「decide」の検索結果

Define clear decision rights - Decider, Approver, Veto, Consulted, Informed. Use when clarifying who decides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as a product-manager copilot that turns evidence into product decisions and artifacts: backlogs and prioritization, PRDs and user stories, metrics and OKRs, experiments, launch plans, feedback triage, and pricing/packaging, kept in a per-product workspace. Use whenever the user wants to decide what to build, spec it, or ship it: "write a PRD for…", "prioritize our backlog", "what should we build next", "plan OKRs", "define our north star metric", "design an A/B test", "plan the launch", "triage this customer feedback", "platform or feature?", in any language ("viết PRD", "ưu tiên tính năng nào", "quản lý sản phẩm", "プロダクト管理", "产品经理"), even when they never say "product manager". Also use when the user returns to a product workspace this skill created (a directory holding `product.md`, `state.md`, and `decisions.md`). Not for deep user discovery (design-thinking), desk market facts (market-researcher), or company-level bets (strategy-board).

Assemble cases from context, induce the widest sound rule. Use when a real case shows a class no rule yet decides, or a rule decides only the cases it came from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DECIDE-phase doctrine for an Arbor research run: when to merge, prune, combine, or finalize; how the held-out merge gate works; and the rule that the final report uses TEST scores. Load before deciding what to do with completed experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review a reusable skill (SKILL.md) that packages a workflow, and decide whether the request should be a skill instead of a prompt, instruction, agent, or hook. Use when creating a new skill, extracting a workflow from a conversation, updating an existing skill, reviewing SKILL.md quality, or fixing weak skill triggering. Triggers on "create skill", "/create-skill", "new skill", "review skill", "fix skill trigger", "SKILL.md", "スキル作成".

Design, review, and debug agent workflows, and decide when a request should use a prompt, instruction, skill, agent, or hook before escalating to multi-agent design. Use for .agent.md / .instructions.md / .prompt.md / AGENTS.md work, workflow architecture, orchestration planning, scheduled automation model allocation, or when agent workflows may be overkill. Triggers on 'agent workflow', 'create agent', 'automation models', 'ワークフロー設計', 'orchestrator'.

