420 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review and summarise any contract or legal agreement. Use when asked to review a contract, check an agreement, flag legal risks, or summarise key clauses. Produces a structured review with key terms, flagged clauses, risk rating, and plain English summary. Not a substitute for qualified legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan a contract you're about to sign in plain language — surface the clauses that could bite you, what they mean, and what to question or renegotiate. Use when asked to check this contract before I sign, what am I agreeing to, are there red flags in this agreement, or explain this contract's risky bits. Produces a plain-English flag list of the risky/unusual clauses (auto-renewal, lock-in, liability, IP, termination, fees), what each means for you, questions to ask, and suggested changes — flagging when it's important enough for a lawyer. Not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain what a piece of code does in plain English, at the depth the reader needs. Use when asked to explain code, walk through a function, understand an unfamiliar snippet, or onboard to a file. Produces a one-line summary, a step-by-step walkthrough, the non-obvious parts called out, and any bugs or smells spotted along the way.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 做一份外贸报价单, FOB 和 CIF 怎么报价, 出口报价核算, 报价怎么算利润, 退税怎么算进报价, quotation sheet for an export order, or price an export quotation from China. Produces a cost build-up from the factory price through export tax rebate, domestic logistics, port charges, freight and insurance to each Incoterms 2020 term, a quotation sheet in English with a Chinese summary, quantity tiers, validity and exchange-rate assumptions, payment terms and the risk each term puts on the seller, with rates marked to confirm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a contract clause in plain English — what it means, who it favours, the realistic risk, and what to negotiate. Use when asked what a clause means, to decode legal language, explain a term in a contract, or assess whether a provision is standard or aggressive. Produces a plain-language translation, a who-does-this-favour read, a risk rating, and concrete redline suggestions. Not legal advice; confirm with counsel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 写8D报告, 客户投诉8D, 质量问题8D, 客诉回复报告, 8D 怎么写, 根本原因分析报告, or write an 8D problem-solving report for a customer complaint or internal quality issue in a Chinese factory. Produces a bilingual (Chinese and English) 8D report from D0 to D8 with the problem described by 5W2H, dated containment actions and suspect-stock quantities, root cause for both occurrence and escape (流出) with 5 Why and fishbone evidence, verified corrective actions, prevention through updated PFMEA, control plan and SOP, and closure criteria, in the format customers expect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 回复询盘, 外贸询盘怎么回, 帮我回客户邮件, 阿里国际站询盘回复, 客户只问价格怎么回, 跟进没回复的客户, or reply to a foreign-trade inquiry from a Chinese exporter. Produces a reply email in English (or the buyer's language) with a Chinese version for the sales team, a read of the inquiry's quality and the buyer's likely type, the questions to qualify the buyer, a price or quotation approach without underselling, and a follow-up sequence for no reply, with export-control and sanctions checks flagged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a cap table, dilution, SAFEs, option pools, and round mechanics in plain English with the actual math. Use when asked to explain dilution, model a SAFE or priced round, size an option pool, understand a term sheet's economics, or figure out who owns what after a raise. Produces a worked ownership breakdown before/after the round, the dilution math step by step, and the traps founders miss. Not legal or financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to check whether a figure is audited, which headline numbers sit outside the audited accounts, what 'adjusted' or 'underlying' means in this report, or who is vouching for the numbers in the highlights. For every headline figure in the highlights, chairman's statement and CEO review of an uploaded annual report, states whether it sits inside or outside the audited statements and what was added or removed versus the nearest audited number. Produces a boundary table, the list of figures outside the boundary, and a plain-English summary of who is vouching for what. Educational, not financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains code snippets in plain English, breaking down what the code does step by step. Perfect for learning, code reviews, or documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create fast, high-impact 15-30 second brand and product marketing videos from an official company website, verified brand sources, or user-uploaded product imagery. Use for launch films, website motion videos, AI/SaaS demos, product promos, and Vibe Motion/Remotion productions that require exact logos, authentic imagery, English-first copy, product-feature storytelling, strong visual impact, smooth transitions, and deterministic frame-based animation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which English agriculture / environment / earth-science journal skill to invoke next, comparing fit across the 30-journal agriculture-and-environment roadmap, or routing a manuscript before venue-specific re-framing. Routes by sub-field (agronomy / plant / soil / food / environment / earth / climate), contribution type, and evidence shape (field trial / lab assay / observational survey / model / dataset).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert English-language properties in PROPERTIES.md (produced by the Fizz skill) into Solidity assertions inside the existing fuzz harness, then flip their checkboxes. Trigger on "fizz-convert", "convert properties", "implement properties from PROPERTIES.md", "convert PROPERTIES.md to Solidity".