本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

Trust Decay

Capture a confident agent claim (Phase 1) or resolve one as right/wrong (Phase 2) in vault/memory/TRUST_DECAY.md. Builds the longitudinal record of agent calibration over time. Pairs with /honesty-check (which should reduce Phase 1 frequency) and /diagnose (which surfaces causes that often reveal Phase 2 events).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wrg32786/aigent-osスター 25(GitHub 25 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Trust Decay

The two-phase ledger that tracks confident agent claims and their eventual outcomes. See [[Cost of Confidence]] for the doctrine.

When to use

Phase 1 — Capture a confident claim

  • An agent declared something "fixed", "tested", "verified", "complete", "deployed"
  • The claim is unhedged or treated as ground truth
  • The claim is consequential enough that being wrong about it would matter
  • Triggered by Caddy on prompts like: "/trust-decay capture", "log this claim", "capture confidence", "agent claimed", "I claimed", "the agent said it was fixed", "another agent verified"

Phase 2 — Resolve a claim

  • A previously-captured claim has been confirmed (right) or revealed wrong
  • The principal noticed a discrepancy between an earlier claim and reality
  • Triggered by Caddy on prompts like: "/trust-decay resolve", "the bug came back", "that wasn't actually fixed", "trust event", "wrong claim", "confidence was wrong"

How to execute

Phase 1 — Capture

## YYYY-MM-DD — {short claim summary}
**Claim:** "{the actual confident statement, verbatim}"
**Source:** {agent name or self}
**Context:** {what task, what session, what was being worked on}
**Verification stated:** {what the claimant said they verified, if anything}
**Status:** OPEN — awaiting outcome

Append to vault/memory/TRUST_DECAY.md under the "Open" section.

The principal can capture manually, OR /honesty-check (when wired) can auto-capture any unhedged confident claim it produces.

Phase 2 — Resolve

When a previously-captured claim is proved or disproved:

  1. Find the open entry in vault/memory/TRUST_DECAY.md matching the claim
  2. Append resolution data:
**Resolution (YYYY-MM-DD):** WRONG | PARTIALLY WRONG | CONFIRMED CORRECT
**Evidence:** {what surfaced the discrepancy — file/line/log/observation}
**Time-to-discovery:** {duration from claim to discovery}
**Trust-decay event:** YES | NO
**Pattern:** {one line — what category of mistake/correctness was this?}
  1. Move the entry from the "Open" section to the "Resolved" section.

Step 3 — Optional aggregate

If the principal asks for the trust trajectory, walk the ledger and compute:

Trust trajectory ({start date} → {end date}):
- Total claims captured: N
- Confirmed correct: M (X%)
- Wrong: P (Y%)
- Partially wrong: Q (Z%)

By category:
- Doc work: X/Y correct
- Infrastructure: ...
- Production fixes: ...

Recurring patterns:
- {pattern name}: occurred N times — promote to /diagnose checks?

This output becomes the basis for /retro analysis and feeds into the [[Common Failure Modes]] corpus.

Why two phases

The pairing is the whole point. A confident claim with no resolution is just rhetoric. A wrong outcome with no original claim is just a bug. The pair — confident claim, then disconfirmation — is what measures calibration.

Anti-patterns this prevents

  • Forgetting that the agent claimed something was fixed three weeks ago when the same bug recurs (no audit trail)
  • Treating every fresh occurrence of an old bug as new (no pattern detection)
  • Letting agent confidence levels drift without a corrective signal (no calibration data)
  • Blaming the agent in the moment without realizing it's the Nth time the same pattern has played out (no longitudinal context)

What this skill is NOT

  • Not a punishment system. The ledger calibrates the agent's claims against outcomes. It's measurement, not judgment.
  • Not adversarial. Capturing a confident claim isn't accusing the agent of being wrong; it's noting what the agent said so the eventual outcome can pair with it.
  • Not the only place to track confidence. [[Honesty Check]] is the agent-side discipline; [[Reading Agent Output Defensively]] is the principal-side discipline; this skill is the longitudinal data layer that makes both useful over time.

Connects to

  • [[Cost of Confidence]] — the doctrine note this skill instantiates
  • [[Honesty Check]] — should reduce Phase 1 capture frequency over time (fewer unhedged claims = fewer entries to resolve later)
  • [[Reading Agent Output Defensively]] — the principal-side pattern that often triggers a Phase 1 capture
  • [[Common Failure Modes]] — sister corpus tracking layer-level failures rather than confidence-level failures
  • vault/memory/TRUST_DECAY.md — the ledger file
  • Closing the Measurement Loop — the Stop hook that prompts a Phase 1 capture when a turn's confident claims went unrecorded
  • /retro (forthcoming v0.3) — quarterly analysis that consumes this ledger

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Track and surface sub-agent dispatch calibration ratios. Extract from JSONL transcript or read existing ledger. Per-agent clean/blocked/errored/partial trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

Compose the AIgent's body state by reading existing signals. Lazy compute. Never polled. Reports the five pressures + recommended reflex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

brief

無料

Generate a structured delegation brief for any task

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

Quarterly skill that walks the skill-index against the actual SKILL.md files on disk, reports drift (skills indexed that no longer exist, skills on disk that aren't enrolled, skills whose descriptions have changed since enrollment). Hardens the auto-enrollment pipeline against silent rot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

When a [CADDY] hint fires and the principal is confused why, /caddy-explain walks the scoring transparently — which trigger matched, what points it earned, what the threshold was, what other skills were close. Pairs with the legibility thesis. Caddy's decisions should be inspectable on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

Enroll a skill into Caddy's index so it can be surfaced when the right prompt arrives. Use when a new skill is created, copied in, or when a skill needs updated triggers. Usage — "/caddy-enroll <path to SKILL.md>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

wrg32786 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する