Comprehensive social media operations for B2B SaaS brand building and engagement. Use this skill to develop LinkedIn strategy, decide whether to run a LinkedIn newsletter and how to scope it, capture consented registrations from LinkedIn Events, check LinkedIn Live eligibility, manage Twitter/X presence, create YouTube content, engage on Reddit communities, decide whether and how to answer on Quora, build community, develop influencer and creator partnerships, vet a creator before paying them, start or fix a B2B podcast, book podcast guests and guest appearances, judge whether a podcast is worth appearing on when you cannot audit its numbers, write show notes and transcripts, run social listening (what are people saying about us, share of voice, brand monitoring, validated sentiment, alert thresholds, routing signals to the right owner), and execute organic social campaigns. Also triggers on: LinkedIn, LinkedIn newsletter, LinkedIn Events, LinkedIn Live, event registration form, subscribe to our newsletter on LinkedIn, marketing consent checkbox, Notify Employees, Twitter/X, YouTube, Reddit, community, influencer, creator partnerships, influencer vetting, engagement rate, fake followers, engagement pods, FTC disclosure, sponsored post disclosure, media kit, social media strategy, organic social, employee advocacy, podcast, podcast strategy, podcast guesting, how do I know if this podcast has real listeners, the host says they get 50k downloads, is this podcast worth going on, podcast RSS feed research, IAB podcast measurement certification, Listen Score, Apple Podcasts reviews, show notes, audiogram, episode transcript, social media account access, who has admin on our LinkedIn page, the person who ran our social accounts left, locked out of our company account, social media offboarding, YouTube channel owner, Slack primary owner, social account MFA, social media approval workflow, pause all scheduled posts, social listening, what are people saying about us, brand monitoring, brand mentions, share of voice, social share of voice vs competitors, sentiment analysis, is our sentiment dashboard accurate, listening query, boolean query, mention alerts, spike alert, CrowdTangle replacement, Reddit API access, which platforms can our listening tool see, someone on Reddit asked for a tool like ours, comment mining, voice of customer from social.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the production code that makes a pre-decided set of failing tests pass, within an explicit write_set, following an explicit behavior contract. Used by `/tdd` Step 3 and by `/swarm-dispatch` workers. The caller has already decided architecture, naming, file layout, and abstraction boundaries — this skill executes that recipe with code-structure discipline and a 5-iteration RALPH loop. No scope expansion, no design decisions, no test edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a GitHub issue that already has the cc-issue-created label and is assumed to be ready to start. First inspect the comment history to decide whether human confirmation is needed (cc-need-human-check, highest priority); otherwise decide whether the issue should be closed as not needed, unanswered confirmation items remain (cc-answer-issue-questions), the description is stale relative to settled comment-history content and must be refreshed before execution (cc-update-issue), or it can move to execution (cc-exec-issue). Dependency checks are out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extrem kurzes, substantielles Ausgabe-FORMAT fuer EINE Entscheidung oder Entscheidungsgruppe, wenn die dahinterstehende Analyse bereits existiert (im Chat entstanden, aus `decide`, aus `decision-briefing`, aus einem Ticket oder Dokument): Kontext in 2-3 Zeilen, Pro/Contra je Option als Stichpunkte im paveman/caveman-reduzierten Stil, Talking Points, eine begruendete Empfehlung, und ein Pfad/Link zur Vollanalyse zum Komplett-Nachlesen. Nutze diesen Skill bei "gib mir das kurz mit Pro Contra und Empfehlung", "executive summary zur Entscheidung", "kurzkontext zu <Thema>", "fass die Entscheidung X in einer Kurzform zusammen", /decision-shot, oder wenn ein Ergebnis an jemanden weitergereicht werden soll, der nur die Essenz braucht, nicht die volle Herleitung. NICHT nutzen, um viele offene Entscheidungen zu SAMMELN und per Buchstabe abzufragen -- das macht decision-briefing; NICHT nutzen, um eine Entscheidung erst zu ANALYSIEREN -- das macht decide. decision-shot setzt eine fertige Analyse voraus und komprimiert nur deren Praesentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debrief a finished Otameshi Tenshoku trial from the employer's side: set the observed facts against the completion criteria agreed before the start, keep expectations added afterwards, second-hand or off-the-job observations and the company's own late or missing support apart, settle the hours actually worked separately from any evaluation, and draft feedback to the candidate that states facts, support gaps and what happens next without promising a hire or continuation the company has not decided. Use when a hiring manager, recruiter or small-business owner wants to review a trial, decide what to tell the candidate, or work out the settlement after a shortfall; do not use to judge the candidate's aptitude or predict a hire, to cut pay or demand unpaid rework because of dissatisfaction, to compare candidates, or to send the feedback, pay, or update records on the user's behalf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lay out how a job search will actually run alongside a current job: the hours available each week and what they go to, how weekday daytime slots for interviews will be found, which routes to use (direct applications, job boards, scout sites, agents, referrals, public employment services) and what each one discloses to whom, how to keep the search from reaching the current employer through public profiles or workplace equipment, a single tracker of every application's stage, next action, and deadline, and a date and conditions for reviewing, reducing, or pausing the search. Use when someone has decided to start looking, or to gather information while employed, and asks how to fit it in, which routes to use, whether the applications they are running fit the time they have, or how to keep track of them; do not use to decide whether to change jobs, to pick or rate employers or job postings, to predict outcomes, or to send applications, publish profiles, or contact agents on the user's behalf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes memory and retrieval tasks between MemPalace and QMD. Use this skill whenever the user asks WHERE something is in the codebase (route to QMD), WHY something was built a certain way or what was decided (route to MemPalace), or needs BOTH code and historical context (combined). Trigger on phrases like: 'where is X', 'find X in the code', 'search the codebase for X', 'what did we decide about X', 'why does X work this way', 'show me X and why we built it', 'look up X', 'what's in the handoffs about X', 'pull the relevant files for X'. Use proactively whenever a question could benefit from codebase search OR project memory — don't wait for the user to explicitly ask for a search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Boyd's OODA loop to navigate fast-moving, uncertain, or competitive situations — Observe what is actually happening, Orient through mental models and context, Decide on the clearest path, Act quickly, then loop again. Load when the situation is changing faster than the current plan, when a competitive response is needed, when the user is stuck in analysis paralysis in a dynamic environment, when shipping under uncertainty, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a fast-moving / competitive frame. Triggers on "what should we do right now", "the situation is changing", "how do we respond to this", "competitive response", "we need to move fast", or "we're stuck deciding". Based on John Boyd's OODA loop — Observe, Orient, Decide, Act — adapted for product and business contexts (OODA Canvas 2026).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DiscordにつながるOpenClawのエージェントやセッションへ質問を送り、送信先を確認したうえで、セッション側の判断に任せる投稿や明示指定の投稿を扱います。