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three modes for CS-conference papers (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV vision, ACL/EMNLP/NAACL NLP, ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/AAAI ML). DIRECT-EDIT mode (common): the user describes a change in Chinese or English and the manuscript (LaTeX or Markdown) is edited directly through a CS-venue writing toolkit with author sign-off (use for 改这段 / 把中文想法写成 latex / polish / de-AI / translate / compress a passage). REVIEW mode (occasional, pre-submission): harden the paper through an adversarial courtroom review engine (N holistic domain reviewers / contestability routing / two-sided trial / three-way verdict / clerk-converged multi-round loop) with consensus-gated, author-signed revisions (use for review / critique / 审稿 / 评审 / mock-review). AUTO mode (unattended, opt-in via /goal): run the review-revise loop toward a verifiable goal, applying safe fixes under a drift-bounded policy and queueing risky ones. Resolves all inputs at runtime, no hardcoded paths. Not a from-scratch drafter (use ml-paper-writing) and not an official-venue rebuttal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing repository documentation for drift, stale statements, broken references, or README mismatches, especially across published docs under `doc/` and key entry surfaces such as `README.md` (English default), `README.zh-CN.md`, `mcp/README.md`, and `mcp/README.zh-CN.md` during periodic maintenance or before preparing corrective PRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn books, PDFs, slides, documents, web pages and text into a source-grounded knowledge base, interactive learning HTML and Markdown in English or Chinese. Use for learning, summaries, explanations, review, quizzes, relationship maps, saving reusable methodology files, retrieving or comparing accumulated methods, and applying them to a real problem. 将材料转为可追溯知识库与交互学习页，支持中英文、关系图、方法论保存/检索/比较及应用；区分材料依据、推断与外部核验。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit CapCut / JianYing video projects — read and write subtitles, timing, speed, volume, templates, animations (fade/ken-burns), and cut long-form to shorts. Use when the user mentions capcut, jianying, subtitles, video editing, draft_content.json, draft_info.json, or cutting videos — in English or Chinese (剪映, 字幕, 草稿, 剪辑, 切片, 视频编辑).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces an adversarial attack on a legal argument that survives reply. Runs the opposing-counsel discipline twice: an unrestrained first pass, then the same instrument turned on that pass to cut every point that collapses under challenge - attacks on conceded facts, wrong-forum objections, speculation about documents and motives, gotchas with innocent explanations, overclaims, self-refuting assertions, and padding. The deliverable is one standalone attack containing only what can be defended, capped at five heads, not a discussion of the discarded draft. Use to attack, stress-test, red-team or rebut a submission, brief, motion, witness statement, letter or structured legal reasoning. Triggers on "attack this but only with points that hold", "no cheap shots", "what survives reply", "which points can I actually defend", "give me the version I can file", "double-pass adversarial review". Also use when an earlier adversarial review came back overlong or scattershot. Formal British English.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Act as experienced opposing counsel to attack, undermine, and expose weaknesses in a legal argument, submission, witness statement, or structured reasoning. Produces a six-part adversarial analysis: 1. A core theory of attack identifying the single most effective way to defeat the argument; 2. A reconstructed version of the opposing argument stripped of rhetoric to expose its fragility; 3. Primary lines of attack grouped by category (legal misstatement, evidential gaps, causation failures, internal inconsistency, over-reliance on assertion, procedural weakness); 4. An "if I were the judge" section showing how a sceptical tribunal would dismantle the argument; 5. Surgical strikes - 3 to 5 high-impact points ready for oral submissions; and 6. An analysis of what the argument is trying to hide. Written in formal, adversarial British English for a legally trained audience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a legal document against legal design principles. Scores the document on six pillars: language patterns (bureaucratese, archaisms, passive voice, nominalization), readability (Flesch Reading Ease and language-specific equivalents), structure and navigation, hidden conditions (material obligations buried away from their headings), statutory duplication (restating the law instead of citing it), and visual hierarchy where layout is available. Assessment-only; does not rewrite the document. Works on English, French, and German documents, inferring the applicable jurisdiction from the document's language and textual signals: governing-law clause, statute citations, party addresses. Use when a user shares a legal document (contract, NDA, T&C, privacy policy, internal policy) asking how good the drafting is from a legal design perspective, whether it is readable, whether it contains buried clauses or restates the law, or how it scores on Flesch / LIX / Amstad / Kandel-Moles readability metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when asked to translate, explain, or map Icelandic legal terms to English (or vice versa). Triggers on requests involving Icelandic legal vocabulary, legal translation, understanding Icelandic statutes or court decisions, or cross-referencing Icelandic and common law concepts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a legal question, a set of draft questions, or source material such as a statute, jury instruction, rubric, contract checklist, or coding manual into a battery of narrow questions that TypeSafe's Jev, a fast classifier that returns probabilities rather than prose, can answer reliably across many documents. The skill breaks conclusions such as negligence, felony murder, or standing into element-level questions, writes the governing rule into each question, and delivers the questions alone, in Jev's request format or in plain English. Built for legal work that asks the same questions of many texts: coding statutes across jurisdictions, coding opinions or case files for empirical research, checking contracts against a review checklist, screening intake narratives, and grading student work against a rubric. Use when asked to write Jev questions, build a classifier for legal documents, or turn a legal test into yes-or-no questions. Running the questions requires Jev access; writing them does not.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforms reading-oriented prose into listening-optimized text for flat, neutral vocal delivery — TTS, podcasts, audiobooks, CLE audio. Carries a legal layer: case citations, section symbols, subsection lettering, Latin terms and footnotes are unspeakable as written, so a brief, opinion, statute, contract or memo needs them expanded, restructured or stripped before it can be listened to — and quoted authority is never rewritten. Use when converting written content for audio, preparing oral argument by ear, producing CLE or client-facing audio, or making a document listenable on a commute. Triggers on "make this listenable," "convert for audio," "optimize for reading aloud," "prepare for TTS," "make an audio version," "podcast script," "read this aloud." Supports English, French, Spanish, Italian, German and Portuguese; outputs plain text, ElevenLabs audio tags, or SSML for Amazon Polly, Google or Azure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。