デザインのスキル

Design de produto nivel Apple — sistemas visuais, UX flows, acessibilidade, linguagem visual proprietaria, design tokens, prototipagem e handoff. Cobre Figma, design systems, tipografia, cor, espacamento, motion design e principios de design cognitivo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build tools that agents can use effectively, including architectural reduction patterns. Use when creating new tools for agent systems, debugging tool-related failures or misuse, or optimizing existing tool sets for better agent performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in designing and building autonomous AI agents. Masters tool use, memory systems, planning strategies, and multi-agent orchestration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement event stores for event-sourced systems. Use when building event sourcing infrastructure, choosing event store technologies, or implementing event persistence patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for quality focused software architecture. This skill should be used when users want to write code, design architecture, analyze code, in any case that relates to software development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Database design principles and decision-making. Schema design, indexing strategy, ORM selection, serverless databases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design to build maintainable, testable, and scalable systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tell the difference between design decisions that age well and decisions that follow the crowd. Use when evaluating whether a design choice is principled or fashionable, or when a client asks to 'make it look modern.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer why a design decision was made. Move from observation to inference. Use when studying products you admire, learning from competitors, or building analytical design thinking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Task sequences, progressive disclosure, and the pacing of an experience over time. Use when designing multi-step flows, evaluating onboarding, or diagnosing why users get lost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured taste breakdowns of real products. The format for making taste observations legible and shareable. Use when analyzing products, writing case studies, documenting design observations, or teaching through example.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Study how products evolve over time using archived versions. The decisions that survive redesigns are the taste decisions. Use when understanding what's essential vs. cosmetic in a design, or learning from product evolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain the same design observation to a designer, a developer, and a non-technical stakeholder. Same insight, three languages. Use when working cross-functionally or presenting design decisions to mixed audiences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Precise language for design feedback. Ban vague words. Name what you actually see. Use when giving design feedback, running critiques, or training teams to communicate about quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate the gap between what you can see and what you can make. The Ira Glass gap. Use when a designer is frustrated by the distance between their taste and their output, when mentoring someone through a creative plateau, or when someone is considering quitting because their work doesn't match their vision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a structured design review that someone can act on without follow-up questions. Use when giving async design feedback, writing portfolio case studies, or documenting design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Animation as communication. Feedback, orientation, emphasis, delight. If motion doesn't serve one of these four purposes, it shouldn't exist. Use when evaluating animation quality, designing transitions, or deciding whether motion adds or subtracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Response timing, acknowledgment, and making the interface feel alive. Every action deserves a response at the right speed. Use when designing interactions, evaluating responsiveness, or diagnosing why a product feels sluggish or dead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rank multiple design solutions and explain why. Separate personal preference from quality judgment. Use when comparing design options, evaluating competing approaches, or making design decisions with clear reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull design principles from architecture, fashion, film, industrial design, and physical spaces into screen-based design. Use when seeking inspiration beyond digital, expanding creative range, or building cross-disciplinary design vocabulary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draw from architecture, fashion, music, food, and industrial design to expand your design taste range. Use when seeking inspiration beyond digital, building diverse reference sets, or expanding creative vocabulary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。