「gui」の検索結果

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-338B (Electronic Reliability Design Handbook). Use for electronic reliability engineering: R/M/A theory, reliability specification/allocation/prediction, parts management and derating, reliable circuit and fault-tolerant design, environmental and human performance reliability, FMEA/FMECA/FTA/sneak circuit analysis, design reviews and testability, FRACAS, reliability demonstration and growth testing, and systems-level R&M parameters. Covers selected Part 2 design-guidance topics only; skips large annex/part-stress tables. Guidance handbook — not a contractual requirement text. Does not replace MIL-HDBK-217 prediction libraries, service-specific reliability regs, or safety standards (see mil-std-882).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-61B, the DoD Configuration Management (CM) guidance handbook (7 April 2020, cataloged with Change 1, 2025). Use for defense CM across the acquisition and sustainment life cycle: the five CM functions (planning, identification, control/change management, status accounting, verification & audit), the three configuration baselines (FBL/ABL/PBL) and FCD→ACD→PCD documentation, configuration items (CIs/HWCI/CSCI), change instruments (ECP/NOR/RFV), the CCB and Class I/II classification, CDCA/AA authority, FCA/PCA audits, data management and data rights (CDRL/DID, DFARS rights ladder, master/authoritative source), and tailoring CM by phase (EIA-649-1 R/T/NR matrix, Appendix C templates), plus digital-era CM (digital twin, viewpoints, MOSA). NOTE: 61B is advisory guidance that adopts and points to the SAE EIA-649 / EIA-649-1 / GEIA-HB-649 suite for the authoritative CM requirements — this pack names and describes that suite but does not reproduce its copyrighted requirement text. Thin on: the EIA-649 requirement clauses themselves, form-level detail (DD-form field instructions, full DID content), and non-DoD/commercial CM frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the OUSD(R&E) guidebook Implementing a MOSA in DoD Programs (Feb 2025). Use for the Modular Open Systems Approach as a DoD acquisition + design discipline: the statutory/regulatory basis (10 U.S.C. 4401–4403, FY2017/FY2021 NDAA, DFARS), the five OUSD(R&E) pillars, the plan→modularize→identify→define→standardize interface lifecycle, technical levers (WBS/MIL-STD-881F taxonomy, standards profiling, API-first software, COTS/cybersecurity), MOSA assessment metrics and tools (PART/OAAT/KOSS/SEAM/MAUT), technology-change and DMSMS management, roadmaps, MOSA across the six AAF pathways, and contracting/IP/data-rights mechanics. SCOPE LIMITS: this is U.S. DoD weapon-system acquisition policy, not a general open-architecture or interface-standards reference — it names standards (FACE, OMS, DISR) without reproducing them, is light on detailed engineering of any specific standard, and does not cover the underlying SE processes (use dau-se-guidebook / nasa-npr-7123) or general systems-engineering theory (use sebok).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Technology Readiness Assessment Guide (GAO-20-48G, 2020). Use for evaluating technology maturity in acquisition programs and projects: Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9) and related scales (MRL, IRL), identifying Critical Technology Elements (CTEs), the five-step process for a high-quality TRA, the four characteristics of a reliable TRA (comprehensive, well-documented, credible, defensible), Technology Maturation Plans (TMPs), and using TRA results in knowledge-based, milestone decisions. Assessment/maturity oriented: it measures readiness and frames risk — it is not a full SE process model, cost-estimating, or schedule guide (see sibling packs for those).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook (Version 2022, OSD ManTech / Joint Service–Industry MRL Working Group). Use for assessing and managing manufacturing maturity and producibility risk in defense acquisition: the 10-level MRL scale and its non-linear, target-not-grade nature; the five demonstration environments (laboratory → production-relevant → production-representative → pilot line → production line); the nine manufacturing-risk threads and sub-threads; how MRL targets map onto Adaptive Acquisition Framework milestones (MRL 4/6/7/8/9); conducting an MRL Assessment; building a Manufacturing Maturation Plan; putting MRL maturity into contract language (Section L/M, SOW, AS6500A, DIDs); tailoring criteria for S&T, single-system, ship, sustainment, and industry contexts; and screening operational-technology cybersecurity. Manufacturing-readiness focused — it measures producibility risk and frames mitigation; it is NOT a technology-readiness (TRL) guide, a full systems-engineering process model, a cost-estimating or schedule guide, or a deep cybersecurity audit method (see sibling packs for those).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Сравнение четырех психотерапевтических методов, утвержденных директивами в Германии: когнитивно-поведенческая терапия, психодинамическая терапия, психоанализ, системная терапия — Ориентировочное руководство.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comparativa de los cuatro enfoques psicoterapéuticos reglamentarios en Alemania: Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual, Psicoterapia de Orientación Psicodinámica, Psicoanálisis y Terapia Sistémica — Guía de orientación.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ドイツにおける公的医療保険適用対象の4つのガイドライン療法（認知行動療法、精神力動的心理療法、精神分析、システム療法）の比較 — オリエンテーションガイド。

Graded exposure for anxiety disorders: Fear hierarchy, SUDs scale, exposure planning and guidance. Psychoeducation only, not implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