• Discord側のエージェントに質問したいとき
• 送信前に宛先を確認したいとき
• 投稿の判断をセッションに任せたいとき

実装完了後に全テストを確認し、ローカルでのマージ、Pull Request作成、現状維持を選んで進めます。選択と作業環境に応じてブランチや作業領域を整理します。

• 完成した機能をローカルでマージする
• ブランチをpushしてPRを作る
• 完成した変更を後で統合したいとき

呼び出し側が覚える使い方を小さく保ち、複雑な処理を内部にまとめる設計を支援します。共通の用語と判断基準で、モジュールの使いやすさやテストのしやすさを検討するスキルです。

• モジュールの使い方を簡単にしたいとき
• 散らばった複雑な処理をまとめたいとき
• 実装を差し替える場所の検討

一度の対話では収まらない大きな企画や変更を、決めるべき問いと依存関係に整理します。課題管理ツールに判断の記録を残し、実行に移るまでの道筋を明らかにするスキル。

• 複数の対話にまたがる大きな計画
• 未決事項と依存関係の整理
• 共同作業で判断の経緯を共有

GitHubやLinear、ローカルの通知を棚卸しし、重要度と担当者に応じた届け先を設計します。重複や不要な通知を整理し、次の対応が分かる運用にまとめるスキル。

• 複数ツールの通知をまとめたいとき
• CI失敗の重複通知を減らしたいとき
• 緊急通知とまとめ通知の振り分け

新しい機能を実装する前に、既存コードやnpm・PyPIのパッケージ、MCP serversなどを調べます。候補を比較し、採用・拡張・自作の判断につなげるスキルです。

• 機能追加前に既存の解決策を調べたいとき
• 依存パッケージの導入前の比較
• 外部連携に使えるツールの調査

Reactの画面部品やフックを、利用者の操作と表示結果に沿ってテストします。通信の模擬やアクセシビリティ確認、実ブラウザーで検証する範囲の判断も支援します。

• Reactのフォームや部品のテスト追加
• 独自フックと非同期更新の検証
• APIの成功・失敗応答を模擬したいとき

自社の強みや顧客像を基に、比較すべき競合と調査先を選びます。直接競合・周辺競合・目標となる企業に分類し、根拠付きの候補一覧を作って詳しい比較の準備を整えます。

• 競合比較の対象を決めたいとき
• 直接競合・周辺競合・目標企業の分類
• 市場調査レポートの候補を絞りたいとき

採点済みの競合情報を、市場マップや比較表、差別化の余地、優先施策を含むレポートにまとめます。経営層への報告や、チームで競争方針を決める場面に役立ちます。

• 経営層や取締役会向けの競合報告
• 完成済み競合プロフィールの統合
• 差別化の余地と競合脅威の検討