「codex review」の検索結果

ARS-Codex research, writing, manuscript review, study screening, and experiments. Use for deep research, literature or systematic reviews, meta-analysis, research questions, drafts, revisions, roadmaps, abstracts, citations, integrity checks, peer review, research-to-paper. Screen records: sr-screener. Citation triggers: check citations, look over the refs, 檢查引用, 檢查參考文獻, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사. Korean: 논문 심사, 논문 수정, 초록 작성, 체계적 문헌고찰, 연구부터 논문까지. Español: revisión de literatura, revisar artículo, enmendar mi artículo, escribir resumen, investigación a artículo. Also use for ARS aliases: /ars-plan, /ars-outline, /ars-abstract, /ars-lit-review, /ars-citation-check, /ars-disclosure, /ars-format-convert, /ars-3w, /ars-revision-coach, /ars-revision, /ars-reviewer, /ars-mark-read, /ars-unmark-read, /ars-cache-invalidate, /ars-rebuttal-audit, /ars-full. Prompts, references, templates, and contracts live under ars/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger: reviewer transport, advisory transport, review adapter, lens prompt/schema, OpenCode reviewer plugin, Codex reviewer, ReviewProviderContract. Enforce the shared Go advisory reviewer transport contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gets independent code reviews from Codex or Antigravity for uncommitted changes, branch diffs, and commits. Use when the user requests an external review, a second opinion on code, a codex review, a gemini review, an antigravity review, or /second-opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the local Codex CLI as an independent second agent. Two branches — (1) proactively run `codex review` for a second opinion after completing a substantive change, before presenting it as done or committing; (2) delegate a well-defined implementation task via `codex exec`, ONLY when the user explicitly asks for Codex to do it. Also covers how to prompt Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility entry point for opening and operating Codex Slides in Codex's in-editor Browser, including scenario selection, Design Files, brand systems, decks, and Play mode. Use when the user asks to open, launch, preview, view, play, inspect, or directly manipulate Codex Slides or a deck without leaving Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Contract intelligence and contract operations workflow skill for Claude and Codex. Guides the full contract lifecycle review process from intake and playbook normalization through clause review, deviation scoring, negotiation planning, approval routing, QA, and action recommendations. Reviews legal, business, operational, compliance, privacy, security, technology, and AI-related risks across contracts and legal documents. Supports NDAs, SaaS agreements, DPAs, procurement contracts, commercial agreements, contract comparisons, redlines, approval packages, clause research, and drafting. Warning-Comprehensive reviews can consume significant Claude/OpenAI tokens, especially for large agreements, playbooks, exhibits, schedules, and multi-document reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an A/B codex review experiment — holistic codex review vs 3 focused dimension passes (security, ecto, liveview) on the branch diff, classify findings, report a panel-value verdict. Use when the branch is fresh, before any codex review runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an independent peer review via Codex. Use when the user asks to "peer review", "peer review my code", "peer review my plan", "get a second opinion", or "independent review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When handing work to the Codex CLI earns its cost, and how to size the run: second-model review, bounded implementation hand-offs, sandbox permissions, model and reasoning effort. Use when the user asks for Codex or `codex exec`, when a change is complex or high-stakes enough that an independent reviewer would change the outcome, or when a delegated run needs its model, effort, or permissions chosen. For agents other than Codex itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs Fable 5 and OpenAI Codex as co-founders on the Rocket Fuel operating system. Fable is the Visionary (vision, plan, standards, final review); Codex is the Integrator (filters the plan, executes the build, reports). Context-routed, one entry point, four functions: KICKOFF a new project, CLARITY BREAK to refactor an existing one, SAME PAGE MEETING to pressure-test a plan, BUILD A ROCK to hand Codex a scoped task. Use when the user says /rocket-fuel, wants to start or refactor a project with Codex, wants a plan reviewed by a second model, or wants to delegate a build to Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegates coding tasks to Codex CLI for prototyping, debugging, and code review. Use when: (1) Backend/logic implementation, (2) Algorithm design and optimization, (3) Bug analysis and debugging, (4) API/database code generation, (5) Code quality review and refactoring. Triggers: "implement algorithm", "debug", "analyze code", "backend task", "API implementation", "optimize performance", "refactor", "generate prototype", "code review". IMPORTANT: Default sandbox="read-only" (analysis/review/patch generation); use sandbox="workspace-write" only when codex must run tests/builds to verify. Always request unified diff patches only. Supports multi-turn sessions via SESSION_ID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch, start, monitor, and collect independent Codex subagents (gpt-6-luna at high, xhigh or max; gpt-6.1-sol for small review batches) for bounded parallel work, from Codex or from Claude Code, including requests supplied as a Markdown file of session prompts. This skill owns Codex subagent transport even when another investigation or review skill defines the questions. Use whenever the user asks for Luna or Sol agents, a swarm, many sessions, a concurrency test, a particular reasoning effort, a Codex subagent from Claude Code, or later collection of reports. Distinguish launch-only requests from requests to wait, collect, or synthesise. Route high and xhigh through the direct launcher; for 16 or more sessions, also invoke the direct launcher instead of native spawn_agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コードベースのアーキテクチャを 6 つの専門エージェントチーム（Claude 5体 + Codex 1体）で 多角的に分析し、リスク・デグレしやすい箇所・改善ポイントを洗い出すスキル。 パフォーマンス、スケーラビリティ、信頼性、セキュリティ、運用、DX、データ整合性、依存関係の 8 観点を 5 グループに分担し、さらに Codex がクロスカットレビュアーとして横断分析する。 エージェント同士が反論・補足・自由な議論を行い、合意形成した結果をレポートとして出力する。 どのプロジェクトでも使える汎用スキル。 Use when: アーキテクチャを分析したい、リファクタリング前にリスクを把握したい、 デグレしやすい箇所を知りたい、コードの健全性を確認したい、大きめの実装前に注意点を洗い出したい、 技術的負債を可視化したい、コードベースの品質を監査したい。 Triggers: "arch review", "アーキテクチャ分析", "アーキテクチャレビュー", "リスク分析", "コード監査", "codebase audit", "技術的負債", "デグレしやすい", "architecture analysis", "risk analysis", "コードの健全性", "品質チェック", "実装前の確認"

