thinking, use genesis-mind-strategic-intelligence instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill for ANY financial market, investment, or macro-economic analysis. ALWAYS trigger this skill — do not skip it — when the user asks about: BTC, bitcoin, crypto, gold, silver, oil, stocks, forex, bonds, interest rates, Fed policy, inflation, deflation, stagflation, market structure, trading setups, portfolio allocation, asset allocation, investment strategy, price analysis, market outlook, geopolitics affecting markets, or any question involving "should I buy/sell/hold [any asset]", "what will [asset] do", or "analyze [market/asset]". Apply Genesis Protocol (First Principle + System Thinking) combined with SMC Layer analysis to produce structured insights with explicit scenarios, entry/exit zones, and uncertainty. For non-market strategic thinking, use genesis-mind-strategic-intelligence instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when Codex must make a high-quality judgment on any complex problem, not only technical problems. Trigger when a question has high complexity, uncertainty, cost of being wrong, long-term impact, value tradeoffs, possible structural causes, or when the user asks for 全面思考, 深度理解, 系统性分析, 帮我想清楚, 从根上看, 这件事到底怎么看, 方法论, 复杂问题拆解, 系统方案, 架构判断, 策略判断, or 根因分析. Also trigger for project and engineering high-risk scenarios such as multi-module, multi-environment, multi-data-source, multi-state, financial truth, live trading, ledger, revenue, customer assets, order governance, broker interfaces, online availability, major solution selection, and system closure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Self-critique specification documents using extended thinking — surfaces hidden assumptions, contradictions, missing edge cases, and scope creep before implementation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Sequential thinking and structured problem solving. Break down complex problems into steps with revision and branching capabilities. Use for multi-step analysis, planning, and hypothesis verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

当用户在反思自己的认知局限、质疑群体共识、或在问"如何独立思考""怎么判断自己是不是被洗脑了""为什么我总觉得自己是对的""怎么避免从众"时激活。 核心信号：用户在做"元认知"——审视自己的思维过程本身，或在群体压力下试图保持独立判断。 不适用于：需要快速决策的紧急情况、纯技术性问题、不需要反思的信息查询。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

当用户需要构建一个系统/理论/知识体系、寻找问题的底层原理、或在问"如何从根本原理出发推导一切""怎么找到事物的本质""为什么物理学/哲学思维有用"时激活。 核心信号：用户在做体系化思考、寻找"第一因"、或试图从少量前提推导出完整方案。 不适用于：纯粹的执行层面问题、不需要理论指导的实操任务。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Apply Bloom's revised taxonomy to classify learning objectives and design assessments across six cognitive levels. Use this skill when the user needs to write learning objectives at specific cognitive levels, align assessment with instructional goals, or evaluate curriculum for cognitive complexity distribution — even if they say 'how to write learning objectives', 'what level of thinking does this require', or 'higher-order thinking skills'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run structured product thinking exercises before writing a spec. Use this skill when: - You need to think through a feature idea before writing a PRD - You want to run the 11-star experience exercise for a feature - You need a positioning statement using Geoffrey Moore's framework - You want to define product principles and success vision for a new feature - You have a raw feature idea and need to turn it into a structured brief

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Coordinate structured thinking and multi-agent parallel execution for complex tasks. Use when tackling multi-step projects, planning parallel work, breaking down complex problems, coordinating specialist tasks, facing architectural decisions, or when user mentions "workflow", "orchestration", "multi-step", "coordinate", "parallel execution", "structured thinking", "break this down", "plan this out", "how should I approach", or needs help planning complex implementations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for strategic thinking, or when the user must choose a direction under constraints: "where should we focus?", "how do we win?", "roadmap for next year", "what should we not do?". Ends in explicit bets and risks. Skip for step-by-step implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.