1,411 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluate a local pre-trade checklist before manual order entry, blocking planless, oversized, revenge-risk, market-regime-blocked, or circuit-breaker-blocked entries while journaling the decision for trader-memory-core review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Have Codex implement a concrete work order and have Claude independently inspect the final changes. Preserves the explicit Codex builder choice; use claudex-loop for host-based planning and automatic reviewer selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build our social posting calendar", "set weekly slots and queue depth per channel", or "plan the evergreen recycle rotation"; produces the always-on brand calendar — pillar allocation with hero/hub/help balance and give:ask targets (all labeled Estimated starting heuristics to calibrate against own analytics, never scored rules), per-channel recurring slots with queue depth, a batching workflow, an evergreen recycle cycle with freshness re-checks, deliberate open slots for realtime/trend moments fed by trend-spotter go/skip verdicts, and first-comment/publish-order ops — cadence commitments filed to the channel registry, and no batch ships to the queue without a SHIP verdict from social-quality-auditor pre-publish mode. Not for repurposing an existing asset or the paid-amplification calendar — use content-amplifier. 社媒排期/内容日历/栏目配比/常青循环复用
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when platform-reported conversions disagree with GA4/ecommerce, when you suspect Meta and Google are double-counting the same sales, or for a standing (monthly) reconciliation workbook that de-dups stacked credit against an order-ID truth set, normalizes attribution windows and currency, compares attribution models, and reads incrementality from a geo/holdout test. Not for the point-in-time R2 veto or RQS gate — use ad-account-auditor; not for the ROI/ROAS ratio math itself — use roi-calculator; not for organic dark-social share attribution or GA4 direct-traffic decomposition — use dark-social-attributor. 付费广告归因对账/去重/增量
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "set up conversion values so tROAS optimizes profit not orders", "map margin onto my purchase value", "build value rules for lead / phone / signup conversions", or "stop bidding to revenue when I care about profit"; defines and QAs the conversion VALUE model — per-conversion values, margin/net-value adjustment, static-vs-dynamic value rules, proxy values for non-revenue actions, and a value-vs-count sanity check — as a value-model spec plus a pre-launch value QA sheet. Not for whether the tag fires or UTMs are clean — use conversion-signal-qa; not for cross-platform double-count de-dup — use attribution-reconciler; not for scoring R1/R2 — that is a scored veto in ad-account-auditor. 付费广告转化价值建模/利润出价/价值规则QA
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Serial Position Effect — first and last items in a sequence are recalled best. Use when ordering menus, lists, and steps. For emphasising one item regardless of its position, use `von-restorff-effect` (ui-design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish hierarchy through size, weight, colour, spacing, and position so the eye lands in the intended order. Use when composing new work. For judging an existing screen, use `critique-visual-hierarchy` (visual-critique).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Von Restorff Effect — the element that differs from its neighbours is the one remembered. Use when a single action must dominate. For overall ordering rather than single-element emphasis, use `visual-hierarchy`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Law of Closure — the eye completes implied shapes from partial forms. Use when reducing visual weight by dropping borders or letting negative space suggest structure. For explicit containers, use `law-of-common-region`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Law of Common Region — a shared container, background, or border groups elements regardless of spacing. Use when grouping must survive a tight layout. For grouping by spacing alone, use `law-of-proximity`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a form end to end — field order, grouping, validation, and completion. Use when the artifact is a form. For product-wide error strategy use `error-handling-ux`; for first-run signup use `onboarding-design`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds, runs, debugs, and operates event-driven applications using EventBridge Event Bus - a managed, centrally governed publish/subscribe event bus that an organization can share across many teams and accounts. Applicable when workloads need event-driven architectures, decoupling, choreography, asynchronous integration, pub/sub, fan-out, event ordering, delivered in sequence, event router, event broker, event bus, event store, event retention, event replay, deduplication, avro, protobuf, cloudevents, uses events or messages. Designed as a centrally managed event bus platform allowing governance and control - such as subscriber control, revocation, per-account throttling - while giving application owners flexibility across an organization spanning multiple accounts, with end-to-end open-standards observability and cost allocation. Also helps reduce costs in high fan-out scenarios where multi-account forwarding adds cost. A serverless, managed alternative to self-managed event streaming platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build animations in React Native and Expo, making the decisions in the order that determines whether they feel right — should it animate, which thread it runs on, which properties, spring or timing, how the gesture hands off, how it degrades. Writes the implementation with Reanimated, Gesture Handler, Expo Router and expo-haptics. Use when animating anything in an Expo app, adding gestures, sheets, screen transitions, press feedback or haptics, or fixing motion that stutters on device. For web animation use `animate`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares an app clone against the original: a feature parity score from the feature matrix (weighted by must, should, could) with the missing list in build order, plus a screenshot layout diff that ignores colour so a rebrand does not count against you. Two standard-library Python tools. Use when the user says "how close is my clone", "compare it to the original", "what's missing", "parity check", "diff the screens", "is it ready", or after /replica-test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans the stack, database schema and API for an app clone, from the recon map replica-recon wrote. Picks boring, managed tech, turns the inferred data model into real SQL with indexes and access rules, lists every route by flow, and orders the build as a thin vertical slice first. Use when the user says "plan the clone", "what stack should I use", "design the database", "write the schema", "plan the API", "architecture for my version of X", or after /replica-recon finishes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build Shopify applications, extensions, and themes using GraphQL/REST APIs, Shopify CLI, Polaris UI components, and Liquid templating. Capabilities include app development with OAuth authentication, checkout UI extensions for customizing checkout flow, admin UI extensions for dashboard integration, POS extensions for retail, theme development with Liquid, webhook management, billing API integration, product/order/customer management. Use when building Shopify apps, implementing checkout customizations, creating admin interfaces, developing themes, integrating payment processing, managing store data via APIs, or extending Shopify functionality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate payments with SePay (VietQR), Polar, Stripe, Paddle (MoR subscriptions), Creem.io (licensing). Checkout, webhooks, subscriptions, QR codes, multi-provider orders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert Chinese stories or ordered local images into silent hand-drawn Remotion videos, with generated hand lettering, 327 built-in assets (297 style recipes and 30 theme palettes), a curated 30-style menu, and automatic reference-image style analysis with optional private reuse. Use when users ask to generate, import, restyle, preview or render hand-drawn story videos; browse or classify styles; imitate the visual grammar of a reference image; or save a reference-derived style. Preserve the approved colored-pencil diary default when no other style is requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to rank and pick a supplier for a SKU. Load this whenever a task involves choosing a supplier, comparing quotes, or creating a purchase order.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a spec or requirement into a written plan a separate session or agent can execute, then drives that plan through review checkpoints. Use this before touching code on any multi-step task, when work needs handing to someone else, when a task keeps sprawling mid-implementation, or when a plan exists and needs executing in order with verification between steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs environment, health and safety on an operating site — hazard controls in order of effectiveness, incident recording and reporting obligations, and safety measurement that does not reward silence. Use this to build or audit a safety program, decide what controls a hazard actually needs, work out whether an injury is recordable or reportable, investigate an incident, or fix safety metrics that have stopped producing reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages the flow of goods and inputs — sourcing, inventory, lead times, fulfillment, and supply risk. Use this to reduce stockouts or excess inventory, plan for a supplier failure, decide reorder points and safety stock, improve fulfillment reliability, or assess concentration risk in a supply base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans the shape and size of the workforce — demand for roles, build-versus-buy, attrition, and sequencing hiring against budget. Use this to build a hiring plan, decide which roles to open and in what order, model attrition and backfill, plan for a growth or contraction scenario, or connect headcount plans to the budget.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。