「esi」の検索結果

Use when a task needs the judgment of a biomedical/bioengineering engineer — running a design control phase (inputs, outputs, verification, validation) for a medical device, scoring a Design FMEA and deciding whether a failure mode needs mitigation, planning a human factors/usability validation study, building a design traceability matrix, or writing a design verification or risk-mitigation report. Distinct from a regulatory-affairs-specialist (owns the submission/clearance process, not the engineering itself) and from a clinical-data-manager/biostatistician (trial data and analysis, not device design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Certified Anesthesiologist Assistant (CAA) working inside an Anesthesia Care Team — building and executing an intraoperative anesthetic plan under a directing anesthesiologist, reading a vital-sign trend for anesthesia-specific emergencies (malignant hyperthermia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, awareness), deciding when a deviation is an immediate-escalation trigger versus an independently correctable event, or navigating the jurisdiction/concurrency limits of CAA practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates accurate frontend implementations from visual references while maintaining design consistency. Use when user provides Figma URLs, screenshots, design images, requests visual implementation from reference, or asks to build UI matching a design. Automatically checks existing design intent patterns before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Xilinx/AMD Vivado FPGA build workflow -- batch-mode TCL scripting, ADI HDL reference design integration, Zynq-7000/MPSoC block design, IP builds, synthesis, implementation, and bitstream generation. Use for any Zynq or UltraScale+ design that incorporates ADI transceivers or follows the ADI HDL reference design pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a data pipeline design document. Use when the user says "pipeline design doc", "document this pipeline", "pipeline architecture doc", "data flow document", "how does this pipeline work", "design doc for ETL", "pipeline spec", or needs to capture the architecture, data flow, and operational details of a data pipeline - even if they don't explicitly say "design doc".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ハンズオンで作った動くアプリを「商品として売り出す」視点で見直し、ペライチのランディングページ（LP）を作る対話スキル。動くアプリを実際に触りながらコピーを練り、最後に frontend-design スキルを自動で呼び出して HTML 実物まで一気に着地させる。標準構成では /verify-project の後に本線として実施する（30〜50分）。/landing-page-design で明示起動。

Cartesia text-to-speech: synthesize speech audio and browse voices. Trigger phrases: cartesia, text to speech, TTS, synthesize voice, voiceover.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with Canva designs: list designs and folders, create designs, upload assets, and export to PNG/JPG/PDF/MP4. Trigger phrases: canva, canva design, export canva design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requirements for a Salesforce Enterprise Territory Management (ETM) territory design: alignment criteria, coverage model selection, assignment rule logic, hierarchy depth and breadth, and user-to-territory ratios. Trigger keywords: territory design, territory alignment, territory model requirements, sales coverage model, territory criteria, geographic territory, named account territory, overlay territory. NOT for ETM setup steps — use admin/enterprise-territory-management. NOT for loading territory assignment data — use data/territory-data-alignment. Trigger keywords: territory design questionnaire, territory requirements document, assignment rule matrix, territory type priority, realignment plan, territory access level decision, accountAccessLevel, opportunityAccessLevel, ObjectTerritory2Association, UserTerritory2Association, Planning state model, territory acceptance tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when designing the UX and content strategy for a Salesforce-powered self-service portal or help center — pre-deflection article surfacing, Help Center search UX, friction-calibrated case submission forms, community peer support layers, and deflection measurement. Trigger keywords: design self-service portal, case deflection strategy, help center UX design, reduce support volume with self-service, knowledge base search experience. NOT for picking which contact reasons to deflect and through which channel — use architect/case-deflection-strategy. NOT for building the Experience Cloud site itself — use admin/experience-cloud-site-setup. More trigger keywords: article visibility matrix IsVisibleInCsp IsVisibleInPkb, which articles show in the customer portal, case visibility for portal users, CaseComment IsPublished customer visible comment, self-registration profile and account for a portal, Help Center template does not support login, deflection metrics SOQL KnowledgeArticleViewStat, self-service journey map, moderation policy for a support community.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when defining or refining the tone, voice, and behavioral personality of an Agentforce agent: system instruction encoding, brand voice alignment, adaptive response formats, multi-persona strategies. NOT for writing the actual conversational copy — utterances, fallback messages, escalation phrasing — use admin/agent-conversation-design. NOT for topic scope design — use agentforce/agent-topic-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating a new Salesforce custom object: naming the object and setting its API name, selecting optional features (Activities, Chatter, History Tracking), choosing an org-wide default sharing model, and creating a tab. Triggers: 'create a custom object', 'new custom object setup', 'what sharing model should I choose', 'how do I create a tab for my object', 'object features like activities and history tracking'. NOT for designing the fields on the object - use admin/custom-field-creation. NOT for sharing rules or role hierarchy configuration - use admin/sharing-and-visibility. NOT for lookup-vs-master-detail and junction design - use data/data-model-design-patterns. More triggers: 'custom object records not showing in search', 'sharing model greyed out on my object', 'auto number restarted at 1 after deploy', 'cannot create a queue for my custom object', 'CustomObject deploy failed enableBulkApi', 'field history tracking shows no rows'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or customizing industry-specific guided processes in Salesforce Industries clouds: insurance claims lifecycle (FNOL through closure), telecom order management decomposition, and utility service request workflows. Trigger keywords: FNOL process design, claims OmniScript customization, Industries order decomposition workflow, utility service order design, insurance claim lifecycle stages, telecom