1,469 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when deciding whether an anthropology project fits American Anthropologist (AA) and which section to target. AA is the four-field AAA flagship, so the test is significance across anthropology (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), not single-subfield novelty. Helps frame the question and pick a section; it does not collect data or conduct fieldwork.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AISTATS fit, comparing AISTATS with NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, UAI, COLT, JMLR, statistics journals, or application venues, identifying the statistical primitive of the contribution, and sharpening the AI-statistics framing before writing begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which aeri-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing work on a short-format manuscript from topic selection through the conditional-accept response for an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a macro paper fits the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) rather than AER, J. Monetary Economics, RED, or AEJ: Applied. Tests the broad-interest macro bar and venue fit; it does not write the paper or fix identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a microeconomics project fits the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) rather than JET, GEB, Theoretical Economics, Econometrica, or AEJ: Applied. Tests scope and broad-interest fit; it does not develop the model (see aejmic-theory-model).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Agricultural Systems (AgSy) via the current Elsevier submission path / Editorial Manager — article-type selection, abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract, CRediT and declaration-of-interest statements, funding/AI disclosures, reference style, and data/code/model availability. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a project fits Agricultural Systems (AgSy) and which article type to target. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the test is a genuine systems question — interactions among components, across hierarchical levels (field → farm → landscape → region → food system), trade-offs, and emergent behavior — analyzed with integrated modelling, NOT a single-factor field trial. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which aejmic-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a project is the ONE crisp, important, well-identified insight that an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) short-format manuscript requires, rather than a multi-result paper for AER or a field paper for the AEJ family. Tests single-insight fit; it does not run the analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which aejmac-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which asq-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether an applied-micro project belongs at the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) rather than AER, AEJ: Economic Policy, or a field journal, and what its central question should be. Sets venue fit and question scope; it does not design the identification (see aeja-identification).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which aeja-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing suggested and opposed referees for an Advanced Materials submission and pre-empting the objections materials reviewers most often raise. Plans referee selection and objection defense; does not write the manuscript or the rebuttal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a project fits AEJ: Economic Policy rather than J. Public Economics, AEJ: Applied, or AER, and when sharpening the policy question and its welfare stake for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Frames fit and the policy-question-first contribution; it does not design the identification or run estimation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when judging whether a research idea fits Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) and has the *surprising* theoretical insight ASQ demands. Sharpens the puzzle and the contribution claim; it does not design the study or write theory sections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which aejpol-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a project is a genuine ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) contribution rather than single-modality work, choosing a thematic area, and routing between ACM MM, CVPR/ICCV, ACL/EMNLP, ICMR, MMSys, NeurIPS/ICLR, and the ACM TOMM journal by finding the cross-modal or media-systems core of the contribution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 判断选题是否对口、定位到合适栏目/学科方向时使用。覆盖本刊电子科学与技术、信息与通信工程、信号与信息处理、电路与系统、电磁场与微波、集成电路等学科侧重，如何评估选题的创新性与本刊契合度、区别于计算机类与控制类兄弟刊、判断投中文《电子学报》还是英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics、以及原创论文与综述的定位差异。帮助作者在动笔前就把选题放进《电子学报》的正确坐标，避免因不对口在初审被退。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 确定选题、判断稿件是否契合本刊控制与自动化学科定位、以及在综述/论文/短文三类栏目间定位时调用。帮助辨析本刊与兄弟中文刊(计算机学报/软件学报/电子学报/计算机研究与发展/计算机科学)的学科分工，评估创新性与贡献可数性，避免"主题超范围""无新意""重复前人"等初审退稿理由，并把选题打磨到匹配 Acta Automatica Sinica 的控制/模式识别/机器人/智能系统侧重与中英文双语综述长文传统。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a security project fits ACM CCS versus IEEE S&P, USENIX Security, NDSS, PETS, or a crypto/theory venue, identifying the security contribution type, and sharpening the threat model and attacker capability before writing begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which aos-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a project fits ACL versus EMNLP, NAACL, EACL, TACL, Computational Linguistics, COLM, or an ML venue, covering contribution typing for NLP work, long-versus-short paper choice, the annual theme track, Findings-tier expectations, and sharpening the computational-linguistics framing before writing starts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — testing whether the question genuinely concerns the social, organizational, behavioral or institutional life of accounting, and picking the intellectual tradition the question demands. Screens fit; it does not build the theory (aos-theory-development).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。