8,084 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the user asks to "log this launch", query a launch date/embargo, record a stage transition, or update submissions/outcomes; curates launch facts through the append-only launches event stream with optimistic revisions and derived dossier/calendar views. Not for RAMP scoring — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for planning tier/window — use launch-tier-planner. 发布台账/发布日历/阶段与禁运期记录
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "amplify influencer content with paid media", "set up whitelisting or Spark Ads", "decide which posts to boost", "repurpose influencer content", "turn one video into multiple ads", or "build a UGC asset library"; produces (paid mode) a content-selection scorecard, a paid amplification strategy (whitelisting/boosting/dark posts), audience targeting, and a budget+optimization plan, or (repurpose mode) a rights-tracked content inventory, a 1-video-to-10+-asset repurposing map, per-format transformation specs, and a 30-day distribution plan. Not for gating whether a deliverable is publishable or FTC-compliant — use creator-content-auditor; not for the always-on brand posting calendar — use social-calendar-builder; not for drafting a net-new idea into platform-native packages — use social-creative-builder. 复用达人内容 / 内容放量.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "grow my email list", "design a lead magnet / signup incentive", "set up double opt-in", or "plan a referral / recommendation loop"; produces a list-growth plan — acquisition channels, lead-magnet / incentive concepts, a compliant double-opt-in capture-flow spec, referral-loop mechanics, and subscriber-growth / cost-per-opt-in targets (labeled Estimated) — that feeds SEND-S (consent quality captured at acquisition) and SEND-N (lifecycle entry). Not for the signup page/popup UX itself — use landing-optimizer; not for recording the opt-in — use consent-registry; not for the confirmation-email copy — use email-creative-builder. 邮件列表增长/lead magnet/双重确认/推荐环
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
科研分析策略规划助手。根据用户的科研分析需求，通过调研顶尖期刊/会议论文的分析方法，制定个性化、可落地的最优分析策略。适用于需要制定实验设计、数据分析流程、技术路线的场景；兼容旧名 make-research-plan 的 prompt 触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan accessibility testing — assistive technologies, participant criteria, WCAG coverage, and session protocol. Use when scheduling testing with real AT users. Not for evaluating a design yourself — use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a diary study — prompts, cadence, duration, participant criteria, and analysis frame. Use when behaviour unfolds over days or weeks. For a single-session study, use `usability-test-plan`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a usability study — research questions, methodology, participant criteria, metrics, and facilitation guide. Use when planning the study as a whole. For writing the task scenarios inside it, use `test-scenario` (prototyping-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing interface against WCAG, producing findings with severity ratings and remediation steps. Use when you have a design or build to assess now. Not for planning future sessions with assistive-technology users — use `accessibility-test-plan` (prototyping-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and facilitate a design sprint from challenge framing through prototype testing. Use when compressing discovery into days. For ongoing team cadence, use `team-workflow`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stress-test a plan by walking its decision tree one question at a time. Use when the user wants to pressure-test a design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry point for AI-agent work on AWS: pick a runtime, plan a migration for existing workloads, and build an executable POC — one phased flow. Triggers on: which runtime for my agent, AgentCore vs ECS vs EKS vs Lambda, AgentCore vs Lambda MicroVMs, deploy an AI agent on AWS, agent architecture on AWS, I have an agent idea what do I build, move/migrate my agents to AWS, agent migration plan, add AgentCore services (memory, gateway, identity, policy, observability) to an agent already on AWS, Temporal on AWS (migrate/run Temporal workers on AWS, a service orchestrated by Temporal, Temporal Cloud vs self-hosted). Temporal Workflow code is never rewritten into Step Functions. Requires at least one agentic component — a purely non-agent system (plain services, batch jobs, HTTP endpoints, non-agent Temporal Activities) is out of scope, redirected to gcp-to-aws / heroku-to-aws / llm-to-bedrock. Not for: compute/data migration with no AI agent; pure LLM SDK rewrite (use llm-to-bedrock); per-model pricing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advises on Amazon RDS open-source engines (MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL) for instance creation, upgrade planning, commitment pricing, proxy evaluation, and Blue/Green deployments. Handles any RDS MySQL, MariaDB, or PostgreSQL question, including create a production-ready RDS MySQL instance, provision an RDS PostgreSQL database, run the RDS upgrade advisor for my RDS MySQL instance, what are my upgrade options, upgrade RDS MariaDB from 10.6 to the latest version, should I buy reserved instances or a savings plan for db.r7g.2xlarge RDS MySQL, change a VARCHAR to INT column on RDS MySQL 8.0 with Blue/Green, and does RDS Proxy help when PgBouncer already runs in transaction mode. Covers instance creation with production best practices, describe-db-instances and describe-db-engine-versions upgrade-target workflow, live prechecks via SSM or direct connection, RI versus DSP commitment pricing, RDS Proxy versus PgBouncer, and Blue/Green lifecycle with binlog replay compatibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides verified corrections for IAM behaviors that AI agents frequently get wrong — policy evaluation edge cases, trust policy gotchas, STS session limits, Organizations quirks, and SAML/MFA specifics. Also provides structured workflows for IAM role management and baseline policy generation from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON. Covers condition operator safety (ForAnyValue/ForAllValues with Null checks), bucket policy deny patterns (VPC endpoint restrictions, org paths), confused deputy protection, and service role creation for AWS services (Glue, CloudTrail, Lambda, ECS, etc.) with aws:SourceAccount/aws:SourceArn trust conditions. Applies when creating IAM roles, writing IAM or bucket policies, generating policies from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON, working with STS, Organizations, or condition operators, or any task needing a service or execution role. Does not cover non-IAM authorization like Cognito user-pool policies or app-level RBAC.