315 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Synthesize user interviews, observations, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or feedback into traceable themes, insights, tensions, opportunities, and research gaps; use when evidence must inform product or design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews marketing, packaging, web or sustainability text against the environmental-claim rules the user supplies (house policy, regulator guidance extract, industry code) and returns a DRAFT claims review: every environmental claim quoted verbatim with location and family, the evidence the text or evidence pack offers for it with date and scope, the supplied rule passages that bear on each claim, observations as read, and separate question lists for legal and for marketing. No compliance, greenwashing or substantiation verdict. Use when the user asks to "review these green claims", "check this copy against our environmental claims policy", "what evidence do we have for carbon neutral here", "list the sustainability claims in this brochure" or "prepare questions for legal on this eco campaign". Do not use for mapping general factual claims to evidence, use claims-evidence-map instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads two or more supplier, bid or tender responses against a requirements list and returns a DRAFT comparison pack: a requirement-by-supplier matrix, gaps per supplier, clarification questions and neutral observations, for an evaluation panel. Never scores, weights, ranks or recommends a winner; the award stays with the panel. Use when the user asks to "compare these bids", "matrix the tender responses against our requirements", "collate the RFQ replies", "show me where each supplier falls short" or "draft clarification questions for the bidders". Do not use for scoring or weighting against agreed criteria, use supplier-evaluation-matrix instead, or for writing the requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads one spreadsheet, CSV export or pasted table together with the user's question and drafts an insight pack: a data profile, observations cited to named columns and values and framed as leads, caveats, and suggested charts and follow-up analyses. Every figure carries the label "as read, verify in source"; correlation is never stated as causation. Use when the user asks to "profile this spreadsheet", "what does this data say", "find anomalies in this extract", "give me a first read on this CSV" or "summarise this table". Do not use for a purchase order log or spend extract, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; for actuals versus budget, use budget-variance-explainer instead; for a report that arrives by email on a schedule, use report-attachment-analyzer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proposes the piping content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: line inventory with off-page continuity and required ancillary lines, line identification elements per the project line numbering procedure, connection items at nozzles matched to a quoted schedule, per quoted standards, specification break questions and observations. Every proposal cites its source and revision; no source, no proposal; never sizes a line or selects a class. Use when the user asks to "run the piping enrichment", "start the discipline enrichment", "list the lines the P&ID adds to this PFD" or "fill the line identifiers from the numbering procedure" after gate G2. Do not use for instruments, loops or instrument tags, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use before gate G2, use process-model-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Turn findings into a defensible intelligence product — BLUF key judgements, standardised estimative probability language, per-claim sourcing with timestamps and archived copies, separated observation, inference and assessment,… Use when writing an intelligence report, due-diligence memo, evidence pack or executive summary, or when asked to write up an investigation so it survives challenge
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document completed work — update task log, sync documentation, log observations. Use after finishing a task or batch of changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remote-sensing literature search, citation verification, sensor/platform/dataset query strategy, citation file management (.ris/.bib/.enw conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, DOI/arXiv lookup) across CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Semantic Scholar, and domain web sources. Use when the user needs coordinated multi-step literature workflows for remote sensing, Earth observation, geospatial AI, GIScience, photogrammetry, SAR, hyperspectral imaging, LiDAR, satellite missions, benchmark datasets, land-cover mapping, change detection, object detection, segmentation, retrieval, or multimodal remote-sensing foundation models. Also trigger on general literature-search needs during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as searching for papers/literature, doing a literature review, verifying a citation, converting citation files, and Chinese phrasings like 文献检索、查文献、找文献、 文献综述检索、查论文、引文核对、参考文献管理、文献去重.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a complete but efficient Nature-style Chinese PPTX presentation from a remote-sensing, Earth-observation, geospatial AI, or broader scientific paper, preprint, PDF, article text, abstract, figure legends, or reading notes. Use this skill whenever the user asks to make slides/PPT/PPTX for journal club, group meeting, paper sharing, thesis seminar, lab meeting, department report, or academic presentation from a remote-sensing research paper. It identifies the paper type and argument, selects only the figures needed for the story, writes Chinese slide content and speaker notes, creates the actual .pptx deck, and runs an explicit self-review/corrective revision loop focused on figure quality, text overflow prevention, and non-template visual design before delivery. Also trigger on general academic-presentation requests even without the word "Nature", such as turning a paper into slides, building an academic talk deck, conference/defense presentations, and Chinese phrasings like 论文做PPT、遥感论文汇报、组会PPT、文献汇报、学术汇报、做幻灯片、讲paper、读书报告PPT.