「understand」の検索結果

The paper 'When EOS Tokens Disagree: Understanding Length Inflation in On-Policy Distillation' revea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software analysis. Use this skill when analyzing malware evasion techniques, when implementing anti-debugging protections for CTF challenges, when reverse engineering packed binaries, or when building security research tools that need to detect virtualized environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Never test mock behavior. Never add test-only methods to production classes. Understand dependencies before mocking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand how ideas evolved over time to find old solutions for new problems and avoid repeating past failures

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered codebase security scanner that reasons about code like a security researcher — tracing data flows, understanding component interactions, and catching vulnerabilities that pattern-matching tools miss. Use this skill when asked to scan code for security vulnerabilities, find bugs, check for SQL injection, XSS, command injection, exposed API keys, hardcoded secrets, insecure dependencies, access control issues, or any request like "is my code secure?", "review for security issues", "audit this codebase", or "check for vulnerabilities". Covers injection flaws, authentication and access control bugs, secrets exposure, weak cryptography, insecure dependencies, and business logic issues across JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, PHP, Go, Ruby, and Rust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when writing code that calls the Gemini API for text generation, multi-turn chat, multimodal understanding, image generation, video generation, streaming responses, background research tasks, function calling, structured output, or migrating from the old generateContent API. This skill covers the Interactions API, the recommended way to use Gemini models and agents in Python and TypeScript.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously deep-scan entire codebase line-by-line, understand architecture and patterns, then systematically transform it to production-grade, corporate-level professional quality with optimizations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a code education expert specializing in explaining complex code through clear narratives, visual diagrams, and step-by-step breakdowns. Transform difficult concepts into understandable explanations for developers at all levels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MSBuild property definition patterns: conditional defaults, composition/concatenation, path normalization, trailing slash handling, TFM detection helpers, and property evaluation order. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing MSBuild property definition issues in .props or .csproj files, reviewing and fixing shared property configuration anti-patterns, fixing DefineConstants or NoWarn being overwritten instead of appended, fixing unconditional property assignments that prevent project-level overrides, fixing unquoted conditions that fail when properties are empty, fixing hardcoded paths that break cross-platform builds, setting property defaults that can be overridden, understanding property evaluation order and last-write-wins semantics. DO NOT USE FOR: props vs targets placement (use directory-build-organization), item operations (use item-management), target structure (use target-authoring), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide developers through capturing diagnostic artifacts to diagnose production .NET performance issues. Use when the user needs help choosing diagnostic tools, collecting performance data, or understanding tool trade-offs across different environments (Windows/Linux, .NET Framework/modern .NET, container/non-container).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps find, inspect, and compare .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, comparing templates side by side, inspecting template parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for optimizing MSBuild build parallelism and multi-project scheduling. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds not utilizing all CPU cores, speeding up multi-project solutions, evaluating graph build mode (/graph), build time not improving with -m flag, understanding project dependency topology. Note: /maxcpucount default is 1 (sequential) — always use -m for parallel builds. Covers /maxcpucount, graph build for better scheduling and isolation, BuildInParallel on MSBuild task, reducing unnecessary ProjectReferences, solution filters (.slnf) for building subsets. DO NOT USE FOR: single-project builds, incremental build issues (use incremental-build), compilation slowness within a project (use build-perf-diagnostics), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (expensive_projects, expensive_targets, project_target_times); falls back to dotnet build -m, dotnet build /graph, binlog replay + grep.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for organizing MSBuild infrastructure with Directory.Build.props, Directory.Build.targets, Directory.Packages.props, and Directory.Build.rsp. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: structuring multi-project repos, centralizing build settings, implementing NuGet Central Package Management (CPM) with ManagePackageVersionsCentrally, consolidating duplicated properties across .csproj files, setting up multi-level Directory.Build hierarchy with GetPathOfFileAbove, understanding evaluation order (Directory.Build.props → SDK .props → .csproj → SDK .targets → Directory.Build.targets). Critical pitfall: $(TargetFramework) conditions in .props silently fail for single-targeting projects — must use .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems, migrating legacy projects to SDK-style (use msbuild-modernization), single-project solutions with no shared settings. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous coding agent. Delegate any task that involves understanding, writing, or running code — from a GitHub issue, a bug report, or a user request. It explores, implements, and verifies on its own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured changelogs from git history. Use when user asks "what changed recently", "generate a changelog", "summarize commits" or user wants to understand recent development activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert software engineer and systems analyst. Use when user asks "how does X work" with expectation of depth, user wants to understand a complex system spanning many files, or user asks for architectural analysis or pattern investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Notice what's deliberately missing from a design. Restraint is a taste signal. Use when studying minimalist products, evaluating design maturity, or understanding the power of removal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a design system into its constituent decisions and evaluate each one. Use when auditing design systems, evaluating consistency, or understanding how a product maintains quality at scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Study how products evolve over time using archived versions. The decisions that survive redesigns are the taste decisions. Use when understanding what's essential vs. cosmetic in a design, or learning from product evolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a designer's taste through their typography decisions alone. Type is the fastest taste signal in any design. Use when evaluating design maturity, assessing portfolio quality, or understanding what typography reveals about design thinking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose typefaces based on voice and context, not trends. Use when selecting fonts for a project, evaluating type choices, or understanding what a typeface communicates before anyone reads a word.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。