他の開発者のGitHub PRを下読みしてレビューコメント案を作り、人間が承認した内容だけを保留(PENDING)レビュー経由で投稿する。自作PRの修正ループには codex-pr-review-loop / claude-pr-review-loop を使う。

PRの未Resolveレビュー指摘に対応するスキル。「PRの指摘に対応して」「Resolveされていないスレッドを解消」「PR reviewの対応」「未解決のレビューコメントを修正」「Copilotの指摘を直して」「Codexの指摘に対応」「chatgpt-codex-connectorの指摘」「レビュー対応」で起動。PR URL or 番号 → 未Resolveスレッド取得 → 対象ファイル修正 → ユーザーへ最終ゲートとプッシュの実行手順を案内、の流れで進める。

Review, repair and steward the nightly Codex debt-sweep PR (branch codex/daily-debt/<date>). Judges every commit GOOD / REPAIR / REVERT, triages the bot review findings through /fix, lands one round-1 commit, files follow-up issues, then stewards the PR itself with a 3-round ceiling. Run by the 08:00 UTC cloud routine; also '/debt-review', '/debt-review 1789'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

複数のAIエージェントに開発や調査を分担させ、dmuxの画面で並行して進める手順をまとめます。担当範囲の切り分け、作業場所の分離、成果の統合を支援します。

• 調査と実装を並行して進めたいとき
• データベース・API・画面開発の分担
• テスト監視と修正を分担したいとき

Set up a Codex monitor for Vercel deployments and preview URLs. Use when the user invokes /vercel or $vercel, asks Codex to watch or monitor a Vercel deployment, waits for a Vercel preview or PR preview to become ready, or wants to be notified with both the deployment URL and preview URL once Vercel is READY.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gate via second model. Spawn a different AI model to review work before committing. Includes refusal routing: if one model refuses, switch silently to the next. Extended in v0.25.1 with structured review-mode gating (when to invoke vs not) and a Codex code-review handoff for the diff-review case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive OpenAI's Codex CLI (`codex exec`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Claude Code. Load WHENEVER you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Codex, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, fan out parallel agents across files or worktrees, or run a long mechanical job while you stay the planner. Covers the exact `codex exec` flags, sandbox tiers, output capture, JSON/schema modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a deep critical review of research from GPT using a secondary Codex agent. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文（用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。