commercial-to-technical order flow. NOT for the Industries object model — use architect/industries-data-model. NOT for Insurance Cloud licensing and policy architecture — use architect/insurance-cloud-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specify a FlexCard before a developer opens Card Designer: the card-state set and the condition that selects each state, the data source type behind each card (DataRaptor, Integration Procedure, Apex remote, SOQL), the action menu users get (navigate, launch OmniScript, Apex, DataRaptor), and every embedded child FlexCard or custom LWC. Produces the artifacts a BA hands to the builder. Trigger keywords: FlexCard requirements, FlexCard BA, FlexCard layout design, FlexCard data sources, FlexCard actions, FlexCard card states, OmniStudio FlexCard scoping. NOT for building the card in Card Designer, NOT for OmniScript step and branching requirements (use admin/omniscript-flow-design-requirements), NOT for standard Lightning record-page component requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, mock up, build and review terminal UIs — full-screen TUIs, interactive CLIs and pickers, and plugin panels or popups inside a host (herdr, tmux, Neovim, k9s, lazygit). Use when designing, reviewing (from code, a live capture or a screenshot) or redesigning a TUI's layout, keybindings, states or colors, including requests that name a known TUI (lazygit, k9s, btop, yazi, helix, fzf); writing terminal mockups; building or fixing one in Ink, Textual, Bubble Tea, Ratatui or gum; mapping a color scheme (Catppuccin, Dracula, Nord, Gruvbox, Tokyo Night, Rosé Pine…) onto a TUI's theme; fixing misaligned glyphs, flicker, NO_COLOR, exit codes, signals, pipes or a broken terminal after exit; suspend or $EDITOR handoff; or profiling a slow TUI. Not for web or native GUIs, terminal-emulator, editor or shell-prompt themes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and refine websites, slides, prototypes, and design systems through the local OpenDesign MCP. Use OpenDesign Cloud by default, or Local Codex and secure BYOK only when the user explicitly selects them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mechanical consistency check for game design — answers "is the design consistent with itself?" — plus changed-scope impact analysis across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Offline and deterministic: greps the facts registry against the documents (numbers, terms, IDs, duplicate & dangling references, roster↔disk, map freshness, Depends 3-way, status/version, AC presence, placeholder leaks, flow & content schema), and from a git diff computes which dependent systems, flows, and content a change affects. Scope is inferred: a named document checks that document; an unverified diff triggers a changed-scope pass; otherwise everything. Use when the user wants a consistency or impact check, e.g. "verify the design", "what did this change affect", "find broken references in the design". Conflicts triage into four tracks; the entailed fixes hand off to /unikit-gd-apply in one pass. This is the mechanical pass — for a subjective "is this design good" quality critique use /unikit-gd-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cold-start brownfield reconnaissance — reconstruct the WHOLE game design from an existing codebase when there is no GDD yet. Optionally accepts a free-text game description, notes, or reference links to guide and enrich the scan. Use when the user wants to build the game design from the code, e.g. "create a GDD from this codebase", "reconstruct the design from our code — it's a roguelike deck-builder", "build a design doc from the existing project, here are some refs". Scans the project (engine auto-detected), extracts a system roster + dependency graph and content-type schemas / resources / entities into one passive .unikit/gamedesign/RECON.md, tags every fact provenance:extracted-from-code, and writes a mandatory Intent Gap for what code cannot know (pillars, fantasy, the "why"). Writes nothing else and calls no skill. STRICTLY whole-project cold-start — if a GDD already exists and the user wants a specific part investigated, use /unikit-gd-explore (code lens); to author the GDD use /unikit-gd-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and ideation partner for GAME DESIGN — think through design ideas before writing them into the GDD; produces a brief, never edits the GDD itself. Use to assess a genre or market for viability, dissect a reference game (mechanics → dynamics → aesthetics), explore how to improve or extend an existing system, flow, or content type, research new mechanics the design lacks, investigate a part of the GDD in code, or develop the research bucket of a /unikit-gd-review report into decided edits. Trigger on "explore how to improve the flow", "ways to improve the combat system", "is this genre saturated", "break down the combat of Hades", "work out the review's open questions". GAME-DESIGN research only — for CODE or technical research use /unikit-explore; to reconstruct a design from code use /unikit-gd-recon; to write a change into the GDD use /unikit-gd-system or /unikit-gd-spec; to apply edits you know use /unikit-gd-apply; to invent a new game use /unikit-gd-brainstorm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses. Operationalizes Richards Heuer's CIA-tradition technique for systematically narrowing among multiple hypotheses against evidence. Builds an explicit hypothesis-vs-evidence matrix and focuses on disconfirmation rather than confirmation — the central insight: hypotheses cannot be proven, only disconfirmed; the surviving hypothesis is the one with the least disconfirming evidence. Spawns parallel hypothesizers (in isolation, across hypothesis-generation angles) and parallel evidence-gatherers (across evidence classes), then synthesizes into a matrix, diagnosticity analysis, sensitivity analysis, and falsification milestones. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite frontend design taste for building, reviewing, and polishing web interfaces. Use whenever the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, or improve any UI (landing pages, portfolios, dashboards, product UI, components, forms, onboarding, empty states) or asks to make something look better / premium / modern, fix the styling, add or fix animations, or make a design feel less generic ("AI slop"). Covers typography, color, spacing, layout, visual hierarchy, motion, micro-interactions, component states, accessibility, responsive behavior, UX copy, and anti-pattern detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and evolve design systems with design tokens, component architecture, accessibility guidelines, and documentation templates. Ensures consistent, scalable, and accessible UI across products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。