3,487 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Comprehensive Google Ads account health analysis detecting wasted spend, search term leaks, negative keyword gaps, bid strategy issues, and Quality Score problems. Use when analyzing campaign data, pasting Google Ads exports, reviewing account performance, or requesting a full diagnostic of advertising spend efficiency. Platform: Google.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LinkedIn Ads campaign analysis for B2B marketers detecting CTR issues, audience quality problems, lead gen form friction, and budget inefficiencies. Use when pasting LinkedIn campaign exports, analyzing B2B ad performance, or auditing LinkedIn advertising spend. Platform: LinkedIn.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality gate. 5 parallel agents review changes. All must pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compute the EXACT sub-transaction impact of a rollup rule in TRES Finance — every filter applied — and flag genuine problems (zero matches, overlap, config mistakes) before the rule is created. Two modes. Mode A: a pre-create quality gate invoked by the tres-rollup-rules skill to vet proposed candidate rules. Mode B: standalone review of a rule someone submitted or of existing PENDING rules. Trigger this skill when the user says "review this rollup rule", "what would this rollup rule actually match", "preview the rollup impact", "how many transactions would this rule catch", "is this rollup rule valid", "validate my rollup rule", "check my pending rollup rules", or "review the rollup requests". Do NOT use this to design or propose new rollups — that is tres-rollup-rules. This skill only measures impact and flags issues; it never executes mutations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate publication-quality PNG chart images from data, supporting line, bar, area, candlestick, pie, and heatmap charts. Triggers when the user asks to visualize data, create a graph, plot a time series, or generate a chart for a report, alert, or dashboard. Runs as a lightweight, headless Node.js process without a browser.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify code", "run verification", "check quality", "validate changes", or before creating a PR. Provides comprehensive verification including build, type check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "generate daily paper", "search arXiv for EEG papers", "find EEG decoding papers", "review brain-computer interface papers", or wants to create paper summaries for EEG/brain decoding/speech decoding research. This skill automates searching arXiv for recent papers on EEG decoding, EEG speech decoding, or brain foundation models, reviewing paper quality, and generating structured Chinese/English summaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to review a diff or pull request, write review comments, audit code quality, establish review standards, or improve how a team performs code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute research implementation plans efficiently while maintaining estimation quality and finishing features
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic audit and review by Referee 2. Two modes — "deck" reviews slide presentations for rhetoric, visual quality, and compile cleanliness; "code" performs cross-language replication and econometric audit of empirical pipelines. Use when reviewing slides, auditing code, or verifying replication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors found — not substantive academic critique. Triggers include: "proofread", "check for typos", "grammar check", "look for errors in my draft", "proofread all", "polish this", "check my writing", "are there any mistakes", "proofread before I send this", or when the user wants a clean-up pass rather than feedback on arguments or methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review research code for reproducibility and quality, extract the paper's main empirical claims, compare paper to code, and write a constructive markdown report. Designed for social science / economics projects with LaTeX papers and Stata, R, or Python code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill covers publication-quality tables and figures for academic research papers. Use when formatting regression results, summary statistics, Monte Carlo output, or research visualizations for LaTeX inclusion. Triggers on "table", "figure", "tabulate", "stargazer", "publication-ready", "LaTeX table", "event study plot", "coefficient plot", "RD plot", "power curve", "specification curve", "binscatter", "format results", "booktabs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Econometrics skill for creating publication-quality LaTeX regression and summary tables. Activates when the user asks about: "regression table", "LaTeX table", "esttab", "stargazer", "modelsummary", "publication table", "format results", "multi-panel table", "journal table", "export regression results", "table formatting", "回归表格", "LaTeX表格", "结果导出", "论文表格", "回归结果格式化", "多模型表格"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Activate when the user is drafting any academic economics content from scratch (e.g., outlines, abstracts, introductions, data/methods/identification sections, results narratives, conclusions, referee responses, table/figure captions) and needs economics-specific structure, phrasing options, and quality checks to produce publication-ready prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Econometrics skill for generating publication-quality figures for top economics journals. Activates when the user asks about: "econometric figure", "publication figure", "journal figure", "AER figure", "QJE figure", "event study plot", "coefficient plot", "coefplot", "binned scatter", "binscatter", "RDD plot", "parallel trends plot", "kernel density", "distribution plot", "time series plot", "map", "figure formatting", "academic plot", "论文图表", "学术图", "系数图", "事件研究图", "散点图", "分布图", "趋势图", "回归可视化"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly work across quality dimensions (novelty, rigor, significance, and clarity). Use to critique academic papers, research proposals, literature reviews, or grant applications and produce a structured, criterion-based assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms"). Use this skill when asked to "remove AI-isms," "clean up AI writing," "edit writing for AI patterns," "audit writing for AI tells," or "make this sound less like AI." Supports a detection-only mode that flags patterns without rewriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 9-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via Gemini. Given experiment results or data, auto-selects chart type and generates data-driven figures via matplotlib/seaborn. Use when creating any figure for a conference paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。