「mode」の検索結果

Walks a user through connecting the judge models this plugin can use — Codex, OpenCode, OpenRouter (or any compatible endpoint: 9router, z.ai, Moonshot), Gemini — and through picking models, including "research current models for me". Use for "multi setup", "set up multi", "configure judges/reviewers/ backends", "connect 9router", "change/pick models", "onboarding", or whenever a probe shows missing backends and the user needs to know what to do about it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Divergent ideation across model families — the same brainstorm, but each cognitive frame is handed to a different model (Claude sub-agent, OpenAI Codex, a cheap third via OpenCode) so the ideas diverge by frame and by model priors at once. Use for open design questions, architecture and API shape, naming, schema choices, fuzzy bugs with no known root cause, or on "multi adhd", "brainstorm with everyone", "wide ideas from all models". Skip for lookups, syntax, and anything phrased as "quick", "standard" or "canonical".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before designing, training, or auditing ANY model that replicates human-annotated labels, audit the annotation protocol's INPUT — the exact document/evidence the human labelers consulted — and give the model that same input. Use when: (1) designing a classifier/LLM extractor whose target is a hand-coded label set, (2) a label-replication model shows low recall concentrated in a label subset and the diagnosis on offer is "the label's information is not in the features", (3) reviewers propose construct splits (e.g. "designation vs record-evident"), adjudication sittings, or per-domain stop rules to explain residual disagreement with gold, (4) validating an extraction pipeline against labels transcribed from a source document. Symptom of the underlying failure: elaborate theory accumulates to explain why gold is "partially unpredictable" when the model was simply never shown the document the annotators read.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Domain-Driven Design architecture and implementation. Use when designing complex business systems, defining bounded contexts, structuring domain models, choosing between modular monolith vs microservices, implementing aggregates/entities/value objects, or when users mention "DDD", "domain-driven design", "bounded context", "aggregate", "domain model", "ubiquitous language", "event storming", "context mapping", "domain events", "anemic domain model", strategic design, tactical patterns, or domain modeling. Helps make architectural decisions, identify subdomains, design aggregates, and avoid common DDD pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze consumer modeling systems for purchase prediction, lifetime value estimation, multi-touch attribution, brand affinity, and switching cost analysis. Triggers: 'evaluate CLV model', 'review purchase prediction', 'audit attribution model', 'assess customer lifetime value'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze catastrophe modeling systems for natural disaster exposure, PML estimation, and reinsurance optimization. Use when: 'assess cat model', 'evaluate disaster exposure', 'review PML calculations', 'audit reinsurance program', 'check exposure data quality', 'analyze hurricane/earthquake risk models', 'evaluate Oasis or RMS setup'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Silently restructures the user's natural-language prompt into the format the model CURRENTLY running this skill handles best, then answers. On activation it identifies which model family is executing it (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen, Grok, Perplexity, Kimi, GLM, Command, Nova, or Phi) and loads that one model's official strategy — so the optimization always matches the model that actually runs it. Activate with /prompt-refine. Use when users want better answers without learning prompt engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing between Salesforce record-access mechanisms or reviewing the access model end to end. Trigger keywords: OWD, org-wide defaults, sharingModel, externalSharingModel, record access model, sharing architecture, which sharing mechanism, UserRecordAccess, __Share, RowCause, why can user see too much. NOT for sharing rules - use admin/sharing-rules. NOT for role hierarchy - use admin/role-hierarchy-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when building, reviewing, or refreshing a RACI (Responsible / Accountable / Consulted / Informed) matrix for a Salesforce project so that every Salesforce-specific decision — data model change, automation tier choice, security model, integration boundary, deployment, license/edition — has exactly one accountable owner and a documented escalation path that downstream agents can route to. Trigger keywords: RACI matrix salesforce project, stakeholder authority salesforce, escalation path salesforce decisions, who approves data model change, salesforce decision rights, REFUSAL_NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW routing. NOT for the change advisory board operating model itself (use admin/change-management-and-deployment). NOT for end-user training rollout plans (use admin/change-management-and-training). NOT for the technical mechanics of permission set assignment authority (use admin/permission-set-architecture). NOT for pure stakeholder requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). More trigger keywords: who approves a sandbox refresh, who signs off a data load, release update activation owner, delegated admin authority vs RACI, multi-org decision rights, escalation time-box.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The model-generator shape for Skmtc: one definition per component schema, built by copying the shipped SKELETON package and filling its SLOT markers with the target library's syntax. Covers the edge cases every model generator must survive — refs, recursion, optional vs nullable, additionalProperties, enums, readOnly/writeOnly. Use when authoring or editing a generator that maps schemas to a validator/schema/type library ("write a gen-<lib>", "map OpenAPI models to <lib>"). Load ALONGSIDE skmtc-generator (engine rules) and skmtc-lang-typescript (TS layer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use cheap, TEE-verified AI models from the 0G Compute Network as OpenClaw providers. Discover available models and compare pricing vs OpenRouter, verify provider integrity via hardware attestation (Intel TDX), manage your 0G wallet and sub-accounts, and configure models in OpenClaw with one workflow. Supports DeepSeek, GLM-5, Qwen, and other models available on the 0G marketplace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when refining a draft user prompt before sending it to a coding agent. Decomposes goal/context/constraints/acceptance/output-format, detects ambiguity and model-coupled framing, then emits a model-agnostic rewrite. Supports --analyze, --score, and --deep. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming), plans/reviews (mk:elicit), implementation plans (mk:plan-creator), or general codebase scouting (mk:scout).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Star schema, snowflake schema, SCD types, and Kimball methodology for analytical data modeling. Activate on: dimensional model, star schema, snowflake schema, SCD, fact table, dimension table, Kimball, grain, surrogate key. NOT for: dbt implementation (use dbt-analytics-engineer), warehouse tuning (use data-warehouse-optimizer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks cumulative LLM costs across DAG execution and makes real-time decisions to stay within budget. Downgrades models, skips optional nodes, or stops early when cost exceeds thresholds. Use when managing execution budgets, analyzing cost breakdowns, or optimizing model routing for cost. Activate on "cost budget", "too expensive", "reduce cost", "cost optimization", "model downgrade", "budget exceeded". NOT for LLM model selection logic (use llm-router), pricing comparisons across providers, or billing/invoicing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call germline SNPs and indels with GATK HaplotypeCaller and the GVCF joint-genotyping workflow. Covers the local-reassembly + PairHMM mechanism (why HC beats pileup callers on indels), the -ERC GVCF reference-confidence model and <NON_REF> allele, BQSR-vs-DRAGSTR and --dragen-mode error modeling, allele-specific (AS_) annotations, and edge cases (ploidy, Mutect2 mitochondria mode, sex chromosomes/PAR, contamination gating). Use when deciding whether to use HaplotypeCaller vs a pileup or DRAGEN caller, whether BQSR still earns its place, whether to call per-sample GVCFs for a cohort, or how to handle non-diploid, mitochondrial, sex-chromosome, or contaminated samples. Not for post-calling filtering depth (see variant-calling/filtering-best-practices) or cohort joint-genotyping scaling (see variant-calling/joint-calling).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and analyzes in vivo CRISPR screens in animal tumor models, organoids, and immune-cell adoptive transfers. Covers bottleneck math (250x cells/sgRNA requires ~25M cells implanted; impossible for most syngeneic models, forcing focused libraries), focused library design (Manguso 2017 Nature 547:413 immune screen; Chen 2015 tumor screens), CRISPR-StAR intrinsic-control screening (Uijttewaal 2025 Nat Biotechnol 43:1848), clonal-dynamics-limited detection, tumor-explant DNA recovery, syngeneic vs xenograft vs PDX considerations, and the relationship to downstream MAGeCK / drugZ analysis. Use when designing in vivo CRISPR screens for tumor / immune / metastasis biology, choosing focused vs genome-wide for animal models, addressing bottleneck-induced clonal collapse, picking the syngeneic / xenograft / PDX model, integrating in vivo with in vitro results, or applying CRISPR-StAR for animal experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predict RBP binding from RNA sequence using deep learning models (RBPNet sequence-to-signal, RNAProt RNN, GraphProt2 GCN with structure, DeepCLIP, DeepRiPe multi-modal CNN) for variant-effect prediction, in silico binding-site discovery, model interpretation, and transfer learning from CLIP and RBNS datasets. Use when computational prediction of RBP binding from sequence is needed, evaluating variant effects on binding without further wet-lab experiments, comparing model performance, or training a custom model on ENCODE eCLIP data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA 纯验收（只测不修）：Mode A 完整验收（test-spec → 10 维度断言引擎 → 报告 + User Gate）；Mode B 供 forge-bugfix P6 调用做单 bug 回归并回填 BF 报告。 铁律：每个测试必须有 pass/fail 和深层断言；console.error 零容忍；不猜端口，只用传入的 app_url。 触发方式：Mode A 用户说"测试"、"QA"、"forge-qa"或 forge-dev 调度；Mode B 由 forge-bugfix P6 调用（传 review_doc）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rastreie experimentos de ML, gerencie registro de modelos com versionamento, implante modelos em produção e reproduza experimentos com MLflow - plataforma agnóstica a frameworks para ciclo de vida de ML

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modelo de espaço de estados com complexidade O(n) versus O(n²) dos Transformers. Inferência 5× mais rápida, sequências de milhão de tokens, sem cache KV. SSM seletivo com design aware de hardware. Mamba-1 (d_state=16) e Mamba-2 (d_state=128, multi-head). Modelos 130M-2.8B no HuggingFace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Avalia modelos de geração de código em HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E e 15+ benchmarks com métricas pass@k. Use ao comparar modelos de código, avaliar capacidades de codificação, testar suporte multilíngue ou medir qualidade de geração de código. Padrão da indústria do BigCode Project usado pelos leaderboards do HuggingFace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduza o tamanho de LLMs e acelere a inferência usando técnicas de pruning como Wanda e SparseGPT. Use para comprimir modelos sem retreinamento, alcançando 50% de esparsidade com perda mínima de acurácia, ou ativando inferência mais rápida em aceleradores de hardware. Cobre pruning não estruturado, pruning estruturado, esparsidade N:M, pruning por magnitude e métodos one-shot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continuous environmental scanning across six PESTEL categories — Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal. Not a one-time analysis but an ongoing radar. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full scan and prioritises forces by impact, speed, and reversibility. Review mode checks the watch list monthly for movement and new signals. Alert mode defines concrete monitoring triggers for each top force. Use whenever someone wants to understand external forces acting on their business, assess macro risk, prepare for planning, or check whether the world has moved since last time they looked. Connects to the strategy map (forces act on the chain) and Wardley Map (forces drive component evolution). Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。