「drag」の検索結果

Animation as communication. Feedback, orientation, emphasis, delight. If motion doesn't serve one of these four purposes, it shouldn't exist. Use when evaluating animation quality, designing transitions, or deciding whether motion adds or subtracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rank multiple design solutions and explain why. Separate personal preference from quality judgment. Use when comparing design options, evaluating competing approaches, or making design decisions with clear reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consistent radii, pixel-perfect alignment, state coverage, and the details that signal design quality. Use when polishing designs, auditing quality, or evaluating whether a design is ready to ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use taste as a competitive moat and business advantage. In the AI and vibe-coding era, execution is commoditized. Taste is the defensible edge. Use when advising founders on product differentiation, building product culture, evaluating why some products win despite fewer features, or understanding taste as a strategic asset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate the gap between what you can see and what you can make. The Ira Glass gap. Use when a designer is frustrated by the distance between their taste and their output, when mentoring someone through a creative plateau, or when someone is considering quitting because their work doesn't match their vision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured taste breakdowns of real products. The format for making taste observations legible and shareable. Use when analyzing products, writing case studies, documenting design observations, or teaching through example.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a structured design review that someone can act on without follow-up questions. Use when giving async design feedback, writing portfolio case studies, or documenting design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Density, whitespace, rhythm, and how space communicates relationships between elements. Use when building layouts, evaluating spacing consistency, or diagnosing why a design feels cramped or empty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a designer's taste through their typography decisions alone. Type is the fastest taste signal in any design. Use when evaluating design maturity, assessing portfolio quality, or understanding what typography reveals about design thinking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help other designers develop judgment without imposing your style. Use when mentoring designers, running design education, or building team-wide quality standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tell the difference between design decisions that age well and decisions that follow the crowd. Use when evaluating whether a design choice is principled or fashionable, or when a client asks to 'make it look modern.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run taste-informed design reviews using Observation > Principle > Question. Use when facilitating design critiques, improving feedback quality on a team, or building a shared vocabulary for quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured exposure habits for building taste through relentless, intentional consumption. Not passive scrolling. Active intake across design, architecture, film, music, food, and culture. Use when building a taste practice, advising on professional development, or diagnosing why someone's design range feels narrow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defend a design decision to skeptical stakeholders with structure and evidence. Use when presenting design work, writing design documentation, or pushing back on requests to change something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer why a design decision was made. Move from observation to inference. Use when studying products you admire, learning from competitors, or building analytical design thinking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Notice what's deliberately missing from a design. Restraint is a taste signal. Use when studying minimalist products, evaluating design maturity, or understanding the power of removal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose animation values that feel native on Apple platforms instead of guessing springs. Use when: picking a spring/duration/easing for any transition; an animation "feels off", sluggish, floaty, wobbly, or cheap; tuning a sheet, drawer, panel, selection lens, button press, or drag release; wiring gesture-driven motion; or someone asks "what spring should I use", "why does this feel wrong", "make it feel native/premium", "match Apple's feel". Also fires on hand-picked magic numbers in .spring(), on animations that jump when interrupted, and on motion that only starts after a gesture ends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement, review, or improve SwiftUI gesture handling. Use when adding tap, long press, drag, magnify, or rotate gestures, composing gestures with simultaneously/sequenced/exclusively, managing transient state with @GestureState, resolving parent/child gesture conflicts with highPriorityGesture or simultaneousGesture, building custom Gesture protocol conformances, or migrating from deprecated MagnificationGesture to MagnifyGesture or using the newer RotateGesture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framer Motion React animation library skill — declarative animations, gestures, layout transitions, scroll-triggered animations, variants, AnimatePresence, and performance optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the macOS desktop in the background — screenshots, mouse, keyboard, scroll, drag — without stealing the user's cursor, keyboard focus, or Space. Works with any tool-capable model. Load this skill whenever the `computer_use` tool is available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computational fluid dynamics — Navier-Stokes solvers, lid-driven cavity, channel flow, vortex methods, turbulence statistics, drag/lift computation. Spectral and finite-difference methods for incompressible and compressible flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates the end-to-end germline short-variant pipeline from FASTQ to a filtered, normalized, benchmarked VCF, chaining QC/trim, BWA-MEM2 alignment, duplicate marking, optional BQSR, calling (bcftools/GATK HaplotypeCaller/DeepVariant/DRAGEN), normalization, site+genotype filtering, annotation, and hap.py/vcfeval benchmarking. Use when deciding the pipeline-wide reference-genome commitment (GRCh38 analysis set vs T2T, ALT/decoy handling), sequencing the steps in the defensible order (normalize BEFORE annotate, filter site- then genotype-level), choosing the calling engine and single-sample vs cohort joint-calling, picking a filtering strategy by cohort size, or benchmarking stratified within GIAB confident regions. Hands off mechanism to the variant-calling and read-alignment component skills; not a re-teach of any single step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync delta specs from a change to main specs. Use when the user wants to update main specs with changes from a delta spec, without archiving the change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。