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teach a micro-task in the style of the Feynman Technique. Start with a small concrete observation or action, explain the underlying concept from what the learner sees, then walk the learner step-by-step through the task. Before marking the micro-task done, require the learner to explain the underlying concept back in their own words; correct any misunderstanding before advancing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "run my launch day", "build a launch day runbook / war room", or "decide CONTINUE or ROLLBACK after the push"; produces a pre-conditions gate check (launch-readiness-auditor SHIP verdict + the authoritative date in launch-registry — missing either stops the skill), a dated hour-blocked runbook with owners (morning irreversible pushes, daytime monitoring loop, evening consolidation), a forced observation-window verdict after every irreversible action against pre-declared kill criteria, a P0-P3 incident ladder with rollback playbooks, and T-0 status lines for the registry proposal protocol. Not for channel submission content and platform rules — use community-launch-runner; not for media replies — use press-media-relations. 发布日runbook/作战室/观察窗/回滚裁决/发布日指挥
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineer why a design decision was made. Move from observation to inference. Use when studying products you admire, learning from competitors, or building analytical design thinking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain the same design observation to a designer, a developer, and a non-technical stakeholder. Same insight, three languages. Use when working cross-functionally or presenting design decisions to mixed audiences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run taste-informed design reviews using Observation > Principle > Question. Use when facilitating design critiques, improving feedback quality on a team, or building a shared vocabulary for quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Micro-decision analysis. Catalog the border radii, spacing scales, type sizes, and state coverage that most people miss. Use when auditing design systems, evaluating craft quality, or training granular perception.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotate and map the anatomy of any design. Identify visual hierarchy, spacing systems, color roles, and tension points through clinical analysis. Use when doing formal design audits, teaching design analysis, or building structured observation skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement AlarmKit alarms and countdown timers for iOS and iPadOS with Lock Screen, Dynamic Island, and Apple Watch system UI. Covers AlarmManager scheduling, AlarmAttributes and AlarmPresentation, AlarmButton stop and snooze actions, authorization, state observation, and Live Activity integration. Use when building wake-up alarms, countdown timers, or alarm-style alerts that need Apple's system alarm experience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor and review SwiftUI view files with strong defaults for small dedicated subviews, MV-over-MVVM data flow, stable view trees, explicit dependency injection, and correct Observation usage. Use when cleaning up a SwiftUI view, splitting long bodies, removing inline actions or side effects, reducing computed `some View` helpers, or standardizing `@Observable` and view model initialization patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor SwiftUI view files into stable, testable structure. Use when splitting large views, tightening data flow, or cleaning Observation ownership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates publish-ready LinkedIn posts for B2B SaaS marketing leaders writing from an operator point of view: real decisions, real trade-offs, real constraints, and defensible lessons. Use when turning an internal observation, framework, campaign decision, miss, or shipped artifact into a public LinkedIn post. Best for demand generation, ABM, marketing ops, product marketing, and SaaS GTM leaders building credibility through practical operating insight. Not intended for generic brand posts, company announcements, sales outreach, or long-form content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MITRE ATT&CK is a globally-accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) based on real-world observations. This skill covers systematically mapping threat actor beh
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to query the document_embeddings table for raw signal data using HogQL. Use when you need to perform semantic search over signals, fetch every signal that contributed to a specific report, or list signal types. For browsing the curated report layer (the Inbox) — listing reports, filtering by status/source, drilling into a single report by ID — use the `inbox-exploration` skill first; drop into this skill afterwards if the user wants the underlying observations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end observational epidemiology analysis — from research question (PECO Population/Exposure/Comparator/Outcome) to publication-ready statistical report. Covers cohort/case-control/cross-sectional design, regression with confounders, propensity scoring, sensitivity analysis. Writes Python code for every step. Use for epidemiology study analysis, NHANES/UK-Biobank-style analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。