德国四种法定医保资助的心理治疗取向对比：认知行为疗法、深层心理学取向心理治疗、精神分析、系统疗法 — 定向指南。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bindet das model-agnostische Computer-Use-Modul open-compute (Screenshot-Wahrnehmung, Windows-UIA-Elementklicks, sicherheitsgegatete Aktionen) fuer ALLE Agenten des Systems ein -- Claude Code, Codex und agy/Antigravity. Nutzen, wenn ein Dienst eine interaktive GUI- oder Browser-Aktion braucht, die kein reiner Text-/API-Weg loesen kann (Paradebeispiel: Tailscale-Reauth im Browser, sonstige Login-/Consent-Dialoge, Dialogfenster-Klicks). Standard ab 2026-08-02: open-compute statt Aufgeben oder Abwarten nutzen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interaktives Reißverschluss-Audit-Verfahren für eine Serie von Apps/Prüfobjekten: der User testet live und gibt kurzes Feedback im Chat, der Agent startet dabei bereits das nächste Objekt UND wertet parallel das Feedback des vorigen aus (strukturiert erfassen, Reparaturaufträge sofort an Worker delegieren) — statt sequenziell zu warten. Nutze diesen Skill bei "human-loop-audit", "lass uns die Apps im Reißverschluss durchtesten", "ich teste, du wertest aus und reparierst", oder wenn eine Reihe von GUIs/Produkten gemeinsam mit dem Nutzer durchgetestet werden soll und Befunde sofort in Reparaturen münden sollen. Abschluss ist eine strukturierte Befundliste je Objekt (Funktioniert/Defekt/Wunsch) plus die Liste der bereits gestarteten Reparaturen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cursorでローカルの差分・ファイルからリファクタリング改善案を返すnative入口。変更は適用せず、共有refactor-advisorとrefactor-guidanceを読み、reviewerのVERDICTから分離する。

コード・設計・指示のレビュー依頼で、対象と観点を確定し、観点ごとに独立した評価者へ配分して結果を統合する。割り当てられた観点の評価担当はcode-review-guidanceを使う。

Single-mainline governance for deployless repositories. Use after a deployless audit when a repo needs trunk-based branch rules, branch protection, contribution guidance, review gates, merge queue policy, AI PR intake rules, or agent-ready mainline practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for WordPress.org submission readiness of NV oOS standalone plugins (nvoos-docs-hub live at 0.5.3; nvoos-content-graph live at 1.0.10 in the re-submission loop; nvoos-design-system next in the pipeline — issue #6811). Covers the 18 wp.org guidelines, the Plugin Check (PCP) gate in CI and Docker, PCP finding triage, the reviewer-reply loop (findings taxonomy from the real 0.4.3 review, related-issue sweep checklist, reply-email template), packaging exclusion tri-sync, readme.txt standards, .wordpress-org listing assets, and the NV oOS Complete checkout-flow disclosure discipline (docs-hub 0.5.3, content-graph). Use when preparing a wp.org submission, responding to a reviewer email, fixing the plugin-check CI job, triaging PCP findings, or capturing listing screenshots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces complete brand identity systems — logos (AI-generated via Gemini), color palettes, typography, imagery guidelines, and WordPress-based brand asset libraries. Use when the task asks for "brand kit", "logo design", "brand guidelines", "brand identity", "visual identity", "brand colors", or "brand assets". Covers AI-assisted logo generation, asset sizing, brand archetypes, and WordPress brand page structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master orchestrator for B2B SaaS content creation and the editorial production system behind it. Use this skill to produce blog articles, whitepapers, case studies, video scripts, newsletters and ghostwritten thought leadership, to develop content strategy, and to run the publishing line itself — content briefs, editorial calendars and production capacity, review and approval workflow, subject-matter-expert access, the style guide, an AI-drafting policy, and a content inventory with owners. Also triggers on: blog, article, case study, whitepaper, newsletter, video script, ghostwriting, content calendar, editorial, thought leadership, content strategy, content brief, content operations, content ops, editorial workflow, managing editor, who reviews this, our content pipeline is stuck, content is stuck in review, content audit, content inventory, content governance, style guide, house style, SME interview, expert interview, freelance writers, AI content policy, how much content can we actually produce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for VS Code extension development from scaffolding to Marketplace publication

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for optimizing MSBuild incremental builds. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds slower than expected on subsequent runs, 'nothing changed but it rebuilds anyway', diagnosing why targets re-execute unnecessarily, fixing broken no-op builds. Covers 8 common causes: missing Inputs/Outputs on custom targets, volatile properties in output paths (timestamps/GUIDs), file writes outside tracked Outputs, missing FileWrites registration, glob changes, Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) issues. Key diagnostic: look for 'Building target completely' vs 'Skipping target' in binlog. DO NOT USE FOR: first-time build slowness (use build-perf-baseline), parallelism issues (use build-parallelism), evaluation-phase slowness (use eval-performance), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (overview, search, target details); falls back to dotnet build /bl, binlog replay with diagnostic verbosity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for interpreting ResolveProjectReferences time in MSBuild performance summaries. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. Activate when ResolveProjectReferences appears as the most expensive target and developers are trying to optimize it directly. Explains that the reported time includes wait time for dependent project builds and is misleading. Guides users to focus on task self-time instead. Do not activate for general build performance -- use build-perf-diagnostics instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。