「criteria」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "test our messaging before we scale it", "design a message-market-fit panel", or "run a 5-second comprehension test on our new tagline"; produces a message-test design spec — hypothesis, panel and recruit criteria, comprehension / 5-second / message-market-fit (Wynter-style) protocols, stimulus set drawn from the canon, success thresholds, and a stop/revise decision rule — for the TALE Evaluate phase so the message is validated before any paid scale. It designs the test; it never runs the experiment or adjudicates a claim. Not for running the panel or A/B experiment — use send-experiment-designer or ad-test-designer; not for analyzing the results — use performance-analyzer; not for authoring the message itself — use message-system-architect. 消息测试/理解度测试/面板设计/五秒测试/消息市场契合

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run my launch day", "build a launch day runbook / war room", or "decide CONTINUE or ROLLBACK after the push"; produces a pre-conditions gate check (launch-readiness-auditor SHIP verdict + the authoritative date in launch-registry — missing either stops the skill), a dated hour-blocked runbook with owners (morning irreversible pushes, daytime monitoring loop, evening consolidation), a forced observation-window verdict after every irreversible action against pre-declared kill criteria, a P0-P3 incident ladder with rollback playbooks, and T-0 status lines for the registry proposal protocol. Not for channel submission content and platform rules — use community-launch-runner; not for media replies — use press-media-relations. 发布日runbook/作战室/观察窗/回滚裁决/发布日指挥

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze my target audience", "build an audience profile for influencer targeting", "research a niche community", or "deep-dive a subculture before partnering with creators"; in audience mode produces demographic/psychographic profiles, a platform-priority matrix, named personas, and an influencer-selection criteria set, and in niche mode produces a community map, culture decode (language/norms/taboos), key-voice tiers, a Brand Fit Score, and a phased entry strategy. Not for finding specific creators to contract — use influencer-discovery; not for scoring a shortlist on Suitability — use fit-scorer. 目标受众画像/人群分析 · 细分社群/亚文化调研

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an expert review against Nielsen's heuristics and domain criteria, with severity ratings. Use when you need findings without recruiting participants. For a facilitated team feedback session, use `design-critique` (design-ops).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write realistic usability task scenarios with success criteria and facilitation notes. Use when you have a study and need the tasks. For the surrounding study design, use `usability-test-plan` (design-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a project brief — problem space, constraints, audience, and success criteria. Use at kickoff for one specific project. For long-horizon aspiration use `north-star-vision`; for reusable decision rules use `design-principles`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose between competing concepts against criteria fixed in advance, and record what each rejected concept was testing. Use when several directions are alive and one has to win. For picking which problem to work on, use `opportunity-framework` (ux-strategy); for deciding by production traffic, use `a-b-test-design`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan accessibility testing — assistive technologies, participant criteria, WCAG coverage, and session protocol. Use when scheduling testing with real AT users. Not for evaluating a design yourself — use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a diary study — prompts, cadence, duration, participant criteria, and analysis frame. Use when behaviour unfolds over days or weeks. For a single-session study, use `usability-test-plan`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish review gates — criteria, checkpoints, and approval flow. Use when work ships without consistent review. For running one individual session, use `design-critique`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a usability study — research questions, methodology, participant criteria, metrics, and facilitation guide. Use when planning the study as a whole. For writing the task scenarios inside it, use `test-scenario` (prototyping-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze tau2-bench task export files to identify exactly where and why tasks failed. Map failures to specific conversation rounds, show root causes, check whether relevant documentation was available, and cite sources. Use this skill whenever you need to debug a tau2-bench evaluation, understand why an agent made wrong decisions, identify missing knowledge, or review task performance—especially when context length, eligibility criteria, or policy compliance might be at fault.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes down what is being built so a team can build it and know when they are done — problem and success measure before solution, scope stated by exclusion, user-visible behavior including the states everyone forgets, acceptance criteria someone can test, and the open questions named rather than buried. Use this to write a specification, review one that is causing rework, or work out why a delivered feature technically matched the request and still was not what anyone wanted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides whether and how to enter a new market — sizing demand from the bottom up rather than from a market report, testing whether your advantage transfers, choosing between organic entry, partnership and acquisition, sequencing the operational and regulatory work that entry actually requires, and setting the criteria that would tell you to stop. Use this to evaluate a new geography, segment or vertical, pressure-test an entry plan, or work out why a launched market never reached scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clinical Research Bias Assessment - Case-Control Study (NOS) v2.3.0. Use when you need to assess the bias of a case-control study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria, or when evaluating the quality of a medical paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision. Use when you need to filter literature for meta-analysis or systematic reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen full-text papers against inclusion/exclusion criteria, with optional PubMed metadata check using PMID. Use when the user needs to evaluate a paper for a meta-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to analyze an existing PostgreSQL database and identify which tables should be converted to Timescale/TimescaleDB hypertables. **Trigger when user asks to:** - Analyze database tables for hypertable conversion potential - Identify time-series or event tables in an existing schema - Evaluate if a table would benefit from Timescale/TimescaleDB - Audit PostgreSQL tables for migration to Timescale/TimescaleDB/TigerData - Score or rank tables for hypertable candidacy **Keywords:** hypertable candidate, table analysis, migration assessment, Timescale, TimescaleDB, time-series detection, insert-heavy tables, event logs, audit tables Provides SQL queries to analyze table statistics, index patterns, and query patterns. Includes scoring criteria (8+ points = good candidate) and pattern recognition for IoT, events, transactions, and sequential data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write feature specifications as requirements and user stories with acceptance criteria, focusing on business value and testable conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Final completion discipline including summary generation, plan document updates, and confirmation that all success criteria from the original plan are satisfied.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。