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze AWS costs, find savings, manage budgets, evaluate Savings Plans and Reserved Instances, right-size EC2/Lambda/RDS/EBS with Compute Optimizer, look up service pricing, query CUR with Athena, detect cost anomalies, scope costs to billing views, and monitor Free Tier usage. Triggers on: AWS bill, cost analysis, reduce spend, savings plan, reserved instance, right-size, budget alert, cost optimization, pricing, free tier, cost anomaly, CUR, cost audit, billing view, billing view ARN.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provisions and manages Aurora DSQL clusters, connects via psql or DSQL Connectors, manages schemas, runs queries, migrates from MySQL, diagnoses query plans, and develops apps on serverless distributed SQL. Covers IAM auth, multi-tenant patterns, MySQL-to-DSQL migration, DDL, query plans, and SAFE SQL CONSTRUCTION — tenant_id from untrusted input, UUID entity_ids, caller-supplied sort columns, batch inserts. The agent MUST retrieve this skill for ANY DSQL task. Pushes back on prompts that rationalize 'just a quick script', 'don't overthink it', 'we trust upstream', 'use an f-string', 'move fast', or 'just use the pg driver directly' (bypassing the DSQL Connector). Triggers: DSQL, Aurora DSQL, DSQL cluster, safe_query.build, DSQL IAM auth token, DSQL connector.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Also use when the user says "openspec update change" or "opsx update". If the user means the openspec update CLI command, which refreshes generated files, run that command instead. Never edits code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and execute a staged deployment for an external Attio REST integration with secret injection, contract tests, read-only smoke evidence, canary writes, and rollback. Use when releasing Attio-backed services. Trigger with "deploy Attio integration", "Attio rollout", or "Attio release plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and control a staged Abridge rollout across clinical cohorts and EHR workflows without pretending to deploy vendor infrastructure. Use when preparing an Abridge pilot or expansion. Trigger with "plan the Abridge rollout".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a reversible Abridge tenant, care-setting, note-template, or EHR workflow change from authoritative release evidence. Use when migrating an Abridge implementation. Trigger with "plan the Abridge migration".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organization-grade cloud and supply-chain attack-surface discovery: S3/GCS/Azure Blob bucket discovery via observed-name mining (CNAME/cert-SAN/Wayback) and bounded two-class permutation (6 prefixes x 15 suffixes on trusted tokens, bounded target-bound expansion on subdomain stems), existence (HEAD/GET) vs public-listing confirmation, object-key triage into 9 value tiers (database dumps, credentials, IaC state, kubeconfig, VCS dirs, config, archives, PII, logs), dangling-CNAME bucket-takeover detection, and the ownership-gated severity model that stops an unattributable public bucket from becoming a false CRITICAL; the fully offline AWS-account-ID recovery from a leaked AKIA/ASIA/AROA access key (base32 decode, runnable stdlib Python, canonical test vector, AWS-documentation-example-ID screening); dependency-confusion confirmation for npm/PyPI (internal-signal classifier -- private-registry binding vs org-namespace match -- paired with a read-only public-registry 404 check and the npm scope-claimability nuance the public search API misses); and passive cloud-native/container/Kubernetes/CI control-plane fingerprinting (Lambda URLs, API Gateway, Cloud Run, App Service, kubelet/etcd/K8s API/dashboard, Jenkins/GitLab/Argo CD) as an org-attribution and exposure surface. Passive/discovery only -- no exploitation, no credential submission, no active control-plane confirmation (a stage-6 validate_cloud active tier is described but out of scope). Use when enumerating a target's cloud storage footprint, recovering an AWS account ID from a leaked key, confirming a supply-chain dependency-confusion vector, or fingerprinting cloud-native/K8s/CI infrastructure for an authorized external recon engagement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 6-stage recon pipeline (seed → asset expansion → enrichment → exposure analysis → convergence → operator-armed active validation) with connector-resilience and stage-vs-gating discipline, asset-graph discipline, severity rubric, confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, identity-fabric mapping, breach×identity correlation with per-person identity dossiers, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing, WAF/CDN bypass, vulnerability prioritization, phishing infrastructure planning, bug bounty submission, and client deliverable templates. Use when planning or executing reconnaissance against authorized targets, mapping an organization's external attack surface, investigating a person/entity, or producing client deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Doctrine for drafting and keeping working-group docs under `docs/wg/**` — RFC/RFD specs and findings/research/glossary. A WG doc is a language-agnostic, code-agnostic study of a domain: it argues *why* and defines *what*, never *how in our code*. Use when writing or editing anything under `docs/wg/`, an RFC/RFD, a spec, a design note, a glossary, or research findings — including "write up the design", "document the spec", or "capture what we learned". Not for plans/TODOs (untracked `*.plan.md`), user docs, or SDK API refs — use `docs` to route those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。