4,557 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Annotate and map the anatomy of any design. Identify visual hierarchy, spacing systems, color roles, and tension points through clinical analysis. Use when doing formal design audits, teaching design analysis, or building structured observation skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run taste-informed design reviews using Observation > Principle > Question. Use when facilitating design critiques, improving feedback quality on a team, or building a shared vocabulary for quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
15-minute daily taste exercises. Monday through Friday. Compound effect over time. Use when building personal practice habits, training a team's design eye, or adding structure to professional development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build taste through volume of output, deliberate failure, and speed. Taste cannot be developed by watching. It's sharpened by making, failing, and making again. Use when designing practice routines, breaking through creative blocks, or helping someone move from analysis to execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic design quality evaluation. Hierarchy, type, color, space, craft, system. Use when evaluating whether a design is ready to ship, running quality audits, or setting quality standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tag design references by principle, not aesthetic. Build a library you can actually search. Use when saving references, organizing inspiration, or building a design library that returns useful results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose your taste gaps across six skill areas. Know what to practice. Use when starting a taste development program, checking progress, or identifying specific areas to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured taste breakdowns of real products. The format for making taste observations legible and shareable. Use when analyzing products, writing case studies, documenting design observations, or teaching through example.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a reference system that returns the right reference in under 60 seconds. Use when setting up a design reference library, reorganizing existing collections, or helping teams build shared reference systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draw from architecture, fashion, music, food, and industrial design to expand your design taste range. Use when seeking inspiration beyond digital, building diverse reference sets, or expanding creative vocabulary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Response timing, acknowledgment, and making the interface feel alive. Every action deserves a response at the right speed. Use when designing interactions, evaluating responsiveness, or diagnosing why a product feels sluggish or dead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain the same design observation to a designer, a developer, and a non-technical stakeholder. Same insight, three languages. Use when working cross-functionally or presenting design decisions to mixed audiences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defend a design decision to skeptical stakeholders with structure and evidence. Use when presenting design work, writing design documentation, or pushing back on requests to change something.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a designer's taste through their typography decisions alone. Type is the fastest taste signal in any design. Use when evaluating design maturity, assessing portfolio quality, or understanding what typography reveals about design thinking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help other designers develop judgment without imposing your style. Use when mentoring designers, running design education, or building team-wide quality standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pull design principles from architecture, fashion, film, industrial design, and physical spaces into screen-based design. Use when seeking inspiration beyond digital, expanding creative range, or building cross-disciplinary design vocabulary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Task sequences, progressive disclosure, and the pacing of an experience over time. Use when designing multi-step flows, evaluating onboarding, or diagnosing why users get lost.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Animation as communication. Feedback, orientation, emphasis, delight. If motion doesn't serve one of these four purposes, it shouldn't exist. Use when evaluating animation quality, designing transitions, or deciding whether motion adds or subtracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tell the difference between design decisions that age well and decisions that follow the crowd. Use when evaluating whether a design choice is principled or fashionable, or when a client asks to 'make it look modern.'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing or writing LLM, RAG, MCP, tool, or agent code for OWASP-aligned security issues; triggered by "owasp my code", "owasp this PR", AI security review, PR review, or changes to AI system code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run or maintain the full tdmcp repo quality-audit team: command sweeps, all package/Makefile/CI gates, security review, usability/flow review, refactor/test-gap analysis, coverage hardening, QA, and follow-up fix waves. Use whenever the user asks for a complete audit, improve repo/code quality, test all commands, find security/usability failures, refactor debt, add missing tests, re-run the audit, continue a previous quality wave, or verify the repo is ready.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in vector databases, embedding strategies, and semantic search implementation. Masters Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Milvus, and pgvector for RAG applications, recommendation systems, and similar
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in building Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems. Masters embedding models, vector databases, chunking strategies, and retrieval optimization for LLM applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。